BACKGROUND: Medical ethics is a critical component of the curriculum for clinical trainees. Educational initiatives should adapt content to participants' experience in order to ensure relevance and retain their interest. AIM: To develop and evaluate an experiential educational program for physicians. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Senior internal medicine residents (n = 40). PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: A case-based didactic program was designed in which each resident shared a difficult ethics case from their clinical experience. We created a curriculum around these cases involving formal didactics as well as open-ended discussion and summarized the ethical issues most relevant to the participants. A course survey was administered based upon the validated Students' Evaluation of Educational Quality (SEEQ). PROGRAM EVALUATION: Common issues raised included surrogate decision-making (18 %), refusal of treatment (14 %), capacity/informed consent (10 %), and medical futility (10 %). Mean SEEQ subscale scores for learning value, organization/clarity, group interaction, breadth of coverage, and assignments/readings were 4.5 (maximum possible score 5). Residents unanimously rated the course overall as good/very good, and all agreed or strongly agreed that the course was useful and its structure effective. DISCUSSION: An experiential case-based didactic program in medical ethics engaged adult learners and facilitated a comprehensive and clinically relevant educational initiative.
BACKGROUND: Medical ethics is a critical component of the curriculum for clinical trainees. Educational initiatives should adapt content to participants' experience in order to ensure relevance and retain their interest. AIM: To develop and evaluate an experiential educational program for physicians. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Senior internal medicine residents (n = 40). PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: A case-based didactic program was designed in which each resident shared a difficult ethics case from their clinical experience. We created a curriculum around these cases involving formal didactics as well as open-ended discussion and summarized the ethical issues most relevant to the participants. A course survey was administered based upon the validated Students' Evaluation of Educational Quality (SEEQ). PROGRAM EVALUATION: Common issues raised included surrogate decision-making (18 %), refusal of treatment (14 %), capacity/informed consent (10 %), and medical futility (10 %). Mean SEEQ subscale scores for learning value, organization/clarity, group interaction, breadth of coverage, and assignments/readings were 4.5 (maximum possible score 5). Residents unanimously rated the course overall as good/very good, and all agreed or strongly agreed that the course was useful and its structure effective. DISCUSSION: An experiential case-based didactic program in medical ethics engaged adult learners and facilitated a comprehensive and clinically relevant educational initiative.
Authors: Lauris C Kaldjian; Marcy E Rosenbaum; Laura A Shinkunas; Jerold C Woodhead; Lisa M Antes; Jane A Rowat; Valerie L Forman-Hoffman Journal: J Med Ethics Date: 2011-09-24 Impact factor: 2.903
Authors: Joseph A Carrese; Erin L McDonald; Margaret Moon; Holly A Taylor; Kiran Khaira; Mary Catherine Beach; Mark T Hughes Journal: Med Educ Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly Journal: Sci Eng Ethics Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 3.525
Authors: E Michelle Todd; Logan L Watts; Tyler J Mulhearn; Brett S Torrence; Megan R Turner; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford Journal: Sci Eng Ethics Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 3.525
Authors: Chelsea E Modlin; Matthew DeCamp; Michele Barry; Danica Rockney; Jeremy Sugarman Journal: Ann Glob Health Date: 2022-08-26 Impact factor: 3.640