BACKGROUND: Diffusion tensor data can be analyzed using region-of-interest (ROI) analysis and tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS). There is essentially no literature validating or comparing these techniques in the neonate. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to perform a direct comparison of fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD) and radial diffusivity (RD) derived using manual ROI analysis and TBSS modified for use in neonates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was IRB-approved. Thirty-nine infants, 32-49 weeks post-conception age, underwent MRI at 3 T. FA, AD and RD of the callosal genu (CG) and splenium (CS) and posterior limbs of both internal capsules (PLIC) were determined using both techniques. Pearson correlation (r) was used to estimate the concordance of tensor metrics derived from these techniques. RESULTS: The r value for FA in the CG, CS and left and right PLIC was 0.88, 0.75, 0.78 and 0.35, respectively. The r value for axial/radial diffusivity in the CG, CS and left and right PLIC was 0.62/0.72, 0.76/0.64, 0.68/0.9 and 0.3/0.72, respectively. The variable concordance results from problems with spatial correspondence of ROI masks between the native space and the FA skeleton. CONCLUSION: Direct comparison between these methodologies shows tensor metrics varied with location and by degree, suggesting the two techniques do not provide consistently comparable results.
BACKGROUND: Diffusion tensor data can be analyzed using region-of-interest (ROI) analysis and tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS). There is essentially no literature validating or comparing these techniques in the neonate. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to perform a direct comparison of fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD) and radial diffusivity (RD) derived using manual ROI analysis and TBSS modified for use in neonates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was IRB-approved. Thirty-nine infants, 32-49 weeks post-conception age, underwent MRI at 3 T. FA, AD and RD of the callosal genu (CG) and splenium (CS) and posterior limbs of both internal capsules (PLIC) were determined using both techniques. Pearson correlation (r) was used to estimate the concordance of tensor metrics derived from these techniques. RESULTS: The r value for FA in the CG, CS and left and right PLIC was 0.88, 0.75, 0.78 and 0.35, respectively. The r value for axial/radial diffusivity in the CG, CS and left and right PLIC was 0.62/0.72, 0.76/0.64, 0.68/0.9 and 0.3/0.72, respectively. The variable concordance results from problems with spatial correspondence of ROI masks between the native space and the FA skeleton. CONCLUSION: Direct comparison between these methodologies shows tensor metrics varied with location and by degree, suggesting the two techniques do not provide consistently comparable results.
Authors: Kenichi Oishi; Susumu Mori; Pamela K Donohue; Thomas Ernst; Lynn Anderson; Steven Buchthal; Andreia Faria; Hangyi Jiang; Xin Li; Michael I Miller; Peter C M van Zijl; Linda Chang Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Sune N Jespersen; Christopher D Kroenke; Leif Østergaard; Joseph J H Ackerman; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-12-22 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Mustafa Anjari; Serena J Counsell; Latha Srinivasan; Joanna M Allsop; Joseph V Hajnal; Mary A Rutherford; A David Edwards Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Hao Huang; Jiangyang Zhang; Setsu Wakana; Weihong Zhang; Tianbo Ren; Linda J Richards; Paul Yarowsky; Pamela Donohue; Ernest Graham; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-08-14 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Gareth Ball; Serena J Counsell; Mustafa Anjari; Nazakat Merchant; Tomoki Arichi; Valentina Doria; Mary A Rutherford; A David Edwards; Daniel Rueckert; James P Boardman Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Laura Bassi; Daniela Ricci; Anna Volzone; Joanna M Allsop; Latha Srinivasan; Aakash Pai; Carmen Ribes; Luca A Ramenghi; Eugenio Mercuri; Fabio Mosca; A David Edwards; Frances M Cowan; Mary A Rutherford; Serena J Counsell Journal: Brain Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Gareth Ball; James P Boardman; Daniel Rueckert; Paul Aljabar; Tomoki Arichi; Nazakat Merchant; Ioannis S Gousias; A David Edwards; Serena J Counsell Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Diliana Pecheva; Paul Yushkevich; Dafnis Batalle; Emer Hughes; Paul Aljabar; Julia Wurie; Joseph V Hajnal; A David Edwards; Daniel C Alexander; Serena J Counsell; Hui Zhang Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Sarah A Sparrow; Devasuda Anblagan; Amanda J Drake; Emma J Telford; Rozalia Pataky; Chinthika Piyasena; Scott I Semple; Mark E Bastin; James P Boardman Journal: Eur J Paediatr Neurol Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 3.140
Authors: Ai Peng Tan; Zhen Ming Ngoh; Shayne Siok Peng Yeo; Dawn Xin Ping Koh; Peter Gluckman; Yap Seng Chong; Lourdes Mary Daniel; Anne Rifkin-Graboi; Marielle V Fortier; Anqi Qiu; Michael Meaney Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 3.698