Literature DB >> 23176530

Impact of different resistance training protocols on muscular oxidative stress parameters.

Débora L Scheffer1, Luciano A Silva, Camila B Tromm, Guilherme L da Rosa, Paulo C L Silveira, Claudio T de Souza, Alexandra Latini, Ricardo A Pinho.   

Abstract

This study analyzes oxidative stress in skeletal muscle using different resisted training protocols. We hypothesize that different types of training produce different specifics. To test our hypothesis, we defined 3 resistance training protocols and investigated the respective biochemical responses in muscle. Twenty-four male Wistar rats were distributed in 4 groups: untrained (UT), muscular resistance training (RT), hypertrophy training (HT), and strength training (ST). After 12 weeks of training on alternate days, the red portion of the brachioradialis was removed and the following parameters were assessed: lactate and glycogen content, superoxide production, antioxidant enzyme content, and activities (superoxide dismutase, SOD; catalase, CAT; GPx, glutathione peroxidase). Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS), carbonyl, and thiol groups were also measured. Results showed increased superoxide production (UT = 5.348 ± 0.889; RT = 5.117 ± 0,651; HT = 8.412 ± 0.431; ST = 6.354 ± 0.552), SOD (UT = 0.078 ± 0.0163; RT = 0.101 ± 0.013; HT = 0.533 ± 0.109; ST = 0.388 ± 0.058), GPx (UT = 0.290 ± 0.023; RT = 0.348 ± 0.014; HT = 0.529 ± 0.049; ST = 0.384 ± 0.038) activities, and content of GPx (HT = 3.8 times; ST = 3.0 times) compared with the UT group. CAT activity was lower (UT = 3.966 ± 0.670; RT = 3.474 ± 0.583; HT = 2.276 ± 0.302; ST = 2.028 ± 0.471) in HT and ST groups. Oxidative damage was observed in the HT group (TBARS = 0.082 ± 0.009; carbonyl = 0.73 ± 0.053; thiol = 12.78 ± 0.917) compared with the UT group. These findings indicate that HT causes an imbalance in oxidative parameters in favor of pro-oxidants, causing oxidative stress in skeletal muscle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23176530     DOI: 10.1139/h2012-115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  20 in total

1.  Strength training and aerobic exercise alter mitochondrial parameters in brown adipose tissue and equally reduce body adiposity in aged rats.

Authors:  Anand Thirupathi; Bruno Luiz da Silva Pieri; João Annibal Milano Peixoto Queiroz; Matheus Scarpatto Rodrigues; Gustavo de Bem Silveira; Daniela Roxo de Souza; Thais Fernandes Luciano; Paulo Cesar Lock Silveira; Claudio Teodoro De Souza
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 4.158

2.  Strength and Aerobic Exercises Improve Spatial Memory in Aging Rats Through Stimulating Distinct Neuroplasticity Mechanisms.

Authors:  Thais Ceresér Vilela; Alexandre Pastoris Muller; Adriani Paganini Damiani; Tamires Pavei Macan; Sabrina da Silva; Paula Bortoluzzi Canteiro; Alisson de Sena Casagrande; Giulia Dos Santos Pedroso; Renata Tiscoski Nesi; Vanessa Moraes de Andrade; Ricardo Aurino de Pinho
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 5.590

3.  Similar Inflammatory Adaptation in Women following 10 Weeks of Two Equalized Resistance Training with Different Muscle Action Duration.

Authors:  Kelerson Mauro de Castro Pinto; Rodrigo César Ribeiro Diniz; Frank Douglas Tourino; Lucas Túlio de Lacerda; Eduardo Bearzoti; Karine Beatriz Costa; Débora Maria Soares de Souza; Fernando Vitor Lima; Etel Rocha-Vieira; Mauro Heleno Chagas; Andre Talvani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Strength Training Reduces Cardiac and Renal Oxidative Stress in Rats with Renovascular Hypertension.

Authors:  Rodrigo Miguel-Dos-Santos; Jucilene Freitas Dos Santos; Fabricio Nunes Macedo; Anderson Carlos Marçal; Valter J Santana Filho; Rogerio Brandão Wichi; Sandra Lauton-Santos
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Repeated bouts of resistance exercise with short recovery periods activates mTOR signaling, but not protein synthesis, in mouse skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Junya Takegaki; Riki Ogasawara; Yuki Tamura; Ryo Takagi; Yuki Arihara; Arata Tsutaki; Koichi Nakazato; Naokata Ishii
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-11

Review 6.  Exercise-induced oxidative stress: Friend or foe?

Authors:  Scott K Powers; Rafael Deminice; Mustafa Ozdemir; Toshinori Yoshihara; Matthew P Bomkamp; Hayden Hyatt
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 7.179

7.  Resistance Exercise Modulates Oxidative Stress Parameters and TNF-α Content in the Heart of Mice with Diet-Induced Obesity.

Authors:  Pauline Souza Effting; Stella M S Brescianini; Helen R Sorato; Bruna Barros Fernandes; Giulia Dos S Pedroso Fidelis; Paulo Roberto L da Silva; Paulo César L Silveira; Renata T Nesi; Rolando B Ceddia; Ricardo A Pinho
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Thermoregulatory responses in exercising rats: methodological aspects and relevance to human physiology.

Authors:  Samuel Penna Wanner; Thales Nicolau Prímola-Gomes; Washington Pires; Juliana Bohnen Guimarães; Alexandre Sérvulo Ribeiro Hudson; Ana Cançado Kunstetter; Cletiana Gonçalves Fonseca; Lucas Rios Drummond; William Coutinho Damasceno; Francisco Teixeira-Coelho
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2015-12-30

9.  Effects of Glutamine and Alanine Supplementation on Central Fatigue Markers in Rats Submitted to Resistance Training.

Authors:  Audrey Yule Coqueiro; Raquel Raizel; Andrea Bonvini; Thaís Hypólito; Allan da Mata Godois; Jéssica Ramos Rocha Pereira; Amanda Beatriz de Oliveira Garcia; Rafael de Souza Bittencourt Lara; Marcelo Macedo Rogero; Julio Tirapegui
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Insulin Resistance Does Not Impair Mechanical Overload-Stimulated Glucose Uptake, but Does Alter the Metabolic Fate of Glucose in Mouse Muscle.

Authors:  Luke A Weyrauch; Shawna L McMillin; Carol A Witczak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.