Literature DB >> 23182960

Comparison of acquired diffusion weighted imaging and computed diffusion weighted imaging for detection of hepatic metastases.

Hironori Shimizu1, Hiroyoshi Isoda, Koji Fujimoto, Seiya Kawahara, Akihiro Furuta, Toshiya Shibata, Kaori Togashi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of acquired diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) (b=1000 s/mm(2)) with that of computed DWI (b=1000 s/mm(2)) for the detection of hepatic metastases.
METHODS: Two hundred and sixty patients underwent abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 T for the evaluation of hepatic metastasis, including T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), heavily T2WI, DWI with b-values of 0, 500, 1000 s/mm(2), and three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA), and 190 patients were included in the final study. Computed DWI (=1000 s/mm(2)) was synthesized from lower b-values (b=0 and 500 s/mm(2)). Two groups were assigned and compared: group A (acquired DWI) and group B (computed DWI). Diagnostic performance using each imaging set was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 76 hepatic metastases were confirmed. The area under the ROC curve (Az) of group A was larger than that of group B (Observer 1; 0.919-0.915, Observer 2; 0.926-0.901), but there were no significant differences (observer 1, P=0.500; observer 2, P=0.190). There were 5 metastases visualized in group A, but these were difficult to detect in group B. However, there were 2 metastases that were better visualized in group B than in group A.
CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between acquired DWI and computed DWI in the detection of hepatic metastasis.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23182960     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  6 in total

1.  Computed diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating synovial proliferation from joint effusion in hand arthritis.

Authors:  Yuki Tanaka; Motoshi Fujimori; Koichi Murakami; Hiroyuki Sugimori; Nozomi Oki; Takatoshi Aoki; Tamotsu Kamishima
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Scan time minimization in hepatic diffusion-weighted imaging: evaluation of the simultaneous multislice acceleration technique with different acceleration factors and gradient preparation schemes.

Authors:  Jana Taron; Petros Martirosian; Nina F Schwenzer; Michael Erb; Thomas Kuestner; Jakob Weiß; Ahmed Othman; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christina Schraml
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  A meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for the detection of liver metastases.

Authors:  Valérie Vilgrain; Maxime Esvan; Maxime Ronot; Aurore Caumont-Prim; Christophe Aubé; Gilles Chatellier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Diffusion-weighted MRI of ischemic stroke at 3T: Value of synthetic b-values.

Authors:  Thomas Sartoretti; Elisabeth Sartoretti; Michael Wyss; Manoj Mannil; Luuk van Smoorenburg; Barbara Eichenberger; Carolin Reischauer; Alex Alfieri; Christoph Binkert; Sabine Sartoretti-Schefer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Improved Visualization of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma with Computed Diffusion-weighted Imaging.

Authors:  Koji Yamashita; Akio Hiwatashi; Osamu Togao; Kazufumi Kikuchi; Yamato Shimomiya; Ryotaro Kamei; Daichi Momosaka; Nozomu Matsumoto; Kouji Kobayashi; Atsushi Takemura; Thomas Christian Kwee; Taro Takahara; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  Feasibility Study of Synthetic Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Patients with Breast Cancer in Comparison with Conventional Diffusion-Weighted MRI.

Authors:  Bo Hwa Choi; Hye Jin Baek; Ji Young Ha; Kyeong Hwa Ryu; Jin Il Moon; Sung Eun Park; Kyungsoo Bae; Kyung Nyeo Jeon; Eun Jung Jung
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.