Literature DB >> 23189193

A proteomic analysis of seed development in Brassica campestri L.

Wenlan Li1, Yi Gao, Hong Xu, Yu Zhang, Jianbo Wang.   

Abstract

To gain insights into the protein dynamics during seed development, a proteomic study on the developing Brassica campestri L. seeds with embryos in different embryogenesis stages was carried out. The seed proteins at 10, 16, 20, 25 and 35 DAP (days after pollination), respectively, were separated using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and identities of 209 spots with altered abundance were determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/TOF MS). These proteins were classified into 16 groups according to their functions. The most abundant proteins were related to primary metabolism, indicating the heavy demand of materials for rapid embryo growth. Besides, the high amount of proteins involved in protein processing and destination indicated importance of protein renewal during seed development. The remaining were those participated in oxidation/detoxification, energy, defense, transcription, protein synthesis, transporter, cell structure, signal transduction, secondary metabolism, transposition, DNA repair, storage and so on. Protein abundance profiles of each functional class were generated and hierarchical cluster analysis established 8 groups of dynamic patterns. Our results revealed novel characters of protein dynamics in seed development in Brassica campestri L. and provided valuable information about the complex process of seed development in plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23189193      PMCID: PMC3506616          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Plant seed is an important organ that is evolutionarily advantageous for plant survival and contributes so much to animal and human life [1]. Seed development goes through three overlapping phases, i.e. morphogenesis, seed filling and seed desiccation, which involve coordinated growth of three seed components, seed coat, endosperm and embryo [2]. Seed development involves highly dynamic processes of cell division, differentiation, growth, pattern formation and macromolecule production [3], [4], elucidating the underlying mechanisms will provide insight into the complex system coordinating plant development and metabolism. In recent years, genetic and molecular analyses have identified critical players in the process of seed development [1]. DNA microarray and RNA-seq technique are also advantageous by large-scale genome-wide study at the mRNA level [5]–[7]. However, mRNA level doesn’t always reflect protein abundance [8], and genomic tools can’t provide precise information on protein levels [9], limiting our understanding on those metabolic and molecular networks. Proteomics provides more powerful tool to understand the complex protein dynamics and the underlying regulatory mechanisms during seed development [10]–[12]. By examining temporal patterns and simultaneous changes in protein accumulation, extensive proteomic studies have been carried out in legumes [13], [14], Arabidopsis [15], [16], rapeseed [17], [18], rice [19], wheat [20], [21] and many other species [10] to profile protein dynamics during seed development. The most popular proteins are those participating in central metabolism, followed by those related to cellular structure, and many previously unknown proteins are indicated important roles in embryo development [12]. In addition, proteome studies also reveal some important characters of seed proteins. For example, a proteome study on Medicago truncatula reveals a remarkable compartmentalization of enzymes involved in methionine biosynthesis between the seed tissues, therefore regulating the availability of sulfur-containing amino acids for embryo protein synthesis during seed filling [22]; in tomato seed, the most abundant proteins in both the embryo and endosperm were found to be seed storage proteins, such as legumins, vicilins and albumin [23]. These proteomic applications have greatly expanded our knowledge on seed development. Plant embryo development, also known as embryogenesis, defines an important development process in higher plant life cycle [24]. Embryo development starts from a double fertilization event in which two sperm nuclei fuse with the egg cell and central cell nuclei respectively, then the zygote undergoes a series of cell divisions and differentiation events to initiate embryo development, going through a globular embryo stage, then a heart-stage, a torpedo-stage and a bended-cotyledon-stage embryo consecutively to produce the mature embryo [25]–[27]. Therefore, embryogenesis covers part of the processes of morphogenesis and seed filling during seed development. There are gaps in our understanding on the complete seed development process, as current proteomic studies mainly focus on the protein dynamics during the seed filling or seed dessication. A systematic view of the seed development process encompassing complete embryo development stages is necessary for integrity of our knowledge of full seed development. This is especially meaningful for most dicot plants, because in the mature seed of different species, the relative content of endosperm and embryo is variable. The embryo in dicots is normally the major part of the mature seed, such as in species of Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica napus, and the endosperm is almost completely absent in the mature seed, whereas in monocts such as wheat, maize, and rice, endosperm tissues possess the majority of the whole seed mass. To this end, oilseed (Brassica campestri L.) takes its advantage for its relatively larger embryo compared to the model plant Arabidopsis and ease to be accurately differentiated from embryo developmental stages [28]. B. campestri belongs to the mustard family (Brassicaceae), and like most dicotyledonous plants, its embryo development goes through morphologically defined globular, heart, torpedo, and bended cotyledon stages to produce the mature embryo [25], [26], [29]. Here, using B. campestri seeds with embryos in five sequential development stages of embryogenesis, we carried out a proteomic study on protein dynamics aiming at understanding seed development of oilseed.

Results

High-resolution Proteomes of the Developing B. campestri Seeds

To isolate proteins of seeds at different stages, developing B. campestri seeds were harvested at precisely 10, 16, 20, 25 and 35 DAP when their embryos were in the globular embryo stage, heart stage, torpedo stage, bended-cotyledon stage and C-shaped mature embryo, respectively (Figure 1). Then the whole proteins were resolved and detected using high-resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) followed by colloidal Coomassic brilliant blue staining. Initial analyses were performed with immobilized pH gradient (IPG) strips that ranged from pH 3 to 10. It was observed that the region from pH 4 to 7 was a highly dense area on the proteome map, so analyses with pH 4 to 7 IPG strips were further performed to attain high resolution proteome maps. The 2-DE maps showed a highly dynamic proteome during B. campestris seed development (Figure 1). Using the ImageMaster 2D Platinum software 6.0 (GE Healthcare), more than 800 CBB R250-stained protein spots were reproducibly detected from at least three independent 2-D gels, suggesting they were involved in the seed development.
Figure 1

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis analysis of proteins isolated from developing Brassica campestri L. seeds.

Seed samples were collected at 10 (B), 16 (C), 20 (D), 25 (E) and 35 (F) days after pollination (DAP) respectively (A). Seed development were monitored by observing their embryos that were at globular stage (g), heart stage (h), torpedo stage (t), bended cotyledon stage (b), and mature embryo stage (m), respectively (A). Total seed proteins were separated by 2-DGE with IEF (pH 4–7) and detected by Coomassie Brilliant Blue.

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis analysis of proteins isolated from developing Brassica campestri L. seeds.

Seed samples were collected at 10 (B), 16 (C), 20 (D), 25 (E) and 35 (F) days after pollination (DAP) respectively (A). Seed development were monitored by observing their embryos that were at globular stage (g), heart stage (h), torpedo stage (t), bended cotyledon stage (b), and mature embryo stage (m), respectively (A). Total seed proteins were separated by 2-DGE with IEF (pH 4–7) and detected by Coomassie Brilliant Blue.

