Literature DB >> 23180108

Why receiving feedback collides with self determination.

Olle Th J ten Cate1.   

Abstract

Providing feedback to trainees in clinical settings is considered important for development and acquisition of skill. Despite recommendations how to provide feedback that have appeared in the literature, research shows that its effectiveness is often disappointing. To understand why receiving feedback is more difficult than it appears, this paper views the feedback process through the lens of Self-Determination Theory (SDT). SDT claims that the development and maintenance of intrinsic motivation, associated with effective learning, requires feelings of competence, autonomy and relatedness. These three psychological needs are not likely to be satisfied in most feedback procedures. It explains why feedback is often less effective than one would expect. Suggestions to convey feedback in ways that may preserve the trainee's autonomy are provided.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23180108     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-012-9401-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  10 in total

1.  Feedback Redefined: Principles and Practice.

Authors:  Subha Ramani; Karen D Könings; Shiphra Ginsburg; Cees Pm van der Vleuten
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A digital peer-to-peer learning platform for clinical skills development.

Authors:  Jesse Basnak; Jennifer Ortynski; Meghan Chow; Emeka Nzekwu
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2017-02-24

3.  Motivation for feedback-seeking among pediatric residents: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Duncan Henry; Travis Vesel; Christy Boscardin; Sandrijn van Schaik
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators.

Authors:  Cosima Engerer; Pascal O Berberat; Andreas Dinkel; Bärbel Rudolph; Heribert Sattel; Alexander Wuensch
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Receiving Feedback in Medical Education.

Authors:  Sreeja Natesan; Christine Stehman; Rebecca Shaw; David Story; Sara M Krzyzaniak; Michael Gottlieb
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-09-23

6.  Experiences of simulated patients in providing feedback in communication skills teaching for undergraduate medical students.

Authors:  Riya Elizabeth George; Harvey Wells; Annie Cushing
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.263

Review 7.  Identifying educator behaviours for high quality verbal feedback in health professions education: literature review and expert refinement.

Authors:  Christina E Johnson; Jennifer L Keating; David J Boud; Megan Dalton; Debra Kiegaldie; Margaret Hay; Barry McGrath; Wendy A McKenzie; Kichu Balakrishnan R Nair; Debra Nestel; Claire Palermo; Elizabeth K Molloy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  The influence of students' prior clinical skills and context characteristics on mini-CEX scores in clerkships--a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Anja Rogausch; Christine Beyeler; Stephanie Montagne; Patrick Jucker-Kupper; Christoph Berendonk; Sören Huwendiek; Armin Gemperli; Wolfgang Himmel
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Processing multisource feedback during residency under the guidance of a non-medical coach.

Authors:  Caroline A M Buis; Marina A W Eckenhausen; Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2018-02-23

10.  Finding common ground: meta-synthesis of communication frameworks found in patient communication, supervision and simulation literature.

Authors:  Matthew Jon Links; Leonie Watterson; Peter Martin; Stephanie O'Regan; Elizabeth Molloy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.463

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.