Literature DB >> 23188742

Magnitude effects for experienced rewards at short delays in the escalating interest task.

Michael E Young1, Tara L Webb, Steven C Sutherland, Eric A Jacobs.   

Abstract

A first-person shooter video game was adapted for the study of choice between smaller sooner and larger later rewards. Participants chose when to fire a weapon that increased in damage potential over a short interval. When the delay to maximum damage was shorter (5-8 s), people showed greater sensitivity to the consequences of their choices than when the delay was longer (17-20 s). Participants also evidenced a magnitude effect by waiting proportionally longer when the damage magnitudes were doubled for all rewards. The experiment replicated the standard magnitude effect with this new video game preparation over time scales similar to those typically used in nonhuman animal studies and without complications due to satiation or cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23188742      PMCID: PMC3594385          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0350-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

1.  Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Andrea M Begotka; Bethany R Raiff; Lana L Kastern
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Delay of gratification and delay discounting in rats.

Authors:  Brady Reynolds; Harriet de Wit; Jerry Richards
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2002-09-30       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Subjective probability and delay.

Authors:  H Rachlin; A Raineri; D Cross
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Discounting of monetary and directly consumable rewards.

Authors:  Sara J Estle; Leonard Green; Joel Myerson; Daniel D Holt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-01

5.  The effects of real versus hypothetical reward on delay and probability discounting.

Authors:  Neal S Hinvest; Ian M Anderson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Rich stimulus sampling for between-subjects designs improves model selection.

Authors:  Michael E Young; James J Cole; Steven C Sutherland
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-03

7.  Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward.

Authors:  L Green; J Myerson; E McFadden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09

8.  Are people really more patient than other animals? Evidence from human discounting of real liquid rewards.

Authors:  Koji Jimura; Joel Myerson; Joseph Hilgard; Todd S Braver; Leonard Green
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

Review 9.  The description-experience gap in risky choice.

Authors:  Ralph Hertwig; Ido Erev
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Perceptual accuracy and conflicting effects of certainty on risk-taking behaviour.

Authors:  Sharoni Shafir; Taly Reich; Erez Tsur; Ido Erev; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sensitivity to changing contingencies in an impulsivity task.

Authors:  Michael E Young; Tara L Webb; Jillian M Rung; Eric A Jacobs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Females in the forefront: time-based intervention effects on impulsive choice and interval timing in female rats.

Authors:  Sarah L Stuebing; Andrew T Marshall; Ashton Triplett; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Learning to wait for more likely or just more: greater tolerance to delays of reward with increasingly longer delays.

Authors:  Jillian M Rung; Michael E Young
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.215

4.  Outcome probability versus magnitude: when waiting benefits one at the cost of the other.

Authors:  Michael E Young; Tara L Webb; Jillian M Rung; Anthony W McCoy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sex differences in the inference and perception of causal relations within a video game.

Authors:  Michael E Young
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.