Identification of Dynamically Accumulated Seed Proteins of B. campestri

To select protein differentially accumulated over five developmental stages, their proteome profiles were compared using ImageMaster software and 260 spots with at least a two-fold change in statistical analysis (P≤0.05) in combination with manual validation and quantification. Then they were excised from the 2-DE gels and identified by MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS MASCOT and MASCOT database searching. Identities of a total of 209 proteins with altered accumulation were established (Table 1 and Figure 2). G/O analysis was carried out on the base of protein function and these proteins were classified into 16 groups, as depicted in Table 1, including primary metabolism, protein processing and destination, oxidation and detoxification, energy, transcription, protein synthesis, cell structure, signal transduction, defense, secondary metabolism, DNA repair and storage, suggesting these proteins should be involved in a wide range of cellular activities during seed development. Those proteins related to primary metabolism could be further classified into the TCA cycle, carbohydrate metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, nitrogen metabolism, amino acid metabolism, and others (Table 1). Importantly, these spots represented 147 non-redundant proteins, for example, five spots were identified to be enolase (127, 139, 248, 452, 132) and a total of 8 spots were found to be triosephosphate isomerase (591, 592, 557, 583, 588, 560, 573, 589), indicating some of the selected spots are isoforms or modified (Table 1). By calculating the relative proportions, it was found the most abundant proteins participated in the primary metabolism (32.1%), highlighting the dynamic requirement for the growing seed. The second group is related to protein processing/destination (23.4%) followed by those in energy production (8.1%), oxidation/and detoxification (6.7%), disease and defense (5.7%). The other processes these proteins got involved were protein synthesis (4.3%), signal transduction (3.8%), secondary metabolism (3.8%), cell structure (1.9%), transcription (1.9%), DNA repair (1.9%), transposon (1.4%), storage (1.4%), transporter (1.4%), unclear classification (1.0%) and unknown (1.0%) (Figure 3).
Table 1

List of total 209 seed proteins differentially accumulated over sequential seed development stages in Brassica campestri L.

