Clive Seale1. 1. Centre for Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK. c.seale@qmul.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The prevalence of religious faith among doctors and its relationship with decision-making in end-of-life care is not well documented. The impact of ethnic differences on this is also poorly understood. This study compares ethnicity and religious faith in the medical and general UK populations, and reports on their associations with ethically controversial decisions taken when providing care to dying patients. METHOD: A postal survey of 3733 UK medical practitioners, of whom 2923 reported on the care of their last patient who died. FINDINGS: Specialists in care of the elderly were somewhat more likely to be Hindu or Muslim than other doctors; palliative care specialists were somewhat more likely to be Christian, religious and 'white' than others. Ethnicity was largely unrelated to rates of reporting ethically controversial decisions. Independently of speciality, doctors who described themselves as non-religious were more likely than others to report having given continuous deep sedation until death, having taken decisions they expected or partly intended to end life, and to have discussed these decisions with patients judged to have the capacity to participate in discussions. Speciality was independently related to wide variations in the reporting of decisions taken with some intent to end life, with doctors in 'other hospital' specialities being almost 10 times as likely to report this when compared with palliative medicine specialists, regardless of religious faith. CONCLUSIONS: Greater acknowledgement of the relationship of doctors' values with clinical decision-making is advocated.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The prevalence of religious faith among doctors and its relationship with decision-making in end-of-life care is not well documented. The impact of ethnic differences on this is also poorly understood. This study compares ethnicity and religious faith in the medical and general UK populations, and reports on their associations with ethically controversial decisions taken when providing care to dying patients. METHOD: A postal survey of 3733 UK medical practitioners, of whom 2923 reported on the care of their last patient who died. FINDINGS: Specialists in care of the elderly were somewhat more likely to be Hindu or Muslim than other doctors; palliative care specialists were somewhat more likely to be Christian, religious and 'white' than others. Ethnicity was largely unrelated to rates of reporting ethically controversial decisions. Independently of speciality, doctors who described themselves as non-religious were more likely than others to report having given continuous deep sedation until death, having taken decisions they expected or partly intended to end life, and to have discussed these decisions with patients judged to have the capacity to participate in discussions. Speciality was independently related to wide variations in the reporting of decisions taken with some intent to end life, with doctors in 'other hospital' specialities being almost 10 times as likely to report this when compared with palliative medicine specialists, regardless of religious faith. CONCLUSIONS: Greater acknowledgement of the relationship of doctors' values with clinical decision-making is advocated.
Authors: Ewan C Goligher; E Wesley Ely; Daniel P Sulmasy; Jan Bakker; John Raphael; Angelo E Volandes; Bhavesh M Patel; Kate Payne; Annmarie Hosie; Larry Churchill; Douglas B White; James Downar Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Alexander H Sheppe; Roscoe F Nicholson; Kenneth A Rasinski; John D Yoon; Farr A Curlin Journal: South Med J Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 0.954
Authors: Giancarlo Lucchetti; Parameshwaran Ramakrishnan; Azimatul Karimah; Gabriela R Oliveira; Amit Dias; Anil Rane; A Shukla; S Lakshmi; B K Ansari; R S Ramaswamy; Rajender A Reddy; Antoinette Tribulato; Anil K Agarwal; Jagadish Bhat; Namburu Satyaprasad; Mushtaq Ahmad; Pasupuleti Hanumantha Rao; Pratima Murthy; Kuntaman Kuntaman; Harold G Koenig; Alessandra L G Lucchetti Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2016-02
Authors: Hans-Henrik Bülow; Charles L Sprung; Mario Baras; Sara Carmel; Mia Svantesson; Julie Benbenishty; Paulo A Maia; Albertus Beishuizen; Simon Cohen; Daniel Nalos Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-04-14 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Lois M Ramondetta; Charlotte Sun; Antonella Surbone; Ian Olver; Carla Ripamonti; Tatsuya Konishi; Lea Baider; Judith Johnson Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 3.603