Literature DB >> 23178905

TMS stimulus-response asymmetry in left- and right-handed individuals.

Julian Daligadu1, Bernadette Murphy, Jeff Brown, Brendan Rae, Paul Yielder.   

Abstract

There have been inconsistencies in the literature regarding asymmetrical neural control and results of experiments using TMS techniques. Therefore, the aim of this study was to further our understanding of the neural relationships that may underlie performance asymmetry with respect to the distal muscles of the hand using a TMS stimulus-response curve technique. Twenty-four male subjects (12 right handed, 12 left handed) participated in a TMS stimulus-response (S-R) curve trial. Focal TMS was applied over the motor cortex to find the optimal position for the first dorsal interossei muscle and to determine rest threshold (RTh). Seven TMS intensities ranging from 90 to 150 % of RTh were delivered in 10 % increments. One single TMS block consisted of 16 stimuli at each intensity. Peak-to-peak amplitudes were measured and the S-R curve generated. In right-handed subjects, the mean difference in slopes between the right and left hand was -0.011 ± 0.03, while the mean difference between hands in left-handed subjects was -0.049 ± 0.08. Left-handed normalized data in right handers displayed a mean of 1.616 ± 1.019 (two-tailed t test p < 0.05). The left-handed group showed a significant change in the normalized slope as indicated by a mean of 1.693 ± 0.149 (two-tailed t test p < 0.00006). The results found in this study reinforce previous work which suggests that there is an asymmetry in neural drive that exists in both left- and right-handed individuals. However, the results show that the non-dominant motor hemisphere displays a greater amount of excitability than the dominant, which goes against the conventional dogma. This asymmetry indicates that the non-dominant hemisphere may have a higher level of excitation or a lower level of inhibition for both groups of participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23178905     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3320-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  Hemispheric asymmetries of cortico-cortical connections in human hand motor areas.

Authors:  C Civardi; A Cavalli; P Naldi; C Varrasi; R Cantello
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Correlates of human handedness in primary motor cortex: a review and hypothesis.

Authors:  Geoffrey Hammond
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Subtle hemispheric asymmetry of motor cortical inhibitory tone.

Authors:  Tihomir V Ilic; Patrick Jung; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex.

Authors:  E M Wassermann; L M McShane; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-02

5.  Hemispheric differences in use-dependent corticomotor plasticity in young and old adults.

Authors:  John Cirillo; Nigel C Rogasch; John G Semmler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Asymmetry in the human motor cortex and handedness.

Authors:  K Amunts; G Schlaug; A Schleicher; H Steinmetz; A Dabringhaus; P E Roland; K Zilles
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses.

Authors:  R Traversa; P Cicinelli; A Bassi; P M Rossini; G Bernardi
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Structure of the human sensorimotor system. I: Morphology and cytoarchitecture of the central sulcus.

Authors:  L E White; T J Andrews; C Hulette; A Richards; M Groelle; J Paydarfar; D Purves
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation: complementary approaches in the evaluation of cortical motor function.

Authors:  T Krings; B R Buchbinder; W E Butler; K H Chiappa; H J Jiang; G R Cosgrove; B R Rosen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Stimulus/response curves as a method of measuring motor cortical excitability in man.

Authors:  M C Ridding; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-10
View more
  9 in total

1.  Intensity matters: effects of cadence and power output on corticospinal excitability during arm cycling are phase and muscle dependent.

Authors:  E J Lockyer; R J Benson; A P Hynes; L R Alcock; A J Spence; D C Button; K E Power
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Shoulder position and handedness differentially affect excitability and intracortical inhibition of hand muscles.

Authors:  Shashwati Geed; Megan Grainger; Michelle L Harris-Love; Peter S Lum; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Phase- and Workload-Dependent Changes in Corticospinal Excitability to the Biceps and Triceps Brachii during Arm Cycling.

Authors:  Alyssa-Joy Spence; Lynsey R Alcock; Evan J Lockyer; Duane C Button; Kevin E Power
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2016-12-15

4.  Determining the Optimal Number of Stimuli per Cranial Site during Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Mapping.

Authors:  Rocco Cavaleri; Siobhan M Schabrun; Lucy S Chipchase
Journal:  Neurosci J       Date:  2017-02-26

5.  Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation of the Motor Cortex in Children.

Authors:  Asha Hollis; Ephrem Zewdie; Alberto Nettel-Aguirre; Alicia Hilderley; Hsing-Ching Kuo; Helen L Carlson; Adam Kirton
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Tracking cortical excitability dynamics with transcranial magnetic stimulation in focal epilepsy.

Authors:  Robert M Helling; Sharon Shmuely; Prisca R Bauer; Else A Tolner; Gerhard H Visser; Roland D Thijs
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.511

7.  Hemispheric differences in corticospinal excitability and in transcallosal inhibition in relation to degree of handedness.

Authors:  Travis Davidson; François Tremblay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Synergistic effects of noradrenergic modulation with atomoxetine and 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor learning in healthy humans.

Authors:  Matthias Sczesny-Kaiser; Alica Bauknecht; Oliver Höffken; Martin Tegenthoff; Hubert R Dinse; Dirk Jancke; Klaus Funke; Peter Schwenkreis
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case-Control Pilot Study.

Authors:  Ernest V Pedapati; Donald L Gilbert; Craig A Erickson; Paul S Horn; Rebecca C Shaffer; Logan K Wink; Cameron S Laue; Steve W Wu
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.