Zongqiong Sun1, Shudong Hu1, Jie Li2, Teng Wang3, Zhihui Xie4, Linfang Jin5. 1. Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, The Fourth People's Hospital of Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, 214062, China. 2. Department of Intervention, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, The Fourth People's Hospital of Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, 214062, China. 3. Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, The Fourth People's Hospital of Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, 214062, China. 4. Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, The Fourth People's Hospital of Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, 214062, China. 5. Department of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, The Fourth People's Hospital of Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, 214062, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess metastatic involvement of perigastric lymph nodes (PLNs) in patients with T1 gastric cancer by using CT perfusion imaging (CTPI). METHODS: A total of 82 annotated PLNs of 33 patients with T1 gastric cancer confirmed by endoscopic ultrasonography underwent CTPI and portal phase CT scan before operation. The scan data were post-processed to acquire perfusion maps and calculate perfusion parameters including blood flow (BF) and permeability surface (PS). A radiologist measured the short axis diameters and perfusion parameters of PLNs. According to the post-operative pathology result, PLNs were divided into two groups: metastatic and inflammatory LNs. Perfusion parameters values and the size of PLNs between two groups were respectively compared statistically by t-test, and a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimal diagnostic cut-off value with sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve. RESULTS: Examined 82 PLNs were metastatic in 45 (54.9%) and inflammatory in 37 (45.1%). The mean values of perfusion parameters and the short axis diameters in metastatic and inflammatory PLNs, respectively, were BF of 97.48 vs 81.21 ml/100 mg /min (p < 0.001), PS of 45.11 vs 36.80 ml/100 mg /min (p < 0.001), and the size of 1.51 cm vs 1.29 cm (p = 0.059). The sensitivity of 84.4%, specificity of 67.6% and area under the curve of 0.826 for BF with cut-off value of 88.89 ml/100 mg /min for differentiating metastatic from inflammatory nodes were higher than those of PS or the size of PLNs (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CT perfusion parameters values were different between metastatic and inflammatory PLNs in T1 gastric cancer. BF value may be the most reliable diagnostic marker of metastatic PLNs, and it is helpful for clinicians to choose treatment modality or management plan in T1 gastric cancer patients. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: CTPI gives information on vascularization of LNs.BF value might be a more effective marker than PS or the size of LNs for differentiating metastatic from inflammatory LNs in patients with T1 gastric cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To assess metastatic involvement of perigastric lymph nodes (PLNs) in patients with T1 gastric cancer by using CT perfusion imaging (CTPI). METHODS: A total of 82 annotated PLNs of 33 patients with T1 gastric cancer confirmed by endoscopic ultrasonography underwent CTPI and portal phase CT scan before operation. The scan data were post-processed to acquire perfusion maps and calculate perfusion parameters including blood flow (BF) and permeability surface (PS). A radiologist measured the short axis diameters and perfusion parameters of PLNs. According to the post-operative pathology result, PLNs were divided into two groups: metastatic and inflammatory LNs. Perfusion parameters values and the size of PLNs between two groups were respectively compared statistically by t-test, and a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimal diagnostic cut-off value with sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve. RESULTS: Examined 82 PLNs were metastatic in 45 (54.9%) and inflammatory in 37 (45.1%). The mean values of perfusion parameters and the short axis diameters in metastatic and inflammatory PLNs, respectively, were BF of 97.48 vs 81.21 ml/100 mg /min (p < 0.001), PS of 45.11 vs 36.80 ml/100 mg /min (p < 0.001), and the size of 1.51 cm vs 1.29 cm (p = 0.059). The sensitivity of 84.4%, specificity of 67.6% and area under the curve of 0.826 for BF with cut-off value of 88.89 ml/100 mg /min for differentiating metastatic from inflammatory nodes were higher than those of PS or the size of PLNs (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CT perfusion parameters values were different between metastatic and inflammatory PLNs in T1 gastric cancer. BF value may be the most reliable diagnostic marker of metastatic PLNs, and it is helpful for clinicians to choose treatment modality or management plan in T1 gastric cancer patients. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: CTPI gives information on vascularization of LNs.BF value might be a more effective marker than PS or the size of LNs for differentiating metastatic from inflammatory LNs in patients with T1 gastric cancer.
Authors: Yoon Young Choi; Ji Yeong An; Ali Guner; Dae Ryong Kang; In Cho; In Gyu Kwon; Hyun Beak Shin; Woo Jin Hyung; Sung Hoon Noh Journal: Gastric Cancer Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 7.370