Literature DB >> 23177010

Concentrations of cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes in biosolid amended soil, influent, effluent, receiving water, and sediment of wastewater treatment plants in Canada.

De-Gao Wang1, Helena Steer, Tara Tait, Zackery Williams, Grazina Pacepavicius, Teresa Young, Timothy Ng, Shirley Anne Smyth, Laura Kinsman, Mehran Alaee.   

Abstract

A comprehensive surveillance program was conducted to determine the occurrence of three cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes (cVMS) octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4), decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5), and dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane (D6) in environmental compartments impacted by wastewater effluent discharges. Eleven wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), representative of those found in Southern Ontario and Southern Quebec, Canada, were investigated to determine levels of cVMS in their influents and effluents. In addition, receiving water and sediment impacted by WWTP effluents, and biosolid-amended soil from agricultural fields were also analyzed for a preliminary evaluation of the environmental exposure of cVMS in media impacted by wastewater effluent and solids. A newly-developed large volume injection (septumless head adapter and cooled injection system) gas chromatography - mass spectrometry method was used to avoid contamination originating from instrumental analysis. Concentrations of D4, D5, and D6 in influents to the 11 WWTPs were in the range 0.282-6.69μgL(-1), 7.75-135μgL(-1), and 1.53-26.9μgL(-1), respectively. In general, wastewater treatment showed cVMS removal rates of greater than 92%, regardless of treatment type. The D4, D5, and D6 concentration ranges in effluent were <0.009-0.045μgL(-1), <0.027-1.56μgL(-1), and <0.022-0.093μgL(-1), respectively. The concentrations in receiving water influenced by effluent, were lower compared to those in effluent in most cases, with the ranges <0.009-0.023μgL(-1), <0.027-1.48μgL(-1), and <0.022-0.151μgL(-1) for D4, D5, and D6, respectively. Sediment concentrations ranged from <0.003-0.049μgg(-1)dw, 0.011-5.84μgg(-1)dw, and 0.004-0.371μgg(-1)dw for D4, D5, and D6, respectively. The concentrations in biosolid-amended soil, having values of <0.008-0.017μgg(-1)dw, <0.007-0.221μgg(-1)dw, and <0.009-0.711μgg(-1)dw for D4, D5, and D6, respectively, were lower than those in sediment impacted by wastewater effluent in most cases. In comparison with the no-observed-effected concentrations (NOEC) and IC50 (concentration that causes 50% inhibition of the response) values, the potential risks to aquatic, sediment-dwelling, and terrestrial organisms from these reported concentrations are low. Crown
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cyclic siloxanes; Effluent; Influent; Receiving water; Sediment; Soil

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23177010     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.10.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  8 in total

1.  The occurrence and fate of siloxanes in wastewater treatment plant in Harbin, China.

Authors:  Bo Li; Wen-Long Li; Shao-Jing Sun; Hong Qi; Wan-Li Ma; Li-Yan Liu; Zi-Feng Zhang; Ning-Zheng Zhu; Yi-Fan Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Influence of siloxane on the transport of ZnO nanoparticles from different release pathways in saturated sand.

Authors:  Sung Hee Joo; Marc Knecht; Chunming Su; Seokju Seo; Randy Lawrence
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.361

3.  Determination of soil-water sorption coefficients of volatile methylsiloxanes.

Authors:  Gary E Kozerski; Shihe Xu; Julie Miller; Jeremy Durham
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  When Attempting Chain Extension, Even Without Solvent, It Is Not Possible to Avoid Chojnowski Metathesis Giving D3.

Authors:  Mengchen Liao; Yang Chen; Michael A Brook
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Using Design of Experiments to Optimize a Screening Analytical Methodology Based on Solid-Phase Microextraction/Gas Chromatography for the Determination of Volatile Methylsiloxanes in Water.

Authors:  Fábio Bernardo; Providencia González-Hernández; Nuno Ratola; Verónica Pino; Arminda Alves; Vera Homem
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  Application of multimedia models for understanding the environmental behavior of volatile methylsiloxanes: Fate, transport, and bioaccumulation.

Authors:  Michael J Whelan; Jaeshin Kim
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Indoor Air Pollution by Methylsiloxane in Household and Automobile Settings.

Authors:  Fanyong Meng; Hao Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluation of the three-phase equilibrium method for measuring temperature dependence of internally consistent partition coefficients (K(OW), K(OA), and K(AW)) for volatile methylsiloxanes and trimethylsilanol.

Authors:  Shihe Xu; Bruce Kropscott
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.742

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.