Spot NumberDescriptionSpeciesIDMWPIMOWSE ScoreRelative Protein Abundance
Days After Pollination(DAP)
1. Primary metabolism 1016202535
1.1 The TCA cycle
347malate dehydrogenase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1521972135548.36.114150.0740.2910.1471.710.061
350cytosolic malate dehydrogenase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2159356535639.471610.1320.1520.1070.4570.027
355malate dehydrogenase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1521972135548.36.112341.4380.4930.0830.0770.044
428mitochondrial NAD-dependent malate dehydrogenase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2159290535753.88.543810.6240.2270.0230.3190.143
429mitochondrial NAD-dependent malate dehydrogenase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2159290535753.88.543580.1190.0880.0460.20.059
423chloroplast malate dehydrogenase Brassica napus gi|20766727442292.28.517730.7950.2370.0310.3241.279
446chloroplast malate dehydrogenase Brassica rapa gi|20766727442292.28.51108000.1250.0670.078
233NADP-specific isocitrate dehydrogenase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2026038445703.16.132320.0990.1590.3980.1170.075
371pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 beta subunit Arabidopsis thaliana gi|21593379439595.533000.0730.3790.1130.1650.026
398pyruvate dehydrogenase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1524128639151.15.673820.1891.840.0790.0850.793
400pyruvate dehydrogenase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1524128639151.15.673270.4370.2990.1630.130.04
320succinyl-CoA ligase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522535345316.96.32280.1280.480.0310.0490.039
576aconitase C-terminal domain-containing protien Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522422126773.56.33422000.180.50.64
611aconitase C-terminal domain-containing protein Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522422126773.56.33427000.1260.1710.149
494aconitase C-terminal domain-containing protein Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522422126773.56.33442000.0540.2080.11
1.2 Carbohydrate metabolism
333fructose-bisphosphate aldolase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523171538515.96.051900.0590.3580.1330.0370.038
345fructose-bisphosphate aldolase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523171538515.96.052110.1650.1540.2940.8070.234
348fructose-bisphosphate aldolase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523171538515.96.051280.3140.1460.1140.260.073
712,3-bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2153726060661.95.513291.820.1530.1120.140.043
662,3-biphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1839106660541.75.32802.5190.0620.6760.0852.278
127enolase Brassica napus gi|34597330473465.462470.2370.1550.1162.240.126
139enolase Brassica rapa gi|34597330473465.461540.560.3240.4610.3930.051
248enolase Brassica rapa gi|34597330473465.462160.0750.7230.120.1270.082
452enolase Brassica rapa gi|34597330473465.4613800.010.070.520.065
132Enolase (LOS2) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522798747689.35.541620.2730.2160.4120.9180.044
536glyoxalase II Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1644427277705.58321000.1280.2160.361
346glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase C Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2159324036966.16.62480.0530.1740.1270.2890.105
360glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase C2 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|14532388233884.56.67400.3560.1440.1250.1010.061
332phosphoglycerate kinase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2153685342121.45.493450.0530.5650.2340.0680.037
336phosphoglycerate kinase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2153685342121.45.496300.0890.6730.230.1310.063
591triosephosphate isomerase Oryza sativa gi|55310727588.36.6222000.090.3561.095
592triosephosphate isomerase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|414550271385.24188000.2430.1870.182
557triosphosphate isomerase-like protein type II Dimocarpus longan gi|26241051527261.36.1356000.0720.420.127
583triosephosphate isomerase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522647933325.17.67287000.2340.3520.055
588cytosolic triosephosphate isomerase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|414550271385.24205000.0790.6870.161
560triosephosphate isomerase Oryza sativa gi|55310727588.36.6210000.110.3950.069
573cytosolic triosephosphate isomerase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|414550271385.24150000.0641.4040.091
589cytosolic triosephosphate isomerase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|414550271385.24221000.0770.4160.128
201UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylytransferase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523794751887.25.731290.0710.1840.3040.3970.087
199UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridyly transferase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523794751887.25.732950.2360.4730.1220.0890.094
436mannose 6-phoshpate reductase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|15226489349886.16141000.0110.0840.123
135alanine aminotransferase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|21954071594965.911010.1230.2060.4260.1510.097
413beta-glucosidase, putative Ricinus communis gi|25554214742630.95.58580.1380.3670.3011.0080.072
251UDP-D-apiose/UDP-D-xylose synthetase Gossypium hirsutum gi|21190652043382.26.112710.190.1470.1210.1050.084
2573-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2155358443272.75.8610.1870.7570.4360.1560.14
2613-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase Ricinus communis gi|25557921243454.45.48680.1030.1940.3880.1230.06
531Trehalose-phosphatase family protein Oryza sativa gi|7755588124791.35.5847000.1140.2850.425
1.3 Fatty acid metabolism
405enoyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) reductase Brassica napus gi|1442225940683.88.533750.510.9630.6570.4950.15
386enoyl reductase Brassica napus gi|176996640831.19.252370.5040.2560.1830.1540.131
401enoyl reductase Brassica napus gi|1442225740865.29.271930.430.3880.0520.1480.151
1933-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase1 (KAS1) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|7932995644701.88.732230.1110.1330.1880.1470.053
195KAS1 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|7932995644701.88.733640.1820.210.3250.2860.018
6703-ketoacyl-ACP dehydratase Brassica napus gi|1433412424621.89.1982000.0280.1940.13
1.4 Nitrogen metabolism
256Glutamine synthetase Brassica napus gi|16640619447315.85.845150.2911.0740.1590.1010.029
315glutamine synthetase Raphanus sativus gi|152656238494.25.933830.2550.6360.3570.240.109
1.5 Amino acid metabolism
138Imidazole glycerol-phosphate synthase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|22242471964152.96.312740.0860.170.2750.0450.04
213IAA amidohydrolase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1812969247986.35.812440.10.2010.0960.0850.037
235Fumarylacetoacetase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2232950146066.15.311171.1120.6090.1810.1360.052
237fumarylacetoacetase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2232950146066.15.31960.1380.1630.4460.1530.045
276acetylomithine deacetylase Brassica oleracea gi|8925768648003.35.454010.1580.5930.2470.1780.132
581indole-3-glycerol phosphate synthase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2159258744595.56.9959000.0820.2280.747
629indole-3-glycerol phosphate synthase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2159258744595.56.99215000.0450.0920.154
271indole-3-glycerol phosphate synthase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2159258744595.56.99570.1850.6570.1510.1250.402
505o-acetylserine lyase isoform A1 (OASA1) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2233125719625.27.7180000.1090.0970.062
1.6 Others
668D-galacturonic acid reductase 2 Actinidia deliciosa gi|28443794134701.86.6753000.0620.390.3
236MAT3 (methinonie adenosyltransferase 3(SAMhecheng) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522804842470.65.762720.1340.6150.1250.0870.058
231SAM-2 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523435443227.85.675540.0630.770.1870.1440.048
537GLYR1 (glyoxylate reductase 1) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|79313434295006.2242000.250.50.24
2. Protein synthesis
601translation initiation factor eiF3 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1752898866697.45.5453000.080.1470.182
407elongation factor Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2339728774184.47.121681.620.3930.0530.4620.048
539putative cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase Oryza sativa gi|2275838159509.96.258000.0650.1890.113
308small ribosomal protein 4 Encephalartos gratus gi|17051624721815.810.54440.2210.1730.0561.2580.045
681small ribosomal protein 4 Equisetum bogotense gi|16565378217089.9455000.0540.6880.181
489nascent polypeptide-associated complex subunit alpha-like protein 3 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|240256288220444.41248000.0490.0940.389
515nascent polypeptide-associated complex subunit alpha-like protein 3 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|240256288220444.41215000.0430.2670.489
470nascent polypeptide-associated complex subunit alpha-like protein 3 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|240256288220444.41190000.0590.2170.145
288nascent polypeptide-associated complex subunit alpha-like protein 3 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|240256288220444.41480.5420.1450.090.140.17
3. Protein processing/destination
42heat shock protein 70 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|674659277058.65.132950.2480.2240.4990.3040.223
46chloroplast HSP70 Cucumis sativus gi|124245039753505.184550.1050.3040.480.220.107
49BIP2 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|3069396273515.95.114280.5421.330.4380.2770.176
53BIP2 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|3069396273515.95.115191.4920.4180.3070.2030.111
73protein disulfide isomerase Brassica carinata gi|7799935755706.21331330.0490.2270.3610.5880.038
77ATPDIL1-2 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|15222397556329.44.9870.7630.4580.3880.2260.043
82ATPDIL1-2 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|15222397556329.44.91200.2410.340.5461.260.123
87ATPDIL1-1 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|3068752154125.44.971151.6870.960.470.3240.23
90ATPDIL1-1 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|3068752154125.44.973200.7150.0840.2980.5410.064
91CPN60b Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522272963769.66.211290.4830.1170.0940.0850.704
112BIP2 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|3069396273515.95.115150.1410.1270.1310.5450.193
216RPT3 (regulatory particle triple-A ATPase 3) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523715945722.65.422480.8990.3760.0790.0750.09
328protein disulphide isomerase Brassica napus gi|4559326125754.36.453210.1280.6020.1410.1370.057
344UNE5 (unfertilized embryo sac5) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522661039472.45.81110.1560.6920.1010.1050.079
353UNE5 (unfertilized embryo sac5)-disulfite isomerase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|14533143136514.85.491782.460.2340.1510.8640.039
455PAF2 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|15220151303914.97160000.0560.0940.134
46420S proteasome subunit PAF1 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|342109230314.94.97250000.0890.190.065
528immunophilin Arabidopsis thaliana gi|127240817675.94.959000.0520.3870.133
181cytosol aminopeptidase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|15224101544755.661420.3210.1790.0470.4110.16
187leucine aminopeptidase Ricinus communis gi|25557699161171.68.09720.1320.2650.0590.1730.075
548cysteine proteinase inhibitor Brassica rapa gi|125642422930.65.95221000.210.60.22
559PAC1-ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523326827457.96.6130000.0690.2510.168
576OUT-like cysteine protease family protein Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522361523410.64.9849000.230.420.64
