Literature DB >> 23179797

Reduction mammaplasty for symptomatic macromastia: which factors influence the post-operative outcome?

Julia C Radosa1, Marc P Radosa, Sascha Baum, Russalina Mavrova, Oumar Camara.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the long-term results and patient's satisfaction in reduction mammaplasties for symptomatic mammary hypertrophy.
METHODS: From 2002 to 2008 a total of 92 women underwent bilateral mammaplasty for a symptomatic macromastia at our department. Three different surgical techniques for reduction mammaplasty were used (Bostwick, Stroembeck, Ribeiro). Patients were re-contacted in 2009 and asked to complete a self-assessment survey in order to asses their satisfaction with the post-operative symptom-relief and the overall outcome.
RESULTS: 90.5 % of all patients stated, that they would retrospectively re-opt for a reduction mammaplasty. Preoperative patients' age, BMI and severity of macromasty-related symptoms were found to be factors positively correlated with a high post-interventional satisfaction with the achieved symptom-relief and the overall outcome. No correlation was found between the amount of intra-operatively resected breast tissue and the post-operative patients' assessment. Patients' assessment regarding the achieved post-operative symptom relief was comparable for all three surgical techniques, however the overall outcome rating for both bi-pedicled approaches (Stroembeck and Ribeiro) was higher compared to the mono-pedicled Bostwick technique.
CONCLUSIONS: Reduction mammaplasty for patients with a mammary hypertrophy and somatic symptoms could offer a causal and effective treatment. The predictive factors for a high patients' satisfaction identified in this study could become a valuable tool in the pre-operative patients counceling and their role should be further evaluated prospectively. The use of bi-pedicled surgical techniques seems to favor a high post-operative patients' assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23179797     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2620-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  3 in total

1.  Influence of the Preoperative Decision-Making Process on the Postoperative Outcome after Hysterectomy for Benign Uterine Pathologies.

Authors:  J C Radosa; C G Radosa; C Kastl; R Mavrova; L Gabriel; S Gräber; G Wagenpfeil; S Baum; A Hamza; R Joukhadar; I Juhasz-Böss; A-S Heimes; G Meyberg-Solomayer; E-F Solomayer; M P Radosa
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  The expanded inframammary fold triangle: Improved results in large volume breast reductions.

Authors:  Karan Chopra; Kashyap Komarraju Tadisina; Alexandra Conde-Green; Devinder P Singh
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2014-01

3.  "Topographic Shift": a new digital approach to evaluating topographic changes of the female breast.

Authors:  Luisa Lotter; Vanessa Brébant; Andreas Eigenberger; Robin Hartmann; Karolina Mueller; Magnus Baringer; Lukas Prantl; Daniel Schiltz
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.344

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.