BACKGROUND: The current study was undertaken to investigate the impact of a stoma on the HRQL with a special focus on age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Eindhoven Cancer Registry, rectal cancer patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2007 in 4 hospitals were identified. All patients underwent TME surgery. Survivors were approached to complete the SF-36 and EORTC QLQ-C38 questionnaires. HRQL scores of the four groups, stratified by stoma status (stoma/no stoma) and age at operation (<70 and ≥ 70), were compared. The SF-36 and the QLQ-CR38 sexuality subscale scores of the survivors were compared with an age- and sex-matched Dutch norm population. RESULTS: Median follow-up of 143 patients was 3.4 years. Elderly had significantly worse physical function (p = 0.0003) compared to younger patients. Elderly (p = 0.005) and patients without a stoma (p = 0.009) had worse sexual functioning compared to younger patients and patients with a stoma. Older males showed more sexual dysfunction (p = 0.01) when compared to younger males. In comparison with the normative population, elderly with a stoma had worse physical function (p < 0.01), but slightly better mental health (p < 0.05). Elderly without a stoma had better emotional role function (p < 0.01), and younger patients had worse sexual functioning and enjoyment (both p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with a stoma have comparable HRQL to older patients without a stoma or the normative population, indicating the feasibility of a permanent stoma for elderly patients with a low situated rectal carcinoma. The negative impact of treatment on sexual functioning as found in the current study calls for further attention to alleviate this problem in sexually active patients.
BACKGROUND: The current study was undertaken to investigate the impact of a stoma on the HRQL with a special focus on age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Eindhoven Cancer Registry, rectal cancerpatients diagnosed between 1998 and 2007 in 4 hospitals were identified. All patients underwent TME surgery. Survivors were approached to complete the SF-36 and EORTC QLQ-C38 questionnaires. HRQL scores of the four groups, stratified by stoma status (stoma/no stoma) and age at operation (<70 and ≥ 70), were compared. The SF-36 and the QLQ-CR38 sexuality subscale scores of the survivors were compared with an age- and sex-matched Dutch norm population. RESULTS: Median follow-up of 143 patients was 3.4 years. Elderly had significantly worse physical function (p = 0.0003) compared to younger patients. Elderly (p = 0.005) and patients without a stoma (p = 0.009) had worse sexual functioning compared to younger patients and patients with a stoma. Older males showed more sexual dysfunction (p = 0.01) when compared to younger males. In comparison with the normative population, elderly with a stoma had worse physical function (p < 0.01), but slightly better mental health (p < 0.05). Elderly without a stoma had better emotional role function (p < 0.01), and younger patients had worse sexual functioning and enjoyment (both p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with a stoma have comparable HRQL to older patients without a stoma or the normative population, indicating the feasibility of a permanent stoma for elderly patients with a low situated rectal carcinoma. The negative impact of treatment on sexual functioning as found in the current study calls for further attention to alleviate this problem in sexually active patients.
Authors: Femke Jansen; Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan; J Annemieke Braakman; Paulina M van Keizerswaard; Birgit I Witte; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Tijmen Koëter; Cynthia S Bonhof; Dounya Schoormans; Ingrid S Martijnse; Barbara S Langenhoff; David D E Zimmerman; Floortje Mols; Daria K Wasowicz Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Carmit K McMullen; Joanna E Bulkley; Andrea Altschuler; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Mark C Hornbrook; Virginia Sun; Robert S Krouse Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: N M Verweij; M E Hamaker; D D E Zimmerman; Y T van Loon; F van den Bos; A Pronk; I H M Borel Rinkes; A H W Schiphorst Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2016-10-08 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Francesco Cavallin; Eleonora Pinto; Luca M Saadeh; Rita Alfieri; Matteo Cagol; Carlo Castoro; Marco Scarpa Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 4.430