BACKGROUND: Since May 2001, imatinib mesylate has become the first-line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) but the survival pattern by age, sex, and ethnicity is not clear. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER*Stat) database to compare survival rates in CML among Caucasians, African-Americans (AA), and other races, and also within each race to see survival differences from the pre-imatinib (1973-2000) to post-imatinib eras (2002-2008). We used Z-tests in SEER*Stat to compare relative survival rates categorized by race, gender, and age groups (all ages, < 50, 50+ years). RESULTS: The three-year relative survival rates among Caucasians, AA, and other races in the pre-imatinib era were 44.9 ± 0.6%, 46.8 ± 1.8%, and 48.0 ± 2.2%, respectively, and in the post-imatinib era 64.4 ± 0.8%, 67.3 ± 2.4%, and 69.6 ± 1.6%, respectively. The relative survival increased from the pre-to post-imatinib era for all ethnic groups. In the post-imatinib era, three-year relative survival rates among young AA women were significantly lower (Z-value = -2.54, p = 0.011) than young Caucasian women, 80.5 ± 4.5% (n = 105) vs. 90.3 ± 1.4% (n = 589). CONCLUSIONS: The relative survival rates of CML patients have improved in the post-imatinib era. However, the improvement in survival rates has been modest in this population-based data compared to those reported from randomized trials. Improvement in survival among older patients is lower than in younger patients. Young (<50 years) AA women with CML had lower relative survival rates compared to young Caucasian women in the post-imatinib era.
BACKGROUND: Since May 2001, imatinib mesylate has become the first-line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) but the survival pattern by age, sex, and ethnicity is not clear. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER*Stat) database to compare survival rates in CML among Caucasians, African-Americans (AA), and other races, and also within each race to see survival differences from the pre-imatinib (1973-2000) to post-imatinib eras (2002-2008). We used Z-tests in SEER*Stat to compare relative survival rates categorized by race, gender, and age groups (all ages, < 50, 50+ years). RESULTS: The three-year relative survival rates among Caucasians, AA, and other races in the pre-imatinib era were 44.9 ± 0.6%, 46.8 ± 1.8%, and 48.0 ± 2.2%, respectively, and in the post-imatinib era 64.4 ± 0.8%, 67.3 ± 2.4%, and 69.6 ± 1.6%, respectively. The relative survival increased from the pre-to post-imatinib era for all ethnic groups. In the post-imatinib era, three-year relative survival rates among young AA women were significantly lower (Z-value = -2.54, p = 0.011) than young Caucasian women, 80.5 ± 4.5% (n = 105) vs. 90.3 ± 1.4% (n = 589). CONCLUSIONS: The relative survival rates of CMLpatients have improved in the post-imatinib era. However, the improvement in survival rates has been modest in this population-based data compared to those reported from randomized trials. Improvement in survival among older patients is lower than in younger patients. Young (<50 years) AA women with CML had lower relative survival rates compared to young Caucasian women in the post-imatinib era.