| Literature DB >> 23185440 |
Carl Van Colen1, Francesca Rossi, Francesc Montserrat, Maria G I Andersson, Britta Gribsholt, Peter M J Herman, Steven Degraer, Magda Vincx, Tom Ysebaert, Jack J Middelburg.
Abstract
Hypoxia represents one of the major causes of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning loss for coastal waters. Since eutrophication-induced hypoxic events are becoming increasingly frequent and intense, understanding the response of ecosystems to hypoxia is of primary importance to understand and predict the stability of ecosystem functioning. Such ecological stability may greatly depend on the recovery patterns of communities and the return time of the system properties associated to these patterns. Here, we have examined how the reassembly of a benthic community contributed to the recovery of ecosystem functioning following experimentally-induced hypoxia in a tidal flat. We demonstrate that organism-sediment interactions that depend on organism size and relate to mobility traits and sediment reworking capacities are generally more important than recovering species richness to set the return time of the measured sediment processes and properties. Specifically, increasing macrofauna bioturbation potential during community reassembly significantly contributed to the recovery of sediment processes and properties such as denitrification, bedload sediment transport, primary production and deep pore water ammonium concentration. Such bioturbation potential was due to the replacement of the small-sized organisms that recolonised at early stages by large-sized bioturbating organisms, which had a disproportionately stronger influence on sediment. This study suggests that the complete recovery of organism-sediment interactions is a necessary condition for ecosystem functioning recovery, and that such process requires long periods after disturbance due to the slow growth of juveniles into adult stages involved in these interactions. Consequently, repeated episodes of disturbance at intervals smaller than the time needed for the system to fully recover organism-sediment interactions may greatly impair the resilience of ecosystem functioning.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23185440 PMCID: PMC3504103 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049795
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Results of Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance on ecosystem properties and processes during the experiment.
| Ecosystem property or process | Treatment | Time | Treatment × Time | |||||||||
| d.f. | MS |
| P | d.f. | MS |
| p | d.f. | MS |
| p | |
| Species richness | 1 | 1.029 | 556.60 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.150 | 48.40 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.130 | 41.97 | <0.001 |
| Total abundance | 1 | 7.678 | 156.21 | <0.001 | 14 | 2.382 | 123.31 | <0.001 | 14 | 2.192 | 113.47 | <0.001 |
| Total biomass | 1 | 23.820 | 1502.66 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.323 | 7.21 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.412 | 9.22 | <0.001 |
| Community bioturbation potential | 1 | 10.442 | 4867.18 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.339 | 30.71 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.358 | 32.46 | <0.001 |
| Proportional biomass surficial modifiers | 1 | 2.411 | 250.78 | 0.001 | 14 | 0.257 | 23.13 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.341 | 30.72 | <0.001 |
| Proportional biomass head-down feeders | 1 | 0.652 | 161.61 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.016 | 1.33 | 0.221 | 14 | 0.028 | 2.26 | 0.016 |
| Proportional biomass biodiffusors | 1 | 20.059 | 1047.82 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.094 | 5.28 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.073 | 4.09 | <0.001 |
| Proportional biomass regenerators | 1 | 0.020 | 0.83 | 0.415 | 14 | 0.059 | 4.51 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.043 | 3.32 | 0.001 |
| Proportional abundance surface deposit feeders | 1 | 1.219 | 308.18 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.258 | 20.81 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.129 | 10.41 | <0.001 |
| Proportional abundance subsurface deposit feeders | 1 | 3.584 | 616.97 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.138 | 7.41 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.099 | 5.32 | <0.001 |
| Proportional abundance suspension feeders | 1 | 0.254 | 179.07 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.020 | 11.02 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.004 | 1.95 | 0.040 |
| Proportional abundance omnivores | 1 | 0.066 | 19.39 | 0.012 | 14 | 0.037 | 5.76 | <0.001 | 14 | 0.011 | 1.75 | 0.070 |
| Proportional abundance predators and scavengers | 1 | 0.001 | 0.08 | 0.789 | 14 | 0.016 | 2.08 | 0.027 | 14 | 0.010 | 1.34 | 0.214 |
| Chlorophyll a content | 1 | 0.485 | 19.60 | 0.011 | 13 | 0.172 | 17.77 | <0.001 | 13 | 0.073 | 7.57 | <0.001 |
| % Total organic matter | 1 | 0.002 | 0.26 | 0.637 | 13 | 0.001 | 1.25 | 0.275 | 13 | 0.001 | 1.66 | 0.099 |
| Pore water ammonium 0–1 cm | 1 | 2.867 | 7.93 | 0.048 | 13 | 0.320 | 1.80 | 0.069 | 13 | 0.338 | 1.90 | 0.052 |
| Pore water ammonium 5–10 cm | 1 | 3.015 | 41.73 | 0.003 | 4 | 0.158 | 14.06 | <0.001 | 4 | 0.040 | 3.55 | 0.030 |
| Bed level height | 1 | 0.039 | 22.37 | 0.009 | 11 | 0.002 | 11.27 | <0.001 | 11 | 0.002 | 13.56 | <0.001 |
| Oxygen penetration depth | 1 | 0.014 | 0.15 | 0.722 | 12 | 0.084 | 1.05 | 0.420 | 12 | 0.112 | 1.41 | 0.192 |
| Denitrification | 1 | 0.284 | 50.37 | 0.019 | 2 | 0.019 | 10.51 | 0.026 | 2 | 0.020 | 10.99 | 0.024 |
| Total oxygen consumption | 1 | 0.153 | 3.10 | 0.220 | 2 | 0.057 | 3.88 | 0.116 | 2 | 0.003 | 0.17 | 0.847 |
| Re-oxidation of reduced compounds | 1 | 0.001 | 0.08 | 0.801 | 2 | 0.016 | 1.47 | 0.333 | 2 | 0.002 | 0.20 | 0.830 |
| Organic matter mineralisation | 1 | 0.051 | 1.05 | 0.413 | 2 | 0.098 | 4.35 | 0.172 | 2 | 0.018 | 0.80 | 0.466 |
denotes adapted significance levels deduced from Greenhouse-Geisser corrections when sphericity assumption for repeated measures was not met. Data of bed level height were occasionally lacking for week 0 and week 12 and data of oxygen penetration depth for week 4.
