Literature DB >> 23182700

Evaluation of current consensus statement recommendations for accelerated partial breast irradiation: a pooled analysis of William Beaumont Hospital and American Society of Breast Surgeon MammoSite Registry Trial Data.

J Ben Wilkinson1, Peter D Beitsch, Chirag Shah, Doug Arthur, Bruce G Haffty, David E Wazer, Martin Keisch, Simona F Shaitelman, Maureen Lyden, Peter Y Chen, Frank A Vicini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Consensus Statement (CS) recommendations for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) are associated with significantly different outcomes in a pooled analysis from William Beaumont Hospital (WBH) and the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) MammoSite® Registry Trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: APBI was used to treat 2127 cases of early-stage breast cancer (WBH, n=678; ASBrS, n=1449). Three forms of APBI were used at WBH (interstitial, n=221; balloon-based, n=255; or 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, n=206), whereas all Registry Trial patients received balloon-based brachytherapy. Patients were divided according to the ASTRO CS into suitable (n=661, 36.5%), cautionary (n=850, 46.9%), and unsuitable (n=302, 16.7%) categories. Tumor characteristics and clinical outcomes were analyzed according to CS group.
RESULTS: The median age was 65 years (range, 32-94 years), and the median tumor size was 10.0 mm (range, 0-45 mm). The median follow-up time was 60.6 months. The WBH cohort had more node-positive disease (6.9% vs 2.6%, P<.01) and cautionary patients (49.5% vs 41.8%, P=.06). The 5-year actuarial ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), regional nodal failure (RNF), and distant metastasis (DM) for the whole cohort were 2.8%, 0.6%, 1.6%. The rate of IBTR was not statistically higher between suitable (2.5%), cautionary (3.3%), or unsuitable (4.6%) patients (P=.20). The nonsignificant increase in IBTR for the cautionary and unsuitable categories was due to increased elsewhere failures and new primaries (P=.04), not tumor bed recurrence (P=.93).
CONCLUSIONS: Excellent outcomes after breast-conserving surgery and APBI were seen in our pooled analysis. The current ASTRO CS guidelines did not adequately differentiate patients at an increased risk of IBTR or tumor bed failure in this large patient cohort.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23182700     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current modalities of accelerated partial breast irradiation.

Authors:  John A Cox; Todd A Swanson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Outcomes After Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation in Women With Triple Negative Subtype and Other "High Risk" Variables Categorized as Cautionary in The ASTRO Guidelines.

Authors:  Anabel Goulding; Lina Asmar; Yunfei Wang; Shannon Tole; Lora Barke; Jodi Widner; Charles Leonard
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Day to day treatment variations of accelerated partial breast brachytherapy using a multi-lumen balloon.

Authors:  Hsiang-Chi Kuo; Keyur J Mehta; Linda Hong; Ravindra Yaparpalvi; Leslie L Montgomery; William Bodner; Wolfgang A Tomé; Shalom Kalnicki
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2014-04-03

4.  Partial-breast radiotherapy after breast conservation surgery for patients with early breast cancer (UK IMPORT LOW trial): 5-year results from a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Charlotte E Coles; Clare L Griffin; Anna M Kirby; Jenny Titley; Rajiv K Agrawal; Abdulla Alhasso; Indrani S Bhattacharya; Adrian M Brunt; Laura Ciurlionis; Charlie Chan; Ellen M Donovan; Marie A Emson; Adrian N Harnett; Joanne S Haviland; Penelope Hopwood; Monica L Jefford; Ronald Kaggwa; Elinor J Sawyer; Isabel Syndikus; Yat M Tsang; Duncan A Wheatley; Maggie Wilcox; John R Yarnold; Judith M Bliss
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines.

Authors:  Christine Chin; Sitara Hirji; Maika Onishi; Richard Ha; Bret Taback; David P Horowitz; Eileen P Connolly
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-11-20

6.  Analysis of the electron-stream effect in patients treated with partial breast irradiation using the 1.5 T MR-linear accelerator.

Authors:  C De-Colle; M Nachbar; D Mӧnnich; S Boeke; C Gani; N Weidner; V Heinrich; J Winter; S Tsitsekidis; O Dohm; D Zips; D Thorwarth
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-01-22

Review 7.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation with brachytherapy: patient selection and technique considerations.

Authors:  Daniel M Trifiletti; Kara D Romano; Shayna L Showalter; Kelli A Reardon; Bruce Libby; Timothy N Showalter
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2015-07-29

8.  Should molecular subtype be recommended as one of the selection criteria for accelerated partial breast irradiation? Preliminary results from an Asian cohort.

Authors:  Tabassum Wadasadawala; Monidipa Mondal; Siji Nojin Paul; Vani Parmar; Nita Nair; Tanuja Shet; Sangeeta Desai; Sudeep Gupta; Rajiv Sarin
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-02-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.