592PAE2-20S PROTEASOME ALPHA SUBUNIT E2 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523182425960.94.7444000.2430.2270.238
619chaperonin 10 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|305715026912.58.86255000.330.330.67
626multicatalytic endopeptidase complex, proteasome precursor, beta subunit Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2159236524016.15.7544000.0370.0890.127
527peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase-like protein Arabidopsis thaliana gi|21554407329177.6641000.0120.2140.115
635peptidylprolyl isomerase ROC4 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2155583128178.18.83282000.1480.0870.067
641translationally-controlled tumor protein Zea mays gi|19560561618730.44.5369000.1070.2030.234
645VFB1 (VIER F-BOX PROTEINE 1) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522013056459.98.9354000.0570.060.316
45CHLOROPLAST HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 70-2 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1524057876949.75.174980.0420.2420.0320.2460.048
84ATPDIL1-1 (PDI-LIKE 1-1) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|3068752154125.44.972070.0670.5140.0960.750.122
93chaperonin HSP60 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|292477355218.95.31600.1380.3750.0870.090.325
96chaperonin HSP60 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1622161312.35.663340.6480.2960.1660.10.072
123HSP60-3A Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1840019560428.85.853450.2061.30.370.0780.031
214Tat binding protein like protein Brassica rapa gi|1269758947448.34.915860.4620.2730.1650.1040.045
542senescence-associated cysteine protease Brassica oleracea gi|1814128939309.35.47180000.0470.1740.175
566PAA2 (20S PROTEASOME SUBUNIT PAA2) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522499327332.85.75363000.1250.1480.225
569PAA2 (20S PROTEASOME SUBUNIT PAA2) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522499327332.85.75384000.060.1650.164
586PAB1 (PROTEASOME SUBUNIT PAB1) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1521925725685.35.53249000.0930.8050.232
590chaperonin 10 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|305715026912.58.86158000.060.5430.118
597endopeptidase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523182426960.94.734000.0650.1160.342
600chaperonin 10 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|305715026912.58.86245000.0340.340.233
502putative proteasome 20S beta1 subunit Brassica napus gi|4135268318942.67.71625000.0720.0980.099
706RPP3A (60S acidic ribosomal protein P3) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523602911841.64.4270000.1090.40.157
699immunophilin Arabidopsis thaliana gi|127240817675.94.971000.3030.3540.379
406cyclase family protein Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1841859829968.65.641600.0660.4030.3060.2340.158
608putative chloroplast nucleoid DNA-binding protein Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1942410653186.55.2698000.2680.2450.27
675peotidylprolyl isomerase ROC4 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2155583128178.18.83144000.2750.3950
4. Energy
131Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|211573299517676.041400.1340.6290.1450.7410.041
219Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|3068799948469.47.55640.0940.1470.6120.0780.055
330Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase Hevea brasiliensis gi|16899736120732.28.44610.2880.890.8080.2490.045
135mitochondrial F1 ATP synthase beta subunit Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1793984963331.86.525390.4830.0940.1170.160.704
304chloroplast rubisco activase Cucumis sativus gi|239837354668414.493150.1340.1690.0540.3451.247
490oxygen-evolving complex (OEC) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2159322035136.65.55543000.091.440.876
609adenosine kinase 2 (ADK2) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1524271737821.85.14118000.0870.3140.078
281adenosine kinase 2 (ADK2) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1524271737821.85.144650.1470.2750.0520.2470.27
612oxygen-evolving complex (OEC) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|10763731433.79.7168000.3030.1030.09
633PSBP-1 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|18647820723744.27.71112000.1440.3640.598
677water-soluble chlorophyll protein Brassica oleracea gi|2753088122720.97.8366000.0590.3370.09
682water-soluble chlorophyll protein Brassica oleracea gi|2753088122720.97.83237000.0790.1770.138
159ATPase subunit 1 Brassica napus gi|11225390055096.86.012750.0830.2330.5510.2240.034
529PSBO2 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523032434997.75.92371000.2440.2440.269
631PSBP-1 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|18647820723744.27.71112000.1630.4860.185
627OEE2 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|10763731433.79.7196000.4690.6130.762
280adenosine kinase 2 (ADK2) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1524271737821.85.141980.2480.450.1670.1440.107
5. Oxidation/Detoxification
324peroxidase POA1 Capsicum annuum gi|7253413431852.98.43760.2450.4930.8810.0670.106
339peroxidase POA1 Capsicum annuum gi|7253413431852.98.43790.0640.1260.6080.170.05
393peroxidase 27 (PER27) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523205834927.99.166500.80.070.10.04
705glutathione peroxidase, putative Ricinus communis gi|25553744718546.46.58161000.2880.3110.385
446disulfide oxidoreductase, putative Ricinus communis gi|25557523739320.18.2243000.2160.1130.091
719copper/zinc superoxide dismutase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|327375322161.26.28169000.0810.280
688CCH (COPPER CHAPERONE) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522886912962.64.91112000.1890.3791.86
605GSH-dependent dehydroascorbate reductase 1 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|2159305623406.4645000.190.3140.532
405ascorbate peroxidase Brassica oleracea gi|1826537927657.95.582560.5090.9630.0790.9580.15
584APX1 (ascorbate peroxidase 1) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522304927543.85.72224000.3890.2440.15
575cytochrome P450 monooxygenase Selaginella moellendorffii gi|15781261556837.78.5380000.0350.1580.13
711type 2 peroxiredoxin Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523171824668.99.12250000.2140.8340.148
702type 2 peroxiredoxin Brassica rapa gi|492847217421.15.37471000.2090.4790.075
700type 2 peroxiredoxin Brassica rapa gi|492847217421.15.37289000.2550.7620.047
6. Secondary metabolism
645(R)-limonene synthase, putative Ricinus communis gi|255587781678865.8790000.0440.0630.316
652(R)-limonene synthase, putative Ricinus communis gi|255587781678865.8765000.0450.3820.155
657(R)-limonene synthase, putative Ricinus communis gi|255587781678865.8780000.040.6330.61
671(R)-limonene synthase, putative Ricinus communis gi|255587781678865.8765000.0620.5520.221
301CAD9 (CINNAMYL ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE 9) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523502238908.66.211550.4170.20.9170.2440.063
545caffeoyl-CoA 3-O-methyltransferase Brassica rapa gi|9169437129005.85.21221000.0330.1280.143
454zeta-carotene desaturase Zea mays gi|19565453563050.57.5379000.2190.1360.1
713phenylalanine amonnia lyase Populus trichocarpa gi|22410978477644.75.8360000.1240.6820.052
7. Transcription
223reverse transcriptase Oryza sativa gi|62733278161394.66.84520.1310.2360.8590.2090.055
502myb family transcription factor Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523386423097.56.9253000.0720.0980.099
607transcription factor APF1 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1350702530034.56.2459000.1640.2620.032
271histone acetyltransferase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1841009863084.26.01490.1850.2650.6570.1520.125
8. Transportors
560ATSAR1B (SECRETION-ASSOCIATED RAS 1 B) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522351621972.46.5264000.110.3950.069
476AKT2/3 (arabidopsis potassium transport 2/3) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1841586491249.96.09189000.0180.070.111
9. Cell structure
241actin-1 Diospyros kaki gi|25529184735616.15.573900.1210.2680.170.1010.083
519kinesin motor domain containing protein Oryza sativa gi|77556349316424.4549000.0440.3460.11
318RGP4 (REVERSIBLY GLYCOSYLATED POLYPEPTIDE 4) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|15241258418396.562090.1891.563.130.3130.109
252actin1 Actinidia deliciosa gi|149938964416375.316250.5890.2280.5040.2760.118
10. Signal transduction
541annexin Arabidopsis thaliana gi|142920735757.25.262000.0570.8740.161
88calreticulin 2 (CRT2/1) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1521745948127.14.371091.030.6490.2210.120.07
424receptor protein kinase CLAVATA1 Ricinus communis gi|255565085105782.57.53650.220.3310.4150.8391.092
478pas/lov protein B (PLPB) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|3067802044660.46.6880000.2370.8710.345
574phosphoprotein phosphatase 2A Arabidopsis thaliana gi|62321445360645.3276000.0490.70.109
674calcineurin B-like protein 5 variant Oryza sativa gi|22673183922525.45.4859000.1250.3940.599
95calreticulin Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1009712465544.37570.2260.240.452.30.97
699calcium-dependent protein kinase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522900264506.48.8456000.390.3030.341
11. Disease and defense
138imidazoleglycerol-phosphate synthase Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1523690564152.96.312740.030.170.2770.0460.041
392lesion initiation 2 (LIN2) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|24025400043768.76.244871.520.5950.2710.1561.483
394putative gag-pol precursor Oryza sativa gi|1690518977155.98.74780.4020.1360.2050.3350.1
512metacaspase 2 (ATMC2) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|4256713445781.15.3756000.0830.480.056
568NHO1 (nonhost resistance to P.s.phaseolicola 1) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|7932153652449.76.1164000.1430.4322.25
665NHO1 (nonhost resistance to P.s.phaseolicola 1) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|7932153652449.76.1179000.070.4460.209
792putative blight resistance protein Oryza sativa gi|57899196138160.76.78830.0930.5910.1140.0820
586At2G37660 Arabidopsis thaliana gi|22720445526279.85.29250000.0930.8060.169
662heat stress-induced protein Brassica oleracea gi|331964623474.38.37139000.0490.1660.82
192heat stress-induced protein Brassica oleracea gi|331964623474.38.372240.5290.2130.170.1150.051
659nonhost resistance to P.s. phaseolicola1 (NHO1) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|7932153652449.76.1178000.0710.4960.414
171aldehyde dehydrogenase 2B4 (ALDH2B4) Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1522831958552.17.11275000.1770.3170.057
12. Transposon 00.0340.2430.3220.417
554retrotransposon protein,putative Oryza sativa gi|110288898112022.18.5748000.0350.340.074
349retrotransposon protein,putative Oryza sativa gi|775521112256118.486000.2610.0680.0950.26
637retrotransposon protein, putative, unclassified Oryza sativa gi|108709588253746.67.6265000.2120.1170.065
13. DNA repair
223reverse transcriptase Oryza sativa gi|62733278161394.66.84900.1310.1460.8590.2090.055
158DNA repair protein RAD23,putative Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1524092240041.14.581900.1060.2721.1570.1810.045
160DNA repair protein RAD23,putative Arabidopsis thaliana gi|14533466934690.54.851750.1350.4590.1890.1670.258
147RAD23-like protein Arabidopsis thaliana gi|3040972636198.24.661100.1810.1730.0410.1950.128
14. Storage
540cruciferin Brassica napus gi|16713655973.26.84198000.0360.1450.083
558napin Brassica napus gi|468018203296.88135000.1320.2580.067
461cruciferin Brassica napus gi|1275130254349.68.13138000.2160.2450.222
15. Unclear classification
795stem-specific protein TSJT1 Zea mays gi|22649999427943.77.624500.0730.9170.5190.165
602RNA recognition motif (RRM)-containing protein Arabidopsis thaliana gi|3069359527731.48.9433000.0750.0870.2
299acid phosphatase survival protein SurE Arabidopsis thaliana gi|1841434234099.85.051080.3360.2030.3490.1510.098
16. Unknown
634unkown Populus trichocarpa gi|11848280543503.16.224900.0340.1180.0670.377
566unknown Picea sitchensis gi|224284385120613.45.8955000.1250.2550.04
Figure 2

