Literature DB >> 23193045

Opposite differential allocation by males and females of the same species.

Tobias Limbourg1, A Christa Mateman, C M Lessells.   

Abstract

Differential allocation (DA)-the adjustment of an individual's parental investment in relation to its mate's attractiveness-is increasingly recognized as an important component of sexual selection. However, although DA is expected by both sexes of parents in species with biparental care, DA by males has rarely been investigated. We have previously demonstrated a decrease in the feeding rates of female blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus when their mate's UV coloration was experimentally reduced (i.e. positive DA). In this study, we used the same experimental protocol in the same population to investigate DA by male blue tits in relation to their female's UV coloration. Males mated to UV-reduced females had higher feeding rates than those mated to control females (i.e. negative DA). Thus, male and female blue tits display opposite DA for the same component of parental effort (chick provisioning), the first time that this has been reported for any species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23193045      PMCID: PMC3565494          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  16 in total

1.  Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Reproductive investment when mate quality varies: differential allocation versus reproductive compensation.

Authors:  W Edwin Harris; Tobias Uller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Direct versus indirect sexual selection: genetic basis of colour, size and recruitment in a wild bird.

Authors:  Jarrod D Hadfield; Malcolm D Burgess; Alex Lord; Albert B Phillimore; Sonya M Clegg; Ian P F Owens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Preferences for ultraviolet partners in the blue tit.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Nanostructure predicts intraspecific variation in ultraviolet-blue plumage colour.

Authors:  Matthew D Shawkey; Anne M Estes; Lynn M Siefferman; Geoffrey E Hill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Female blue tits adjust parental effort to manipulated male UV attractiveness.

Authors:  Tobias Limbourg; A Christa Mateman; Staffan Andersson; C M Lessells
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Female coloration indicates female reproductive capacity in blue tits.

Authors:  C Doutrelant; A Grégoire; N Grnac; D Gomez; M M Lambrechts; P Perret
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Correlations between ultraviolet coloration, overwinter survival and offspring sex ratio in the blue tit.

Authors:  S C Griffith; J Ornborg; A F Russell; S Andersson; B C Sheldon
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Moult speed affects structural feather ornaments in the blue tit.

Authors:  M Griggio; L Serra; D Licheri; C Campomori; A Pilastro
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Heterozygosity-based assortative mating in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus): implications for the evolution of mate choice.

Authors:  Vicente García-Navas; Joaquín Ortego; Juan José Sanz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  6 in total

1.  The evolution of postpairing male mate choice.

Authors:  Nan Lyu; Maria R Servedio; Huw Lloyd; Yue-Hua Sun
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Differential allocation of parental investment and the trade-off between size and number of offspring.

Authors:  Irja Ida Ratikainen; Thomas Ray Haaland; Jonathan Wright
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The early maternal environment shapes the parental response to offspring UV ornamentation.

Authors:  Jorge García-Campa; Wendt Müller; Ester Hernández-Correas; Judith Morales
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Differential allocation in a gift-giving spider: males adjust their reproductive investment in response to female condition.

Authors:  Diego Solano-Brenes; Luiz Ernesto Costa-Schmidt; Maria Jose Albo; Glauco Machado
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-07-08

5.  Structural (UV) and carotenoid-based plumage coloration - signals for parental investment?

Authors:  Carsten Lucass; Arne Iserbyt; Marcel Eens; Wendt Müller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Colour ornamentation in the blue tit: quantitative genetic (co)variances across sexes.

Authors:  A Charmantier; M E Wolak; A Grégoire; A Fargevieille; C Doutrelant
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.821

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.