Literature DB >> 23185667

Prognostic value of body mass index in korean patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Jeong Min Park1, Jung Soo Nam, Woong Na, Jong Jin Oh, Sangchul Lee, Sung Kyu Hong, Seok-Soo Byun, Sang Eun Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated the correlation between body mass index (BMI) and the prognosis of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in patients who received docetaxel treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of 55 patients who were diagnosed with CRPC and received docetaxel treatment between 2003 and 2009 at our institution. Patients with a normal or lower BMI (<23.0 kg/m(2)) were categorized as group I and patients with an overweight or greater BMI (≥23.0 kg/m(2)) were categorized as group II. Clinicopathological features and survival rates were evaluated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: On the basis of BMI, 27 patients (49.1%) belonged to group I and 28 (50.9%) patients belonged to group II. Mean follow-up periods were 30 months and 34.2 months, respectively (p=0.381). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, hemoglobin level, alkaline phosphatase level, distant metastasis, radiation treatments, or performance of radical prostatectomy (p>0.05). In the univariate analysis for predicting survival rates, BMI (p=0.005; hazard ratio [HR], 0.121), logPSA (p=0.044; HR, 2.878), and alkaline phosphatase level (p=0.039; HR, 8.582) were significant factors for prediction. In the multivariate analysis, BMI (p=0.005; HR, 0.55), logPSA (p=0.008; HR, 7.836), Gleason score (p=0.018; HR, 6.434), hemoglobin (p=0.006; HR, 0.096), alkaline phosphatase level (p=0.005; HR, 114.1), and metastasis to the internal organs (p=0.028; HR, 5.195) were significant factors for prediction.
CONCLUSIONS: Better effects on the cancer-specific survival rate were observed in cases with higher BMI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer specific survival; Castration-resistant prostate cancer; Obesity

Year:  2012        PMID: 23185667      PMCID: PMC3502734          DOI: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.11.761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Urol        ISSN: 2005-6737


INTRODUCTION

Obesity is a major health problem throughout the world, including in Korea. According to the Korean Society for the Study of Obesity, about 30% of the Korean population is classified as overweight or obese [1], which has been linked to the development of various malignant diseases, including colorectal cancer and breast cancer [2]. According to data from the Korea Central Cancer Registry in 2008, the onset of prostate cancer has been sharply increasing since 1999. In 2008, a ratio of 26.1 new cases of prostate cancer per 100,000 persons was reported, and by virtue of developments in diagnostic methods such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and transrectal ultrasonography, the onset rate is rapidly increasing [3]. Obesity and prostate cancer are highly prevalent in elderly men. However, the relationship between obesity and prostate cancer remains unclear. A recent epidemiologic study reported that obesity may be protective against the development of early stage prostate cancer [4]. On the contrary, other studies have shown that obesity may be associated with an increased risk of advanced disease and death from prostate cancer [5,6]. Amling et al. [7] reported higher rates of positive surgical resection margins and biochemical recurrence in obese patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy than in normal-weight patients. That report is considered to be a representative example of an association between obesity and localized prostate cancer. As aforementioned, most studies on the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the prognosis of prostate cancer patients have focused on localized prostate cancer. To our knowledge, studies are lacking on the relation between BMI and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Thus, we proposed to analyze the prognostic value of BMI in Korean patients with CRPC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted of 55 patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer and who received hormonal therapy for local or distant metastasis. All patients received docetaxel chemotherapy owing to the development of CRPC between January 2003 and December 2009 at our institution. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. CRPC was defined as cases of an increased PSA level despite a serum testosterone level in the castrate range, a PSA level that increased 3 consecutive times despite interruption of administrating antiandrogen agents for 4 to 8 weeks or despite secondary hormonal treatment owing to advancement of the metastatic lesion, or the new development of a measurable metastatic lesion as assessed by imaging or an increase in size [8]. BMI was calculated by dividing body weight (kg) by the square of height (m), which was measured before docetaxel treatment. According to the World Health Organization Asian-Pacific Obesity Guidelines, patients with a normal or lower BMI (<23 kg/m2) were categorized as group I and patients with an overweight or greater BMI (≥23 kg/m2) were categorized as group II. By use of the medical records of the patients, age, time from the diagnosis of prostate cancer, follow-up period, serum PSA level, Gleason score, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status, serum alkaline phosphatase level, serum creatinine level, metastasis to the internal organs, radiation treatments, and performance of radical prostatectomy were investigated retrospectively. The primary clinicopathological outcomes according to BMI were compared by using Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test. Cancer-specific survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between the groups were tested by using the log-rank test. The effect of BMI on cancer-specific survival was examined by using a Cox proportional hazards regression model, and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. All p-values were two-sided, and values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Analyses were performed by using the PASW ver. 18.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

