| Literature DB >> 23184199 |
Basar Sarikaya1, Huseyin Demirbilek, Deniz Akata, Nurgun Kandemir.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The role of Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of diffuse thyroid diseases is not well established. In particular, Doppler ultrasonography findings in children with Hashimoto's thyroiditis are very limited. We examined gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings in Hashimoto's thyroiditis in children in an attempt to understand the feasibility of future prospective controlled studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23184199 PMCID: PMC3488981 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2012(11)05
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Grading system created by Sostre and Reyes (4).
| Grade 1 (G1) | Diffusely enlarged gland with a normoechoic (similar to normal tissue) pattern |
| Grade 2 (G2) | Multiple hypoechoic foci or patches scattered throughout an otherwise normoechoic gland; a pattern suggestive of focal rather than diffuse involvement |
| Grade 3 (G3) | Enlarged gland with diffuse but mild hypoechogenicity |
| Grade 4 (G4) | Enlarged gland with diffuse and marked hypoechogenicity |
Color Doppler classification in hypothyroidism, by Schulz et al.
| Pattern 0 | Blood flow limited to the peripheral thyroid arteries, while parenchymal flow is absent |
| Pattern I | Presence of mildly increased parenchymal flow |
| Pattern II | Clearly increased color flow with a diffuse homogenous distribution |
| Pattern III | Markedly increased color flow with a homogenous distribution, including the so-called “thyroid inferno” |
Grading of the gray-scale findings and distribution of patients within the grades. (Note: we have added Grade 0 to the original grading system created by Sostre and Reyes).
| US GRADE | Percentage of Patients |
| Grade 0 | 33.3% (7/21) |
| Grade 1 | 14.3% (3/21) |
| Grade 2 | 33.3% (7/21) |
| Grade 3 | 9.5% (2/21) |
| Grade 4 | 9.5% (2/21) |
Figure 1Gray-scale grading. Grades 1-4 are shown in a-d, respectively. Grade 0, representing a completely normal thyroid gland, is not shown in this figure.
Figure 2Color Doppler patterns. a. Pattern 0 (normal thyroid vascularity); b. color Doppler Pattern I (minimally increased thyroid vascularity); c. color Doppler Pattern II (increased blood flow with a diffuse homogenous distribution); and d. color Doppler Pattern III (“thyroid inferno”).
Distribution of Color Doppler patterns based on the classification initially created by Schulz et al. for hypothyroidism.
| PATTERN | Percentage of Patients |
| Pattern 0 | 33.3% (7/21) |
| Pattern I | 28.6% (6/21) |
| Pattern II | 19% (4/21) |
| Pattern III | 19% (4/21) |
Mean RI values in patients with different Doppler patterns.
| DOPPLER US PATTERN | Mean RI value |
| Pattern 0 | 0.58 |
| Pattern I | 0.56 |
| Pattern II | 0.58 |
| Pattern III | 0.57 |
| All patients | 0.57 |