Literature DB >> 23186531

The effect of load on heat production, thermal effects and expenditure of time during implant site preparation - an experimental ex vivo comparison between piezosurgery and conventional drilling.

Florian Stelzle1, Carsten Frenkel, Max Riemann, Christian Knipfer, Philipp Stockmann, Emeka Nkenke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Piezoelectric surgery (PS) is meant to be a gentle osteotomy method. The aim of this study was to compare piezosurgical vs. conventional drilling methods for implant site preparation (ISP) - focusing on load-dependent thermal effect on hard tissue and the expenditure of ISP time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and sixty ISP were performed on ex vivo pig heads using piezosurgery, spiral burs (SB) and trephine burs (TB). The load applied was increased from 0 to 1000 g in 100-g intervals. Temperature within the bone was measured with a thermocouple, and duration was recorded with a stop watch. Thermal effects were histomorphometrically analysed. Twelve ISPs per technique were performed at the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus.
RESULTS: PS yields the highest mean temperatures (48.6 ± 3.4°C) and thermal effects (200.7 ± 44.4 μm), both at 900-1000 g. Duration is reduced with a plus of load and significantly longer in either case for PS (P < 0.05). There is a correlation of the applied load with all other examined factors for PS and TB. Temperature and histological effects decrease for SB beyond 500 g.
CONCLUSIONS: PS yields significantly higher temperatures and thermal tissue alterations on load levels higher than 500 g and is significantly slower for ISP compared to SB and TB. For ISP with PS, a maximum load of 400 g should be maintained.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dental implant; duration; heat production; implant site preparation; piezosurgery; sinus floor; thermal changes; time

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23186531     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  19 in total

1.  Identification of possible factors influencing temperatures elevation during implant site preparation with piezoelectric technique.

Authors:  Luca Lamazza; Domenica Laurito; Marco Lollobrigida; Orlando Brugnoletti; Girolamo Garreffa; Alberto De Biase
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2015-02-09

2.  Evaluation of ultrasonic and conventional surgical techniques for genioplasty combined with two different osteosynthesis plates: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Nassim Ayoub; Ulrike Fritz; Andreas Prescher; Frank Hölzle; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Surgical Drill Bit Design and Thermomechanical Damage in Bone Drilling: A Review.

Authors:  Mohd Faizal Ali Akhbar; Akmal Wani Sulong
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Comparison of heat production and bone architecture changes in the implant site preparation with compressive osteotomes, osseodensification technique, piezoelectric devices, and standard drills: an ex vivo study on porcine ribs.

Authors:  Nishith Bhargava; Vittoria Perrotti; Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio; Victor Haruo Matsubara; Diana Patalwala; Alessandro Quaranta
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.885

5.  Influence of bone density and implant drill diameter on the resulting axial force and temperature development in implant burs and artificial bone: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Mustapha Abouridouane; Nicole Heussen; Ali Modabber; Fritz Klocke; Frank Hölzle
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-11-20

6.  Clinical results of autologous bone augmentation harvested from the mandibular ramus prior to implant placement. An analysis of 104 cases.

Authors:  Andreas Sakkas; Konstantinidis Ioannis; Karsten Winter; Alexander Schramm; Frank Wilde
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2016-10-06

7.  Autogenous bone grafts in oral implantology-is it still a "gold standard"? A consecutive review of 279 patients with 456 clinical procedures.

Authors:  Andreas Sakkas; Frank Wilde; Marcus Heufelder; Karsten Winter; Alexander Schramm
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-06-01

8.  Recommended Drilling Parameters of Tungsten Carbide Round Drills for the Most Optimal Bone Removals in Oral Surgery.

Authors:  József Szalma; Ole Klein; Bálint Viktor Lovász; Edina Lempel; Sára Jeges; Lajos Olasz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Temperature Values Variability in Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Differences between Cortical and Corticocancellous Bovine Bone.

Authors:  Luca Lamazza; Girolamo Garreffa; Domenica Laurito; Marco Lollobrigida; Luigi Palmieri; Alberto De Biase
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation.

Authors:  H Pellicer-Chover; D Peñarrocha-Oltra; A Aloy-Prosper; J-C Sanchis-Gonzalez; M-A Peñarrocha-Diago; M Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.