On the basis of BMI, 27 patients (49.1%) belonged to group I (BMI<23 kg/m2) and 28 patients (50.9%) belonged to group II (BMI≥23 kg/m2). Mean follow-up periods were 30 months and 34.2 months, respectively (p=0.381). When subjects were categorized according to BMI, those with a higher BMI had a higher Gleason score (71.4% vs. 59.3%, p=0.343) and lower PSA (285.7±536.9 vs. 135.5±267.3, p=0.233), but the differences were not significant. In addition, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, ECOG Performance Status, hemoglobin level, alkaline phosphatase level, metastasis to the internal organs, radiation treatments, or performance of radical prostatectomy (p>0.05) (Table 1).
TABLE 1

Baseline clinical and laboratory variables by body mass index

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±SD.

ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; PSA, prostate specific antigen.

Of 55 patients, 16 patients had died at the time of last follow-up of the current analysis, and the median follow-up among surviving patients was 24.7 months (95% CI, 19.9 to 29.4 months). The median survival times were 17.8 months (95% CI, 12.3 to 23.2 months) for men with a normal BMI and 33.2 months (95% CI, 27.9 to 38.6 months) for overweight men. In the normal-weight group, 14 patients died of prostate cancer. In the overweight group, only 2 patients died of prostate cancer, thus showing a higher prostate cancer-specific death rate in the normal BMI group than in the overweight group (p=0.001) (Fig. 1).
FIG. 1

Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrating patients' cancer-specific survival for castration-resistant prostate cancer on the basis of body mass index. BMI, body mass index.

In the univariate analysis for predicting prostate cancer-specific survival rates, BMI (p=0.005; HR, 0.121), logPSA (p=0.044; HR, 2.878), and alkaline phosphatase level (p=0.039; HR, 8.582) were significant factors for prediction. In the multivariate analysis, BMI (p=0.005; HR, 0.55), logPSA (p=0.008; HR, 7.836), Gleason score (p=0.018; HR, 6.434), hemoglobin (p=0.006; HR, 0.096), alkaline phosphatase level (p=0.005; HR, 114.1), and metastasis to the internal organs (p=0.028; HR, 5.195) were significant factors for prediction (Table 2).
TABLE 2

Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors influencing cancer-specificsurvival in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; PSA, prostate specific antigen; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; RRP, retropublicradical prostatectomy; RT, radiation therapy.

