Literature DB >> 16983117

Patients' decision-making process regarding participation in phase I oncology research.

Manish Agrawal1, Christine Grady, Diane L Fairclough, Neal J Meropol, Kim Maynard, Ezekiel J Emanuel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study assesses the decision-making process of patients enrolling in phase I oncology studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants were eligible if they had consented to participate in a phase I cancer study at one of five cancer centers, understood English, and were older than 18 years. Trained interviewers conducted structured in-person interviews.
RESULTS: Of the 163 participants, 88% were white, 96% had health insurance, and 51% were college graduates or post graduates. Overall, 81% were aware of hospice, but only 6% had seriously considered hospice for themselves; 84% were aware of palliative care and 10% seriously considered it for themselves; and 7% considered getting no treatment at all. Overall, 75% reported moderate or a lot of pressure to participate in the phase I study because their cancer was growing, whereas 7% reported such pressure from the study investigators and 9% felt such pressure from their families. For 63% of patients, the most important information for decision making was that the phase I drug killed cancer cells; only 12% reported that the adverse effects of the drug(s) was the most useful information. More than 90% of patients said they would still participate in the study even if the experimental drug caused serious adverse effects, including a 10% chance of dying.
CONCLUSION: Patients are aware of many alternatives to phase I studies, but do not seriously consider them. Very few experience pressure from family or researchers to participate in research. Their main goal is to fight their cancer, and almost no adverse effect, including death, would dissuade them from enrolling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16983117     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.0269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  64 in total

Review 1.  Current challenges for the early clinical development of anticancer drugs in the era of molecularly targeted agents.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; Véronique Diéras; Patricia Tresca; Wulfran Cacheux; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 2.  Prolonged QTc interval in cancer therapeutic drug development: defining arrhythmic risk in malignancy.

Authors:  Joanna M Brell
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 3.  Chemotherapy at end-of-life: an integration of oncology and palliative team.

Authors:  Wing-lok Chan; Ka-on Lam; Wai-kwan Siu; Kwok-keung Yuen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  The quality of informed consent: mapping the landscape. A review of empirical data from developing and developed countries.

Authors:  Amulya Mandava; Christine Pace; Benjamin Campbell; Ezekiel Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Mentoring in the ethics of clinical research: an ongoing need.

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Palliative Care and Phase 1 Trials: Intervention to Improve Quality of Life and Provide Education
.

Authors:  Betty R Ferrell; Vincent Chung; Marianna Koczywas; Anna Cathy Williams; Denise Gallagher; Patricia Fischer; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.027

Review 7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of phase I/II targeted therapy combined with radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: quality of report, toxicity, and survival.

Authors:  Marcos A dos Santos; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Pierre Blanchard; Delphine Lefeuvre; Antonin Levy; Mehdi Touat; Guillaume Louvel; Frédéric Dhermain; Jean-Charles Soria; Eric Deutsch; Gwénaël Le Teuff
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Clinical trial participation as part of end-of-life cancer care: associations with medical care and quality of life near death.

Authors:  Andrea C Enzinger; Baohui Zhang; Jane C Weeks; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Giving voice to study volunteers: comparing views of mentally ill, physically ill, and healthy protocol participants on ethical aspects of clinical research.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Jane Paik Kim
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 4.791

10.  What is a good medical decision? A research agenda guided by perspectives from multiple stakeholders.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Sarah E Lillie; Dana L Alden; Laura Scherer; Megan Oser; Christine Rini; Miho Tanaka; John Baleix; Mikki Brewster; Simon Craddock Lee; Mary K Goldstein; Robert M Jacobson; Ronald E Myers; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Erika A Waters
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-08-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.