Literature DB >> 23182453

Clinical anatomy of the lingual nerve and identification with ultrasonography.

Brion Benninger1, Jessica Kloenne, Jean Lois Horn.   

Abstract

Our objective was to investigate the pathway of the lingual nerve and find out whether it can be identified using ultrasonography (US) intraorally. It is a dominant sensory nerve that branches from the posterior division of the mandibular aspect of the trigeminal nerve, and is one of the two most injured nerves during oral surgery. Its anatomy in the region of the third molar has been associated with lingual nerves of variable morphology. If surgeons can identify its precise location using US, morbidity should decrease. We searched published anatomical and specialty texts, journals, and websites for reference to its site and US. Cadavers (28 nerves) were dissected to analyse its orientation at the superior lingual alveolar crest (or lingual shelf). Volunteers (140 nerves) had US scans to identify the nerve intraorally. Our search of published books and journals found that descriptions of the nerve along the superior lingual alveolar crest were inadequate. We found no US studies of the nerve in humans. Dissections showed that the nerve was above (n=6, 21%) and below (n=22, 79%) the crest of the lingual plate. US scans showed 140 lingual nerves intraorally in 70 volunteers. The nerve lay either above or below the superior lingual alveolar crest, which led us to develop a high/low classification system. US can identify the lingual nerve and help to classify it preoperatively to avoid injury. Our results suggest that clinical anatomy of the lingual nerve includes the superior lingual alveolar crest at the third and second molars because of its surgical importance. US scans can successfully identify the nerve intraorally preoperatively.
Copyright © 2012 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental implants; Intraoral ultrasound; Lingual nerve; Mandibular molar

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23182453     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  5 in total

1.  Quantitative pixel grey measurement of the "high-risk" sign, darkening of third molar roots: a pilot study.

Authors:  J Szalma; Z Bata; E Lempel; S Jeges; L Olasz
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Clinical significance of computed tomography assessment for third molar surgery.

Authors:  Kenji Nakamori; Kei Tomihara; Makoto Noguchi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-28

3.  Variation in Lingual Nerve Course: A Human Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Samah M Al-Amery; Phrabhakaran Nambiar; Murali Naidu; Wei Cheong Ngeow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Lingual Flap Protection during Third Molar Surgery: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Giulia Petroni; Alfredo Passaretti; Fabrizio Zaccheo; Dario Di Nardo; Luca Testarelli; Andrea Cicconetti
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-08-13

5.  Electrical stimulation to clinically identify position of the lingual nerve: results of 50 subjects with reliability and correlation with MRI.

Authors:  Sanaa Aljamani; Callum Youngson; Fadi Jarad; Francis O'Neill
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-07-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.