DISCUSSION

According to the medical check-up data in 2008 from the National Health Insurance Corporation, 3.24 million persons had a BMI>25 kg/m2, comprising 32.8% of a total of 9.88 million people who received the exam [9]. High BMI is a problem not only of Korea, which is experiencing rapid industrialization, but also of most industrialized countries, including Europe and America. In the United States (US), about 48 to 66 billion US dollars are invested annually in fighting obesity [10]. The severity of obesity is its association with various systemic diseases, such as hypertension, diabetes, circulatory diseases, and eye diseases, as reported in many studies [11-13]. In this study, high BMI was observed to positively affect the patients with CRPC who received docetaxel treatment. In the multivariate analysis, improvement in the cancer-specific survival rate was observed in the group of patients with BMI≥23 kg/m2. In addition, logPSA, Gleason score, hemoglobin level, alkaline phosphatase level, and metastasis to internal organs were reported as significant prognostic factors. The above results contradict those of a previous study that reported an adverse clinical effect of obesity on localized prostate cancer. Magheli et al. [14] reported worse pathological results of obese patients compared with normal-weight patients in a study of 1,877 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Irani et al. [15] reported that obesity not only raised the onset of prostate cancer with an odds ratio of 2.47 but significantly increased the prevalence rate in the resection area in the case of radical prostatectomy. According to Rodriguez et al. [2], obese patients have a high risk of prostate cancer death. Adams et al. [16] reported a linear relationship between BMI increase and the prostate cancer-specific death rate. According to the study conducted by Freedland et al. [17] using Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital data targeting a total of 1,106 patients, obesity raised biochemical recurrence rates after radical prostatectomy. These studies show contradictory results with those of the present study. However, most of the preceding studies targeted patients with localized prostate cancer. According to the study conducted by Halabi et al. [18] of a total of 1,226 patients with CRPC, the overall survival rate and cancer-specific survival rate of overweight and obese patients were higher than those of the normal-weight patients, which agrees with the results of the present study. Moreover, a similar correlation was reported between obesity and biochemical failure in 939 patients treated with external beam radiotherapy [19]. On the basis of this study, we examined the correlation between obesity and the survival rate of patients with CRPC who received docetaxel treatment. Many studies have been reported on the correlation between BMI and prostate cancer in Korean men. Lee et al. [20] reported that a higher BMI was significantly associated with extracapsular extension of tumors. However, most studies have focused on the effects of BMI on the prognosis of localized prostate cancer. To our knowledge, there have been no studies of the relation between BMI and CRPC in Korean men. This is a strength of the current study relative to the other reported studies. In contrast with previously published studies on men with an earlier stage of disease, our results revealed a protective effect of an elevated BMI in patients with CRPC. A hypothesis that thin people are vulnerable to cancer cachexia, thus resulting in a poor prognosis, has been suggested. Cancer cachexia is considered a poor response to rapid progression and treatment of cancer [18]. In the present study, normal-weight patients showed lower hemoglobin levels and ECOG performance status and higher PSA levels than did overweight patients, even though the difference was not significant. In comparison, high-BMI patients are considered to accumulate more protein and calories than thin patients and, accordingly, are more efficient in enduring the cancer-cachetic-producing effect. Some studies have suggested that energy restriction appears to decrease cellular proliferation by ceasing progression through the cell cycle and enhancing apoptosis of cancer cells [21]. In previous studies, various hypotheses have been presented to explain the correlation between prostate cancer and obesity [22-24]. First, obesity, especially abdominal obesity, is associated with insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, which contributes to a high serum insulin level and insulin-like growth factor-I level facilitating the development of cancer. Moreover, obesity-associated high leptin levels adversely affect the survival of prostate cancer patients. Leptin is secreted from adipose cells and promotes angiogenesis. Recently, adiponectin, a major adipose cytokine that decreases in circulation in obesity and ameliorates obesity, was identified as an inhibitor of prostate cancer cell growth [25]. The results of the present study showed that the survival rate was significantly high in the CRPC group having a BMI≥23 kg/m2. As a retrospective study, a limitation of the present study is the sample size of 55, which is small compared with other studies. Despite this limitation, the present study is the first such study in this field in Korea. In the future, prospective and large-scale multi-institutional studies on the pathology of the correlation are expected to be conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from the current study suggest that BMI as well as other prognostic factors are independent prognostic factors in patients with CRPC who receive docetaxel treatment. With higher BMI, the cancer-specific survival rate was observed to improve more, in contrast with the correlation in earlier stages of prostate cancer. In addition, logPSA, Gleason score, hemoglobin level, alkaline phosphatase level, and metastasis to internal organs were significant prognostic factors. A large-scale, prospective study will be needed to elucidate the exact association between BMI and CRPC. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval number: B-1207-164-114.
  25 in total

Review 1.  Update: systemic diseases and the cardiovascular system (i): obesity and the heart.

