Literature DB >> 23186117

Improving operating theatre efficiency: an intervention to significantly reduce changeover time.

Bishoy A B Soliman1, Raymond Stanton, Steven Sowter, Warren Matthew Rozen, Shekib Shahbaz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Operating theatre inefficiency and changeover delays are not only a significant source of wasted resources, but also a familiar source of frustration to patients and health-care providers. This study aimed to prove that the surgical registrar through active involvement in patient changeover can significantly improve operating room efficiency and minimize delays.
METHODS: A two-phase prospective cohort study was undertaken, conducted over the course of 4 weeks at a single institution. The only inclusion criteria comprised patients to undertake endoscopic urological day surgery cases and require general anaesthesia. There were no exclusions. In the first phase (observational, with no intervention), changeover times between cases were documented. The second phase followed a structured intervention, involving the surgical registrar being actively involved in the patient's operative journey. Outcome measures were qualitative measures of operative efficiency. Statistical analysis was undertaken.
RESULTS: There were 42 patients included in this study, with 21 patients in each of its arms. A 48% (P-value < 0.01) reduction in overall case changeover times was demonstrated with the utilization of a structured intervention from 27.7 min (95% confidence interval (CI) 22.8-32.7%) to 15.7 min (95% CI 13.2-18.2%). The intervention results were statistically significant (P-value < 0.05) for all markers of efficiency except for the waiting time in the anaesthetic holding bay (P-value 0.13).
CONCLUSION: The surgical registrar can improve operating room efficiency by using a structured intervention, ultimately reducing patient changeover times.
© 2012 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery © 2012 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  changeover time; operating theatre efficiency; productivity; utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23186117     DOI: 10.1111/ans.12013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  5 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of intraoperative process mapping in surgery.

Authors:  Ru Dee Chung; David J Hunter-Smith; Robert T Spychal; Venkat V Ramakrishnan; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12

2.  Retrospective analysis of mepivacaine, prilocaine and chloroprocaine for low-dose spinal anaesthesia in outpatient perianal procedures.

Authors:  Volker Gebhardt; Kevin Kiefer; Dieter Bussen; Christel Weiss; Marc D Schmittner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Clinical management issues vary by specialty in the Victorian Audit of Surgical Mortality: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Jessele Vinluan; Claudia Retegan; Andrew Chen; Charles Barry Beiles
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Reducing Changeover Time Between Surgeries Through Lean Thinking: An Action Research Project.

Authors:  Mirjam Amati; Alan Valnegri; Alessandro Bressan; Davide La Regina; Claudio Tassone; Antonio Lo Piccolo; Francesco Mongelli; Andrea Saporito
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-27

5.  AN AUDIT OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL PROCEDURES UNDER GENERAL ANAESTHESIA AT THE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL IBADAN, NIGERIA.

Authors:  A A Olusanya; T O Aladelusi; B B Osinaike; S Akinloye; J T Arotiba
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.