A representative image showing spot identification and localization of proteins from developing Brassica campestri L. seeds.

Those spots indicated by arrows were excised from 2-D gels and analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS/MS. 209 proteins spots that have been identified are indexed as numbered, and the complete list of proteins is in the Table 1.

Figure 3

Functional classification of identified seed proteins of Brassica campestri L.

The changed protein spots were identified by MALDI-TOF/TOF MS, and classified into 16 groups according to their functions using the NCBI da0ase. Out of a total of 209 identified proteins (red), 147 had nonredundant function (blue). The number above the bar indicates the proportion of each group of protein.

A representative image showing spot identification and localization of proteins from developing Brassica campestri L. seeds.

Those spots indicated by arrows were excised from 2-D gels and analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS/MS. 209 proteins spots that have been identified are indexed as numbered, and the complete list of proteins is in the Table 1.

Protein Abundance Profiles of Each Functional Class

To characterize global abundance kinetics of proteins involved in different processes, composite expression profiles were generated by summing protein abundance, expressed as relative volume [17], [30], [31], of each functional class over the five development stages. As shown in Figure 4, relative abundances of metabolic proteins fluctuated along the experimental period, reflecting different metabolic activity during the embryo maturation. Abundance of those responsible for protein synthesis, destination and second metabolism decreased during early seed growth, but increased and reached the top at the 25 DAP before a second reduction. Disease- and defense-related proteins were highly abundant at the late stage of seed development, and those involved in energy production, oxidation and detoxification, signal transduction, transposition, storage and transportation shared very similar patterns which increased and reached the summit at 25 DAP, whereas proteins related to cell structure, transcription, DNA repair and continued to accumulate and had the highest abundance at 20 DAP (Figure 4). Generally, it’s very interesting to find most of the protein groups possessed relatively higher abundance at a stage from 20 DAP to 25 DAP, reflecting extensive cellular activities during the processes of seed development.
Figure 4

Composite protein abundance profiles of each functional categories.

The combined accumulation profiles were calculated as the sum of expression value of all the proteins in each category (y axis) at each developmental stage (x axis).

Functional classification of identified seed proteins of Brassica campestri L.

The changed protein spots were identified by MALDI-TOF/TOF MS, and classified into 16 groups according to their functions using the NCBI da0ase. Out of a total of 209 identified proteins (red), 147 had nonredundant function (blue). The number above the bar indicates the proportion of each group of protein.

Hierarchical Clustering Analyses of Seed Proteins

To further improve the understanding of the identified proteins, abundance profiles were analyzed by hierarchical clustering. Finally, we generated a total of eight cluster groups (c1, c2, c3, c4, c5, c6, c7 and c8) that displayed similar dynamics (Table 2 and Figure 5), suggesting complicated regulatory patterns of these identified proteins during the seed development. The largest group contained 64 proteins (c4), expression of which increased from the early stage of seed development and reached the top at the 25 DAP but decreased at the late stage (35 DAP). The second group included 46 proteins (c7), and most of them were not detected until 16 DAP and were highly accumulated even at 35 DAP, different from those in the group of c1. The smallest cluster, c6, had only four proteins which displayed U-type expression profiles (Figure 5). Clusters c1 and c3 consisted of 28 and 30 proteins, which had the highest abundance at 16 DAP and 20 DAP, respectively. Seventeen proteins were grouped into the c8, and their abundance remained reducing along the seed growth. Notably, most of the proteins involved in primary metabolism, energy production, protein destination and oxidation were included into the c4 group (Figure 5 and Table 2), suggesting these cellular activities are essential for the early-stage seed development.
Table 2

Hierarchical clusters of differentially accumulated seed proteins and distribution of the proteins belonging to each category in different clusters.

CategoriesC1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8Total
1. Primary Metabolism15210165210767
2. Protein processing/destination633133114649
3. Energy2236004017
4. Oxidation and Detoxification2135003014
5. Disease and Defense1015112112
6. Protein synthesis000410319
7. Signal transduction000400318
8. Secondary metabolism002400208
9. Cell structure101110004
10. Transcription002100104
11. DNA repair103000004
12. Transposon011100003
13. Storage000200103
14. Transporter000100102
15. Unclear classification001000113
16. Unknown000100102
Total28930641144617209
Figure 5

Abundance profiles of eight hierarchical clusters (c1–c8).

The profiles were established by the protein expression value (vertical axis) at each developmental stage (horizontal axis). The expression level of the differentially accumulated proteins within each cluster is shown. Each colored line represents a protein identity.

Composite protein abundance profiles of each functional categories.

The combined accumulation profiles were calculated as the sum of expression value of all the proteins in each category (y axis) at each developmental stage (x axis).

Abundance profiles of eight hierarchical clusters (c1–c8).

The profiles were established by the protein expression value (vertical axis) at each developmental stage (horizontal axis). The expression level of the differentially accumulated proteins within each cluster is shown. Each colored line represents a protein identity.

Discussion

Proteins Associated with Metabolism and Protein Renewal are Prevalent in the Developing Seed