Authors:  Francisco López-Jiménez; Mery Cortés-Bergoderi
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.753

2.  Influence of obesity on biochemical and clinical failure after external-beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sara S Strom; Ashish M Kamat; Stephen K Gruschkus; Yun Gu; Sijin Wen; Min Rex Cheung; Louis L Pisters; Andrew K Lee; Charles J Rosser; Deborah A Kuban
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Prostate cancer: recent trends in Korea.

Authors:  Byung Hoon Chi; In Ho Chang
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicolas Mottet; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo Van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filiberto Zattoni; Axel Heidenreich
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Overweight, obesity, and mortality in a large prospective cohort of persons 50 to 71 years old.

Authors:  Kenneth F Adams; Arthur Schatzkin; Tamara B Harris; Victor Kipnis; Traci Mouw; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Albert Hollenbeck; Michael F Leitzmann
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Is body mass index associated with pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy in Korean men?

Authors:  Sang Eun Lee; Won Ki Lee; Min Soo Jeong; Murad Abdullajanov; Dae Sung Kim; Hong Zoo Park; Sung Jin Jeong; Cheol Yong Yoon; Seok-Soo Byun; Gheeyoung Choe; Sung Kyu Hong
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Impact of body mass index on biochemical recurrence rates after radical prostatectomy: an analysis utilizing propensity score matching.

Authors:  Ahmed Magheli; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Bruce J Trock; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Alan W Partin; Misop Han; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  [Overweight and obesity in hypertensive Spanish patients. The CORONARIA study].

Authors:  Juan Cosín Aguilar; Amparo Hernándiz Martínez; Xavier Masramón Morell; Rosa Arístegui Urrestarazu; Amparo Aguilar Llopis; José Luis Zamorano Gómez; Beatriz Armada Peláez; Luis Rodríguez Padial
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 1.725

Review 9.  Impact of obesity on cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Kerstyn C Zalesin; Barry A Franklin; Wendy M Miller; Eric D Peterson; Peter A McCullough
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.741

10.  Body mass index and cancer risk in Korean men and women.

Authors:  Sun Ha Jee; Ji Eun Yun; Eun Jung Park; Eo Rin Cho; Il Su Park; Jae Woong Sull; Heechoul Ohrr; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Body mass index and mortality in prostate cancer patients: a dose-response meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Zhong; X Yan; Y Wu; X Zhang; L Chen; J Tang; J Zhao
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 5.554

2.  Comparison of the prognostic values of various nutritional parameters in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from Southern China.

Authors:  Peng Sun; Fei Zhang; Cui Chen; Xin An; Yu-Hong Li; Feng-Hua Wang; Zhi-Hua Zhu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Obese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer may be at a lower risk of all-cause mortality: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.

Authors:  Adriana C Vidal; Lauren E Howard; Amanda de Hoedt; Christopher J Kane; Martha K Terris; William J Aronson; Matthew R Cooperberg; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Prognostic value of serum alkaline phosphatase in the survival of prostate cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dongyang Li; Hang Lv; Xuanyu Hao; Bin Hu; Yongsheng Song
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Combination of body mass index and albumin predicts the survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone: A post hoc analysis of two randomized trials.

Authors:  Jian Pan; Jun Wang; Yu Wei; Tingwei Zhang; Sheng Zhang; Dingwei Ye; Yao Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 6.  Multimodality Imaging for Atrial Fibrosis Detection in the Era of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Valentina Barletta; Lorenzo Mazzocchetti; Matteo Parollo; Davide Spatafora; Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Giulio Zucchelli
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr       Date:  2022-01-24

7.  Prognostic Impacts of Metastatic Site and Pain on Progression to Castrate Resistance and Mortality in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Kyo Chul Koo; Sang Un Park; Ki Hong Kim; Koon Ho Rha; Sung Joon Hong; Seung Choul Yang; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.759

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.