Literature DB >> 20535047

What influences positive return to work expectation? Examining associated factors in a population-based cohort of whiplash-associated disorders.

Dejan Ozegovic1, Linda J Carroll, J David Cassidy.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of population-based traffic cohort.
OBJECTIVE: To determine which factors are associated with both positive and negative expectations for returning to work after vehicle collision resulting in neck pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Positive expectations predict better outcomes for a variety of health conditions, including return to work from soft-tissue injury (including whiplash-associated disorders [WADs]). However, we know little about those with negative expectations who may be at risk for poor WAD outcomes.
METHODS: We assessed expectations for return to work in a population-based cohort of 2335 individuals with traffic-related WAD. We used logistic regression analysis to model factors associated with expecting to return to work (compared with not expecting to return to work or being unsure).
RESULTS: Depressive symptomatology, lower education, lower income, male sex, and greater initial pain (greater percentage of body in pain and greater intensity of neck pain) were associated with lower return-to-work expectation.
CONCLUSION: A number of demographic, socioeconomic, and injury-related factors were associated with expectations for return to work in WAD. Two of the strongest associated factors were depressive symptomatology and postcollision initial neck pain intensity. These results support using a biopsychosocial approach to evaluate expectancies and their influence on important health outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20535047     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d12432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

1.  Return to work perceptions and actual return to work in workers with common mental disorders.

Authors:  Karen Nieuwenhuijsen; Erik Noordik; Frank J H van Dijk; Jac J van der Klink
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-06

2.  The nosological classification of whiplash-associated disorder: a narrative review.

Authors:  Joe H Ghorayeb
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2021-04

3.  Exploring the distribution and determinants of a change in recovery expectations following traumatic injury to Victorian workers.

Authors:  Fiona J Clay; Anna Devlin; Emily Kerr
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-09

4.  Somatic symptoms beyond those generally associated with a whiplash injury are increased in self-reported chronic whiplash. A population-based cross sectional study: the Hordaland Health Study (HUSK).

Authors:  Solbjørg Makalani Myrtveit; Jens Christoffer Skogen; Hanne Gro Wenzel; Arnstein Mykletun
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  Risk Factors for Prolonged Treatment of Whiplash-Associated Disorders.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Oka; Ko Matsudaira; Tomoko Fujii; Hiroshi Okazaki; Yukari Shinkai; Yutaka Tsuji; Sakae Tanaka; Ryuichi Kato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Healthcare consultation and sick leave before and after neck injury: a cohort study with matched population-based references.

Authors:  Anna Jöud; Johanna Stjerna; Eva-Maj Malmström; Hans Westergren; Ingemar F Petersson; Martin Englund
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Biopsychosocial factors associated with non-recovery after a minor transport-related injury: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Stella Samoborec; Rasa Ruseckaite; Lorena Romero; Sue M Evans
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  An Exploration of the Factors Considered When Forming Expectations for Returning to Work following Sickness Absence Due to a Musculoskeletal Condition.

Authors:  Amanda E Young; YoonSun Choi; Elyssa Besen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Return to work following unintentional injury: a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Urs Hepp; Ulrich Schnyder; Sofia Hepp-Beg; Josefina Friedrich-Perez; Niklaus Stulz; Hanspeter Moergeli
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Biopsychosocial factors associated with non-recovery after a minor transport-related injury: A systematic review.

Authors:  Stella Samoborec; Rasa Ruseckaite; Darshini Ayton; Sue Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.