Figure 1Temporal variation in macrofauna community properties in recovering and undisturbed sediments.
Top panel; trophic group composition, abundance and species richness. Bottom panel; sediment reworking trait group composition, biomass and community bioturbation potential. Error bars represent ±95% confidence intervals.
Figure 2Variation in ecosystem processes and properties among recovery stages and in undisturbed sediments.
(a) organic matter mineralization (DIC), (b) total sediment oxygen consumption, (c) denitrification, (d) percentage of total organic matter, (e) oxygen penetration, (f) pore water ammonium concentration in surface sediment, (g) ammonium pore concentration in deep sediments, (h) chlorophyll a concentration, and (i) sediment bed level height. Error bars represent ±95% confidence intervals.
Influence of macrofauna species richness, abundance, biomass, and bioturbation on the variability in ecosystem processes and properties in recovering and undisturbed sediments.
| Ecosystem process | Macrofauna property | SS | F | p | R2 | AIC |
| Denitrification* | Community bioturbation potential | 147.06 | 105.41 | 0.0068 | 0.96344 | 3.57 |
| Total biomass | 146.05 | 88.619 | 0.004 | 0.95681 | 4.56 | |
| Total abundance | 69.353 | 33.306 | 0.0416 | 0.45434 | 19.78 | |
| Species richness | 34.69 | 11.764 | 0.3734 | 0.22726 | 21.87 | |
| Sediment oxygen consumption† | Community bioturbation potential | 4277 | 99.403 | 0.0526 | 0.71306 | 37.954 |
| Total abundance | 2872.7 | 36.766 | 0.0754 | 0.47894 | 41.533 | |
| Total biomass | 2734.7 | 33.519 | 0.1554 | 0.45593 | 41.793 | |
| Species richness | 66.055 | 4.45E+02 | 0.8908 | 1.10E+02 | 45.378 | |
| Organic matter mineralisation‡ | Total abundance | 2990.9 | 1.019 | 0.4394 | 0.20303 | 49.474 |
| Community bioturbation potential | 2851.2 | 0.95998 | 0.3424 | 0.19354 | 49.545 | |
| Total biomass | 1759.1 | 0.54242 | 0.4804 | 0.11941 | 50.073 | |
| Species richness | 1069.8 | 0.31324 | 0.7154 | 7.26E+02 | 50.384 | |
| Primary production** | Total biomass | 12485 | 55.427 | 0.0254 | 0.17572 | 218.08 |
| Community bioturbation potential | 12259 | 54.213 | 0.0262 | 0.17254 | 218.19 | |
| Species richness | 1230.4 | 0.4582 | 0.5252 | 1.73E+02 | 223 | |
| Total abundance | 843.23 | 0.31228 | 0.5804 | 1.19E+02 | 223.16 | |
| Deep bio-irrigation†† | Community bioturbation potential | 7.98E+12 | 28.256 | 0.0004 | 0.77934 | 173.33 |
| Species richness | 5.96E+12 | 11.128 | 0.025 | 0.58178 | 179.73 | |
| Total biomass | 5.91E+12 | 10.939 | 0.0122 | 0.57759 | 179.83 | |
| Total abundance | 9.88E+11 | 0.85438 | 0.3822 | 9.65E+02 | 187.43 | |
| Bed load sediment transport‡‡ | Community bioturbation potential | 16.908 | 96.715 | 0.0062 | 0.30537 | 15.318 |
| Species richness | 14.012 | 74.539 | 0.0094 | 0.25307 | 17.06 | |
| Total biomass | 12.423 | 63.639 | 0.0198 | 0.22437 | 17.965 | |
| Total abundance | 4.59E-03 | 1.82E+01 | 0.9658 | 8.29E-01 | 24.061 |
All distance based models were performed with 4999 random permutations. SS, explained sum of squares of the model; F, pseudo-F statistic; p, significance level; R2, the proportion of variance in the model which is explained by the predictor; AIC, Akaike’s information criterion. The best model for each process according to AIC is shown on top. Total model sum of squares: *152.64, †5998, ‡14732, **71049, ††1.024 109, ‡‡55.369; unexplained sum of squares of the model = SStotal – SSmodel. For details on the process measurements and assessments: see Methods.