Literature DB >> 23188402

Buddhism and medical futility.

Tuck Wai Chan1, Desley Hegney.   

Abstract

Religious faith and medicine combine harmoniously in Buddhist views, each in its own way helping Buddhists enjoy a more fruitful existence. Health care providers need to understand the spiritual needs of patients in order to provide better care, especially for the terminally ill. Using a recently reported case to guide the reader, this paper examines the issue of medical futility from a Buddhist perspective. Important concepts discussed include compassion, suffering, and the significance of the mind. Compassion from a health professional is essential, and if medical treatment can decrease suffering without altering the clarity of the mind, then a treatment should not be considered futile. Suffering from illness and death, moreover, is considered by Buddhists a normal part of life and is ever-changing. Sickness, old age, birth, and death are integral parts of human life. Suffering is experienced due to the lack of a harmonious state of body, speech, and mind. Buddhists do not believe that the mind is located in the brain, and, for Buddhists, there are ways suffering can be overcome through the control of one's mind.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23188402     DOI: 10.1007/s11673-012-9392-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  7 in total

Review 1.  The empirical basis for determinations of medical futility.

Authors:  Ezra Gabbay; Jose Calvo-Broce; Klemens B Meyer; Thomas A Trikalinos; Joshua Cohen; David M Kent
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Medical futility and the social context.

Authors:  R Halliday
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  The role of doctors' religious faith and ethnicity in taking ethically controversial decisions during end-of-life care.

Authors:  Clive Seale
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Factors associated with do-not-resuscitate orders: patients' preferences, prognoses, and physicians' judgments. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.

Authors:  R B Hakim; J M Teno; F E Harrell; W A Knaus; N Wenger; R S Phillips; P Layde; R Califf; A F Connors; J Lynn
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications.

Authors:  L J Schneiderman; N S Jecker; A R Jonsen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Factors associated with "do not resuscitate" orders and rates of withdrawal from hemodialysis in the international DOPPS.

Authors:  Rachel B Fissell; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Antonio Alberto Lopes; José Miguel Cruz; Shunichi Fukuhara; Yasushi Asano; Wendy Weinstock Brown; Marcia L Keen; Friedrich K Port; Eric W Young
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Experts' attitudes towards medical futility: an empirical survey from Japan.

Authors:  Alireza Bagheri; Atsushi Asai; Ryuichi Ida
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2006-06-10       Impact factor: 2.652

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Cases and culture : the benefits and risks of narrating "life as lived".

Authors:  Michael A Ashby; Leigh E Rich
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Determinants of quality of life among Malaysian cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mehrnoosh Akhtari-Zavare; Sherina Mohd-Sidik; Ummavathy Periasamy; Lekhraj Rampal; Siti Irma Fadhilah; Rozi Mahmud
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.186

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.