Currently, a large number of proteomic studies have been carried out in different species to understand seed development [11], [32]. Most of these studies, both in embryo-dominant seeds and endosperm dominant seeds, identify the largest group of proteins involved in metabolism, which is consistent with the rapid and complicated metabolic changes during seed development [12]. Our analysis revealed similar character that a proportion of 32.1% total identified proteins participated in primary metabolism (Figure 3). For example, for the enzymes involved in the glycolytic pathway, 7 of them were identified as 15 protein spots. Besides, five enzymes of TCA pathway and three enzymes in lipid biosynthesis were identified (Table 1). An obvious pattern shared by these enzymes is their accumulation remained increasing over five stages of seed development (Figure 5), indicating these metabolic pathways were increasingly required for the seed development. Many proteins with altered expression in our analysis were related to other metabolic events, like amino acid metabolism. In addition, proteins associating with energy and metabolism, defense, oxidation/detoxification were prevalent in the developing seed (Table 1). Interestingly, one transcript study on Arabidopsis embryo development indicates that transition from globular to torpedo stage is associated with up-regulation of genes involved in energetics and metabolism [33], which is consistent to our proteomic study. Abundance of these proteins probably suggests that their activities defined the basal requirement during seed development. Our data revealed 23.4% total proteins (25.9% of nonredundant proteins) were involved in protein processing and destination (Figure 3). They were those molecular chaperons that helped protein folding of newly synthesized proteins (spot 42, 53, 73), those isomerases that functioned in changing protein conformation (spot 353, 328, 406 and 675), the ubiquitin proteasome group including 20S, 26S proteasome subunits (spot 91, 464, 592, and 569), and those proteases (spot 328, 576 and 406), suggesting important protein turnover and rearrangements during seed development. Ubiquitination-mediated degradation pathway plays an important role in various aspects of plant growth and development [34]. Polyubiquitinylation of substrates is achieved through the action of three enzymes: E1, ubiquitin-activating enzyme, E2, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, and E3, ubiquitin ligase that determines the specificity of the substrate. The modified protein is then processed by the 26S proteasome, which consists of a core 20S protease capped at each of its ends by a regulatory 19S complex [35]. In our analysis, four isoforms of E1 and eight proteasome components were observed (Table 1). Folding of nascent polypeptides into functional proteins is controlled by a number of molecular chaperones and protein-folding catalysts. Our analysis revealed 6 different isoforms of protein disulphide isomerases, an endoplasmic reticulum-located protein that catalyzes the formation, isomerization, and reduction/oxidation of disulfide bonds [36]. Seven chaperonins or chaperones were also observed, including the plant homolog of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain binding protein (BiP), which is an endoplasmic reticulum- localized member of the heat shock 70 family. BiP has been proposed to play a role in protein body assembly within the endoplasmic reticulum [37], [38]. These proteins displayed different accumulation patterns in the process of seed development. For example, spot 73 was identified as a protein disulfide isomerase that continued to accumulate and reached the highest at 20 DAP. Consistent with this in the transcript level, our gene expression analysis also revealed disulfide isomerase can be detected at the late stage of embryogenesis [39]. Plant cysteine proteases are important for organ senescence, plant defense and nutrient mobilization during seed germination [40], and previous studies reveal cysteine proteinases are up-regulated in various senescing plants, such as Arabidopsis, B. napus, and Nicotiana tabacum [41]. In this study, we identified spot 542 as senescence-associated cysteine protease, and spot 576 as another cysteine proteinase that increased its abundance all over the five stages (Figure 5), suggesting that cysteine proteinase also played an important role in maturation and senescence of seed growth. Altered accumulation of these proteins indicated active protein production and elimination occurred in the process of seed development, which might serve as a monitoring mechanism over those intricate processes of metabolism and energy production. It’s also highly likely that the accumulation of these proteins may be used during rapid cell division and cell structure construction. Despite of these, preponderance of these proteins seemed to be particular of our study, because few of previous reports has indicated so many proteins with similar function [13], [42]–[44], which make us underestimate the importance of protein self-renewal. Therefore, protein renewal could be an essential regulatory mechanism for seed development.

Carbon Assimilation During Seed Development

The developing oilseeds take up sugars and amino acids from the surrounding endosome liquid and synthesize large quantities of triacylglycerol storage proteins. Previous work characterizes carbon assimilation during seed filling in Brassica napus and castor, both of which are oil plants [17], [45]. It’s interesting to examine this important metabolism pathway in the seed development. It has been demonstrated that glycolysis supplies most carbon to fatty acid synthesis (FAS) in rapeseed developing embryos in culture [46], suggesting glycolysis is essential for carbon assimilation in the developing seeds, but relatively little is known about its regulation and control, and due to the parallel pathways operated in both the cytosol and plastids, it become more complex in plants [47], [48]. Our study revealed a large number of protein spots corresponding to numerous different glycolytic enzymes both in the cytosol and plastids. FBA catalyzes the aldol cleavage of Fru-1,6-bisP to glyceraldehydes-3-P (GAP) and dihydroxyacetone phosphate(DHAP), and three cytosolic FBA spots were identified in this study (spot 333, 345 and 348) and their expression profiles are different from each other during the development (Figure 6). Triose-P isomerase (TPI) catalyzes the interconversion of GAP and DHAP and eight TPI (spot 588, 589, 573, 583, 560, 591, 592 and 557), with three in cytosol and five in plastid, were identified (Figure 6). Interestingly, their accumulation was relatively higher at the late stages of seed development. Glyceraldehyde 3-P dehydrogenase (GAPDH) reversibly catalyzes the conversion of GAP into 1,3-bisPGA, and two cytosolic spots (spot 346 and 360) of GAPDH with different expression were identified (Figure 6). Two cytosolic forms of 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglyceratemutase (iPGAM) (spot 66 and 71) and two phosphoglycerate kinase spots (PGK) (spot 332 and 336) were separately identified (Figure 6). In addition, five enolases (spot 452, 248, 139, 127 and 132) and malate dehydrogenase (MDH) (spot 347, 350, 355, 423 and 446) and most of them are cytosolic (Figure 6). It is notable their expression peaked at different seed growth stages, suggesting their importance at different development time. Consistent with a proteomic analysis of seed filling in B. napus which suggests that sugar mobilization from glucose to coenzyme A and its acyl derivative is a collaboration between the cytosol and plastids, and temporal control of enzymes and pathways extends beyond transcription [17], the detection of multiple isoelectric species for cytosolic and plastidial glycolytic enzymes indicated balanced coordination between cytosolic and plastidial glycolysis during seed development.
Figure 6

Characterization of central carbon metabolism in developing seed of Brassica campestri L.

Proteins involved in sugar metabolism that provide carbon sources for biosynthetic pathways are shown (red). The × axis shows each of the five stages and the y axis shows the relative volume of identified proteins. Abbreviations for metabolites: UDP-G, UDP-Glc; G-1-P, Glc 1 phosphate; G-6-P, Glc 6 phosphate; F-6-P, Fru 6 phosphate; F-1,6-bP, Fru 1,6 bis phosphate; GAP, glyceraldehyde 3-P; DHAP, dihydroxyacetone phosphate; 1,3-bPGA, 1,3 bis phosphoglyceric acid; 3-PGA, 3 phosphoglyceric acid; 2-PGA, 2 phosphoglyceric acid; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate. Abbreviations for enzymes: PGI, phosphoglucose isomerase; PFK, pyrophosphate-dependent phosphofructokinase; FBA, Fru bisphosphate aldolase; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-P dehydrogenase; TPI, triose-phosphate isomerase; PGK, phosphoglyceratekinase; iPGAM, 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase; PRK, phosphoribulokinase; Rubisco, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase; PK, pyruvate kinase; PDH, pyruvate dehydrogenase; MDH, malate dehydrogenase.

Characterization of central carbon metabolism in developing seed of Brassica campestri L.

Proteins involved in sugar metabolism that provide carbon sources for biosynthetic pathways are shown (red). The × axis shows each of the five stages and the y axis shows the relative volume of identified proteins. Abbreviations for metabolites: UDP-G, UDP-Glc; G-1-P, Glc 1 phosphate; G-6-P, Glc 6 phosphate; F-6-P, Fru 6 phosphate; F-1,6-bP, Fru 1,6 bis phosphate; GAP, glyceraldehyde 3-P; DHAP, dihydroxyacetone phosphate; 1,3-bPGA, 1,3 bis phosphoglyceric acid; 3-PGA, 3 phosphoglyceric acid; 2-PGA, 2 phosphoglyceric acid; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate. Abbreviations for enzymes: PGI, phosphoglucose isomerase; PFK, pyrophosphate-dependent phosphofructokinase; FBA, Fru bisphosphate aldolase; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-P dehydrogenase; TPI, triose-phosphate isomerase; PGK, phosphoglyceratekinase; iPGAM, 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase; PRK, phosphoribulokinase; Rubisco, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase; PK, pyruvate kinase; PDH, pyruvate dehydrogenase; MDH, malate dehydrogenase.

