Marlyse Frieda Haward1, Ryan O Murphy, John M Lorenz. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Children’s Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York, USA.mhaward@aol.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether presenting delivery room management options as defaults influences decisions to resuscitate extremely premature infants. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Adult volunteers recruited from the world wide web were randomised to receive either resuscitation or comfort care as the delivery room management default option for a hypothetical delivery of a 23-week gestation infant. Participants were required to check a box to opt out of the default. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of respondents electing resuscitation. Data were analysed using χ(2) tests and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Participants who were told the delivery room management default option was resuscitation were more likely to opt for resuscitation (OR 6.54 95% CI 3.85 to 11.11, p<0.001). This effect persisted on multivariate regression analysis (OR 7.00, 95% CI 3.97 to 12.36, p<0.001). Female gender, being married or in a committed relationship, being highly religious, experiences with prematurity, and favouring sanctity of life were significantly associated with decisions to resuscitate. DISCUSSION: Presenting delivery room options for extremely premature infants as defaults exert a significant effect on decision makers. The information structure of the choice task may act as a subtle form of manipulation. Further, this effect may operate in ways that a decision maker is not aware of and this raises questions of patient autonomy. CONCLUSION: Presenting delivery room options for extremely premature infants as defaults may compromise autonomous decision-making.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether presenting delivery room management options as defaults influences decisions to resuscitate extremely premature infants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult volunteers recruited from the world wide web were randomised to receive either resuscitation or comfort care as the delivery room management default option for a hypothetical delivery of a 23-week gestation infant. Participants were required to check a box to opt out of the default. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of respondents electing resuscitation. Data were analysed using χ(2) tests and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS:Participants who were told the delivery room management default option was resuscitation were more likely to opt for resuscitation (OR 6.54 95% CI 3.85 to 11.11, p<0.001). This effect persisted on multivariate regression analysis (OR 7.00, 95% CI 3.97 to 12.36, p<0.001). Female gender, being married or in a committed relationship, being highly religious, experiences with prematurity, and favouring sanctity of life were significantly associated with decisions to resuscitate. DISCUSSION: Presenting delivery room options for extremely premature infants as defaults exert a significant effect on decision makers. The information structure of the choice task may act as a subtle form of manipulation. Further, this effect may operate in ways that a decision maker is not aware of and this raises questions of patient autonomy. CONCLUSION: Presenting delivery room options for extremely premature infants as defaults may compromise autonomous decision-making.
Authors: Nansi S Boghossian; Marco Geraci; Erika M Edwards; Danielle E Y Ehret; George R Saade; Jeffrey D Horbar Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 7.623
Authors: Siobhan McDonnell; Ke Yan; U Olivia Kim; Kathryn E Flynn; Melodee Nugent Liegl; Steven R Leuthner; Jennifer J McIntosh; Mir A Basir Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 6.314
Authors: Rosa Geurtzen; Jos Draaisma; Rosella Hermens; Hubertina Scheepers; Mallory Woiski; Arno van Heijst; Marije Hogeveen Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 3.183