| Literature DB >> 23191932 |
Ivaylo Rilkov Daskalov1, Plamen Dimitrov Petrovsky, Lilia Davidkova Demirevska.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate early changes in left ventricular longitudinal systolic function in patients with hypertension (HTN) with and without concomitant diastolic dysfunction (DD) and the clinical implications of these findings.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23191932 PMCID: PMC3584828 DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-10-46
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound ISSN: 1476-7120 Impact factor: 2.062
Demographics and clinical characteristics of the study population
| 32 (32%) | 35 (35%) | 33 (33%) | 50 (50%) | |
| 96 (32.1%) | 105 (35.1%) | 98 (32.7%) | 148 (49.4%) | |
| HTN mild (n=100) | 33 (33%) | 34 (34%) | 33 (33%) | 48 (48%) |
| HTN moderate (n=100) | 31 (31%) | 35 (35%) | 34 (34%) | 53 (53%) |
| HTN severe (n=99) | 32 (31.68%) | 36 (35.64%) | 31 (30.69%) | 47 (46.53%) |
| 95 (31.9%) | 99 (33.3%) | 103 (34.6%) | 153 (51.5%) | |
| DD impaired relax. (n=101) | 32 (31.7%) | 34 (33.7%) | 35 (34.6%) | 47 (46.5%) |
| DD pseudonormal. (n=99) | 32 (32.3%) | 33 (33.3%) | 34 (34.3%) | 52 (52.5%) |
| DD restriction (n=97) | 31 (32%) | 32 (33%) | 34 (35%) | 54 (55.7%) |
| Subjects in the groups (n, %) | 223 (32%) | 239 (34.3%) | 234 (33.6%) | 352 (50.6%) |
Demographics and clinical characteristics of the study population
| Height (cm) | 170±14 | 168±16 | 168±14 | 0.241 |
| Weight (kg) | 66±7 | 67±9 | 65±9 | 0.311 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.9±2 | 23.3±2 | 23.1±2 | 0.233 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 70±10 | 72±10 | 68±10 | 0.08 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 125±5 | 128±5 | 130±5 | <0.0001 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 70±8 | 78±8 | 80±8 | <0.0001 |
| EF (Simpson’s method %) | 64.4±2% | 63.7±4% | 63.9±4% | 0.161 |
Figure 1Peak Sm velocity obtained from the lateral site of the mitral annulus using spectral PW TDI.
Figure 2Peak Sm velocity obtained from the septal site of the mitral annulus using spectral PW TDI.
Statistical analysis
| | Source of variation | ||||
| ( | |||||
| Huynh-Feldt (0,326) | | Multiple r | =0,915 | <0,0001 | |
| Greenhouse-Geisser (0,324) | <0,0001 | Healthy male | −0,838 | <0,0001 | |
| Healthy female | −0,821 | <0,0001 | |||
| Age and Gender | <0,0001 | HTN male | −0,734 | <0,0001 | |
| HTN female | −0,580 | <0,0001 | |||
| Age and Gender | <0,0001 | DD male | −0,891 | <0,0001 | |
| HTN and DD | DD female | −0,882 | <0,0001 | ||
Limits of Smin Healthy pts. (n=100)
| >10.4±0.1 (cm/s) | 10.4-10.3±0.1 (cm/s) | 10.3±0.1(cm/s) | |||
| >10.3±0.1 (cm/s) | 10.3-10.2±0.1 (cm/s) | 10.2±0.1(cm/s) | |||
Limits of Smin HTN pts. (n=299)
| 10.2±0.1 (cm/s) | 10.2-10.1±0.1 (cm/s) | 10.1±0.1 (cm/s) | < | |||
| 10.1±0.1 (cm/s) | 10.1-9.9±0.1 (cm/s) | 9.9±0.1 (cm/s) | < | |||
Limits of Smin DD pts. (n=297)
| 9.8±0.1 (cm/s) | 9.5±0.1 (cm/s) | 9.3±0.01 (cm/s) | < | |||
| 9.7±0.01 (cm/s) | 9.2±0.01 (cm/s) | 8.8±0.01 (cm/s) | < | |||
Figure 3Averaged mitral Sm stratified by gender.
Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
| | | |||||
| Sm lat. (cm/s) | 0.7358 | 0.5329 ÷ 0.8529 | Good | 0.8478 | 0.6953 ÷ 0.9240 | Very good |
| Sm sep. (cm/s) | 0.9911 | 0.9867 ÷ 0.9941 | Very good | 0.9955 | 0.9933 ÷ 0.9970 | Very good |
| Sm (avg) (cm/s) | 0.8634 | 0.8010 ÷ 0.9010 | Very good | 0.9216 | 0.8901 ÷ 0.9450 | Very good |
| Sm lat. (cm/s) | 0.7338 | 0.5170 ÷ 0.8622 | Good | 0.8465 | 0.6816 ÷ 0.9260 | Very good |
| Sm sep. (cm/s) | 0.9337 | 0.9020 ÷ 0.9553 | Very Good | 0.9653 | 0.9485 ÷ 0.9772 | Very good |
| Sm (avg) (cm/s) | 0.8337 | 0.8015 ÷0.8080 | Very Good | 0.9059 | 0.8095 ÷ 0.9210 | Very good |
| Sm lat. (cm/s) | 0.7841 | 0.6924 ÷ 0.8509 | Good | 0.8790 | 0.8183 ÷ 0.9194 | Very good |
| Sm sep. (cm/s) | 0.8049 | 0.6338 ÷ 0.9009 | Very Good | 0.8919 | 0.7759 ÷ 0.9479 | Good |
| Sm (avg) (cm/s) | 0.7945 | 0.7234 ÷ 0.8222 | Good | 0.8854 | 0.8005 ÷ 0.9201 | Very good |
The ICC is a measure of the reliability of measurements or ratings. The table reports two coefficients with their respective 95% CI. Single measures: this is an index for the reliability of the ratings for one, typical, single rater and average measures which is an index for the reliability of different raters averaged together. (<0.20 Poor; 0.21-0.40 Fair; 0.41-0.60 Moderate; 0.61-0.80 Good; 0.81-1.00 Very good).
Inter- and intra-observer variability of the Sm
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sm lat. (cm/s) | 10.2±0.1 | 0.7 (−1.0 ÷ 2.0) | 10.3±0.1 | 2.5 (−3.5 ÷ 1.5) | ||
| Sm sep. (cm/s) | 10.4±0.1 | 1.13(−1.5 ÷ 1.5) | 10.4±0.1 | 2.3 (−0.2 ÷ 2.4) | ||
| Sm (avg) (cm/s) | 10.3±0.1 | 1.5 (−1.0 ÷ 1.95) | 10.4±0.1 | 2.2 (0.1 ÷ 2.5) | ||
| Sm lat. (cm/s) | 10.1±0.1 | 0.5 (−2.2 ÷ 2.2) | 10.1±0.1 | 0.3 (0.0 ÷ 0.5) | ||
| Sm sep. (cm/s) | 10.2±0.1 | 1.2 (−1.2 ÷ 1.2) | 10.2±0.1 | −2.8 (−3.0 ÷ −0.5) | ||
| Sm (avg) (cm/s) | 10.1±0.1 | −2.5 (−3.0 ÷1.0) | 10.1±0.1 | 1.4(−1.1 ÷ 2.8) | ||
| Sm lat. (cm/s) | 9.2±0.1 | 1.0 (−1.5 ÷ 1.5) | 8.9±0.1 | 0.95 (−0.2 ÷ 1.0) | ||
| Sm sep. (cm/s) | 9.5±0.1 | 0.25 (−1.5 ÷ 1.5) | 9.4±0.1 | 1.13 (−1.5 ÷ 1.5) | ||
| Sm (avg) (cm/s) | 9.3±0.1 | −2.7 (−3.0 ÷ −1.0) | 9.2±0.1 | −1.8 (−2.4 ÷ 0.6) | ||
CV = [(measurment1 − measurment2)/arithmetic mean of measurement] × 100.
Figure 4Averaged mitral Sm adjusted by age and gender.