Possible Seed Development-specific Proteins Indicated by This Study

In our analysis, four spots were identified to be proteins related to cell structure, taking a proportion of only 1.9% of total proteins (Figure 3). This is obviously lower than previous studies on seed development in Arabidopsis [16] or B. napus [18], which often identifies similar proteins of about 20%. Protein level of spot 318, RGP4, continued increasing from the beginning of seed development until at 16 DAP, and could be hardly detected at the late stage (Figure 5), suggesting it might be a novel protein associating with seed development. This is consistent with recent report that expression of RGP4 was restricted in seed and important for development [49]. Such proteins as Actin1 (spot 241, 252) has been found to be highly dynamic in nearly every development stages of seed development, highlighting their importance. Despite these studies use different materials of different development stages, the relative low proportion of proteins contributing to cell structure in this report may suggest another novel character specific to B. campestris seed development. Our analysis identified only two storage proteins: napin (spot 558) and cruciferin (spot 461 and 540 ), which are the two major storage proteins in rape seed (B. napus), and constitute 20% and 60% of the total protein in mature seeds [50]. As has been reported that their biological synthesis begins early from the expansion phase of embryo development [51]. Consistent with their roles as “molecular marker” of late embryogenesis, both proteins were found to continually accumulate over the five embryo development stages and reach the highest level in the last stage (Figure 5). In our parallel gene expression analysis, napin gene was found to be up-regulated obviously during embryogenesis and expressed highly only in late embryo stage, but it was not detected in the globular embryo stage [39]. Interestingly, few of previous embryo-related proteomic studies have reported storage protein of napin, in contrast to that cruciferin is frequently detected. Expression of a novel protein, AKT2/3 (spot 476), increased in the early stage of seed development and began to decrease after 20 DAP (Figure 5). In Arabidopsis, AKT2/3 encodes photosynthate- and light-dependent inward rectifying potassium channel with unique gating properties that are regulated by phosphorylation [52], [53]. Therefore, identification of AKT2/3 suggested its novel role in seed development. Another interesting finding comes from an unclassified protein TSJT1 (spot 795), which has been indicated as stem-specific and found in gene chip data [54]. During seed development, it was very highly expressed early at 10 DAP, but after 20 DAP, its protein significantly decreased (Table 2 and Figure 5), therefore, our analysis indicates it may be important for early seed development, which remains to be determined by further experiment. An investigation on seed development should significantly enrich our knowledge on the molecular and physiological events in whole seed growth process. In this study, we explored the protein dynamics over five stages during B. campestri seed development using a proteomic approach. A total of 209 proteins were identified by mass spectrometry to be differentially seed development and they could be classified into 16 functional groups. It was found that proteins participating in metabolism, energy production, oxidation/detoxification as well as stress/defense were highly dynamic in abundance. However, expressed during functional assignment of these altered proteins uncovers unexpected abundance of proteins related to protein processing and destination, highlighting the importance of protein renewal in seed development, and proportion of those associated to cell structure was rather low compared to previous proteomic analysis of seed development. Our study provides important information to better understanding the seed development in oil plant.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials and Sample Collection

Brassica campestri L. (cv. Jianghuangzhong) plants were grown in soil-based compost under natural conditions (Wuhan, China). Before flowering, nylon nettings were used to prevent pollen contamination. For sampling seeds in different developmental stages, flowers were tagged immediately after opening of buds, and development of seeds was monitored by checking the embryos under a dissecting microscope. Harvesting the developing seeds was performed at precisely 10, 16, 20, 25 and 35 days after pollination (DAP) when their embryos were at the globular embryo stage, heart stage, torpedo stage, bended-cotyledon stage and C-shaped mature embryo, respectively. Five grams of seeds in each stage were sampled. Then they were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for use.

Protein Extraction

One gram of seed samples were grounded with mortar and pestle into fine powder in liquid nitrogen, then they were immediately homogenized with ice-cold extraction buffer (8 M Urea, 2 M Thiourea, 4% w/v CHAPS, 40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) containing protease inhibitors (1 mM PMSF, 10 mM DTT). The supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 20000 g for 30 min at 4°C. Then the pellet was resuspended in ice-cold lysis buffer and centrifuged as described above. After the oil above the supernatant was removed, proteins in the supernatant were precipitated with five volumes of ice-cold trichloroacetic acidacetone (12.5% trichloroacetic acid in 100% acetone) at −20°C for 2 h and then collected by centrifugation at 20000 g for 30 min. The pellet proteins were resuspended in 80% ice-cold acetone containing 20 mM DTT and centrifuged as above for two times before they were dried by vacuum. The obtained proteins were dissolved in lysis buffer (8 M urea, 4% CHAPS, 10 mM DTT, and 2% pharmalyte 4–7) at room temperature, then vortexed vigorously and centrifuged. The final supernatants were transferred to fresh tubes. The protein concentration was quantified according to the Bradford method [55] using UV-2000 UV-visible spectrophotometry (UNICO) with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the protein concentration standard. The final protein samples were stored at −70°C for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE).

Two-dimensional Electrophoresis (2-DE)

For protein identification, one milligram protein samples in 450 µl rehydration solution containing 8 M Urea, 4% (w/v) CHAPS, 0.5% (v/v) IPG buffer (pH 4–7) (GE Healthcare), 20 mM DTT and 0.002% w/v bromphenol blue were loaded onto 24 cm IPG strips (pH 4–7) (GE Healthcare) after brief sonication and centrifugation. Isoelectric focusing (IEF) was performed at 100 V (1 h), 300 V (1 h), 500 V (1 h), 1000V (1 h) and 8000V (12 h) using the Ettan™ IPGphor III ™ Isoelectric Focusing System (GE Healthcare). Before the second dimension, strips were equilibrated in the buffer containing 6 M urea, 75 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 30% (v/v) glycerol, 2% (v/v) SDS, 0.002% (w/v) bromophenol blue and 10 mg/ml DTT for 15 min, then in 25 mg/ml iodoacetamide (15 min) for a second equilibration step. For the second dimension, proteins were separated on 12.5% SDS acrylamide gels (26×20×0.1 cm) at 2.5 W/gel for 45 min, then at 15W/gel for 5 h using the Ettan DALT six System (GE Healthcare). For each development stage, three gels were run and then stained with Coomassie brilliant blue dye (CBB R-250) [56] and the experiment was repeated three times with similar results.

Imaging and Statistical Analysis

2-DE gels stained by CBB were scanned at a resolution of 300 dpi and 16-bit pixel depth and then analyzed by ImageMaster 2-D Platinum 6.0 software (GE Healthcare) according to protocols provided by the manufacturer. After automatic spot detection, manual spot editing was carried out. Spots matching in at least two out of three gels for each protein extraction were considered as reproducible spots and included in the synthetic 2-DE gel images. Spot matching was further confirmed by visual inspection. To determine the differences in protein abundance across distinct 2-DE gels, the normalized/relative protein spot volume (area multiplied by stain intensity) calculated by the ImageMaster 2-D Platinum 6.0 software (GE Healthcare) was used as the parameter, and protein spots with changes more than two folds (P<0.05) by statistic analysis were considered as differentially accumulated. Then, significantly dynamic spots (P<0.05) were re-examined by eye detection to include only the most obviously varying spots over different stages for further study.

Protein Identification by MALDI-TOF/TOF MS

Dynamically accumulated protein spots among five developmental stages were manually excised from 2-D identification gels and digested with trypsin (Promega). Each dried peptide mixture was dissolved into a volume of 50% ACN/0.1% TFA according to its relative abundance in the gel. Then the salts and detergents were removed using Millipore C18 ZipTips (Millipore). Bound peptides were eluted from ZipTip with approximately 3 µl 60% methanol/3% formic acid. 0.5 µl sample solution or calibration standard was then mixed with equal volume of CHCA (a-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid) matrix (10 mg/ml CHCA in 50% ACN/0.1% TFA) and spotted onto a freshly cleaned target plate. After air drying, the crystallized spots were analyzed by MALDI-TOF/TOF (4800 Plus Analyzer, Applied Biosystems). Parent mass peaks were scanned in 1000 laser shots with a mass range of 800∼4000 Da after calibration. The minimum signal to noise ratio was 10. Five parent mass peaks with most intensity were picked out for tandem TOF/TOF analysis, each with 1500 laser shots. The searching parameters were set as follows: carbamidomethylation (C) and oxidation (M) as variable modifications, up to one missed cleavage, precursor ion tolerance at 200 ppm, and fragment ion tolerance at 0.3 Da and peptide charge of 1+. Protein hits with protein scores C. I.% (confident identification percentage, based on combined mass and mass/mass spectra) over 95 were reserved. Most identified proteins also have total ion score C. I.% (based on mass/mass spectra) over 95. Spectra combined mass and mass/mass were searched against an NCBInr protein database, taxonomy Viridiplantae (Green Plants) by GPS Explorer™ Workstation (Applied Biosystems).

Hierarchical Cluster Analysis

Gene Cluster 3.0/TreeView software was used to do the clustering based on the mean relative volume of each protein spot. Clustering is based on visual inspection of relative similarities or differences between different cluster ranges and the number of clusters was chosen when the dynamics of functional categories between clusters possesses the most significant difference.
  52 in total

Review 1.  Apical-basal pattern formation in Arabidopsis embryogenesis.

Authors:  G Jürgens
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-07-16       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Embryogenesis in Higher Plants: An Overview.

Authors:  MAL. West; J. J. Harada
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Proteome analysis of pod and seed development in the model legume Lotus japonicus.

Authors:  Gitte Nautrup-Pedersen; Svend Dam; Brian S Laursen; Astrid L Siegumfeldt; Kasper Nielsen; Nicolas Goffard; Hans Henrik Stærfeldt; Carsten Friis; Shusei Sato; Satoshi Tabata; Andrea Lorentzen; Peter Roepstorff; Jens Stougaard
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 4.  Proteome and proteomics: new technologies, new concepts, and new words.

Authors:  N L Anderson; N G Anderson
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Phylogenetic analyses identify 10 classes of the protein disulfide isomerase family in plants, including single-domain protein disulfide isomerase-related proteins.

Authors:  Norma L Houston; Chuanzhu Fan; Jenny Qiu-Yun Xiang; Jan-Michael Schulze; Rudolf Jung; Rebecca S Boston
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Microarray analysis of developing Arabidopsis seeds.

Authors:  T Girke; J Todd; S Ruuska; J White; C Benning; J Ohlrogge
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  The interconversion of UDP-arabinopyranose and UDP-arabinofuranose is indispensable for plant development in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Carsten Rautengarten; Berit Ebert; Thomas Herter; Christopher J Petzold; Tadashi Ishii; Aindrila Mukhopadhyay; Björn Usadel; Henrik Vibe Scheller
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  In-depth investigation of the soybean seed-filling proteome and comparison with a parallel study of rapeseed.

Authors:  Ganesh Kumar Agrawal; Martin Hajduch; Katherine Graham; Jay J Thelen
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Molecular characterization of a senescence-associated gene encoding cysteine proteinase and its gene expression during leaf senescence in sweet potato.

Authors:  Guan-Hong Chen; Lin-Tzu Huang; Mee-Ngan Yap; Ruey-Hua Lee; Yih-Jong Huang; Ming-Chih Cheng; Shu-Chen Grace Chen
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.927

10.  The proteome of seed development in the model legume Lotus japonicus.

Authors:  Svend Dam; Brian S Laursen; Jane H Ornfelt; Bjarne Jochimsen; Hans Henrik Staerfeldt; Carsten Friis; Kasper Nielsen; Nicolas Goffard; Søren Besenbacher; Lene Krusell; Shusei Sato; Satoshi Tabata; Ida B Thøgersen; Jan J Enghild; Jens Stougaard
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 8.340

View more
  9 in total

1.  A comparative glycoproteome study of developing endosperm in the hexose-deficient miniature1 (mn1) seed mutant and its wild type Mn1 in maize.

Authors:  Cecilia Silva-Sanchez; Sixue Chen; Jinxi Li; Prem S Chourey
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.753

2.  Proteomics technique opens new frontiers in mobilome research.

Authors:  Andrew D Davidson; David A Matthews; Kevin Maringer
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2017-08-01

3.  Proteomics informed by transcriptomics for characterising active transposable elements and genome annotation in Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  Kevin Maringer; Amjad Yousuf; Kate J Heesom; Jun Fan; David Lee; Ana Fernandez-Sesma; Conrad Bessant; David A Matthews; Andrew D Davidson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Immature Seed Endosperm and Embryo Proteomics of the Lotus (Nelumbo Nucifera Gaertn.) by One-Dimensional Gel-Based Tandem Mass Spectrometry and a Comparison with the Mature Endosperm Proteome.

Authors:  Carlo F Moro; Yoichiro Fukao; Junko Shibato; Randeep Rakwal; Ganesh Kumar Agrawal; Seiji Shioda; Yoshiaki Kouzuma; Masami Yonekura
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2015-08-14

5.  Seed Metabolism and Pathogen Resistance Enhancement in Pisum sativum During Colonization of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi: An Integrative Metabolomics-Proteomics Approach.

Authors:  Nima Ranjbar Sistani; Getinet Desalegn; Hans-Peter Kaul; Stefanie Wienkoop
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Genome-wide analysis of coordinated transcript abundance during seed development in different Brassica rapa morphotypes.

Authors:  Ram Kumar Basnet; Natalia Moreno-Pachon; Ke Lin; Johan Bucher; Richard G F Visser; Chris Maliepaard; Guusje Bonnema
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Proteomic analysis of embryogenesis and the acquisition of seed dormancy in Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.).

Authors:  Aleksandra Maria Staszak; Tomasz Andrzej Pawłowski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Differential abundance analysis of mesocarp protein from high- and low-yielding oil palms associates non-oil biosynthetic enzymes to lipid biosynthesis.

Authors:  Tony Eng Keong Ooi; Wan Chin Yeap; Leona Daniela Jeffery Daim; Boon Zean Ng; Fong Chin Lee; Ainul Masni Othman; David Ross Appleton; Fook Tim Chew; Harikrishna Kulaveerasingam
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  Maintaining Genome Integrity during Seed Development in Phaseolus vulgaris L.: Evidence from a Transcriptomic Profiling Study.

Authors:  José Ricardo Parreira; Alma Balestrazzi; Pedro Fevereiro; Susana de Sousa Araújo
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.