Literature DB >> 23175480

Technical note: 9-month repositioning accuracy for functional response assessment in head and neck chemoradiotherapy.

M Partridge1, C Powell, M Koopman, L Humbert Vidan, K Newbold.   

Abstract

The use of thermoplastic immobilisation masks in head and neck radiotherapy is now common practice. The accuracy of these systems has been widely studied, but always within the context and time frame of the radiation delivery-some 6-8 weeks. There is growing current interest in the use of functional imaging to assess the response to treatment, particularly in the head and neck. It is therefore of interest to determine the accuracy with which functional images can be registered to baseline CT over the extended periods of time used for functional response assessment: 3-6 months after radiotherapy. In this study, repeated contrast-enhanced diagnostic quality CT and mid-quality localisation CT from a positron emission tomography/CT scanner were available for five time points over a period of 9 months (before, during and up to 6 months after chemoradiotherapy) for a series of eight patients enrolled in a clinical pilot study. All images were acquired using thermoplastic immobilisation masks. The overall set-up accuracy obtained from this 9-month study of 5.5 ± 3.2 mm (1 standard deviation) and 1.9 ± 1.3° (1 standard deviation) is in agreement with published data acquired over 6-8 weeks. No statistically significant change in set-up error was seen with time. This work indicates that thermoplastic immobilisation masks can be used to accurately align multimodality functional image data for assessment of the response to treatment in head and neck patients over extended follow-up periods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23175480      PMCID: PMC3611716          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/47081873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  14 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of normal lung, liver and parotid gland function for radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mike Partridge; Tokihiro Yamamoto; Cai Grau; Morten Høyer; Ludvig Paul Muren
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.089

2.  Repositioning accuracy of two different mask systems-3D revisited: comparison using true 3D/3D matching with cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Judit Boda-Heggemann; Cornelia Walter; Angelika Rahn; Hansjörg Wertz; Iris Loeb; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  The clinical application of PET/CT: a contemporary review.

Authors:  Z Brady; M L Taylor; M Haynes; M Whitaker; A Mullen; L Clews; M Partridge; R J Hicks; J V Trapp
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.430

Review 4.  Three-dimensional motion analysis of an improved head immobilization system for simulation, CT, MRI, and PET imaging.

Authors:  A F Thornton; R K Ten Haken; A Gerhardsson; M Correll
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Hai-Rim Shin; Freddie Bray; David Forman; Colin Mathers; Donald Maxwell Parkin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  Role and value of diffusion-weighted MRI in the radiotherapeutic management of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Maarten Lambrecht; Piet Dirix; Vincent Vandecaveye; Frederik De Keyzer; Robert Hermans; Sandra Nuyts
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.512

7.  Comparison of repositioning accuracy of two commercially available immobilization systems for treatment of head-and-neck tumors using simulation computed tomography imaging.

Authors:  Ronny L Rotondo; Khalil Sultanem; Isabelle Lavoie; Julie Skelly; Luc Raymond
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Cone-beam CT assessment of interfraction and intrafraction setup error of two head-and-neck cancer thermoplastic masks.

Authors:  Michael Velec; John N Waldron; Brian O'Sullivan; Andrew Bayley; Bernard Cummings; John J Kim; Jolie Ringash; Stephen L Breen; Gina A Lockwood; Laura A Dawson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology.

Authors:  James W Fletcher; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Heloisa P Soares; Barry A Siegel; Val J Lowe; Gary H Lyman; R Edward Coleman; Richard Wahl; John Christopher Paschold; Norbert Avril; Lawrence H Einhorn; W Warren Suh; David Samson; Dominique Delbeke; Mark Gorman; Anthony F Shields
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Comparison of plastic and Orfit masks for patient head fixation during radiotherapy: precision and costs.

Authors:  C Weltens; K Kesteloot; G Vandevelde; W Van den Bogaert
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-09-30       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prospective observer and software-based assessment of magnetic resonance imaging quality in head and neck cancer: Should standard positioning and immobilization be required for radiation therapy applications?

Authors:  Yao Ding; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Jinzhong Yang; Rivka R Colen; Steven J Frank; Jihong Wang; Eslam Y Wassal; Wenjie Wang; Michael E Kantor; Peter A Balter; David I Rosenthal; Stephen Y Lai; John D Hazle; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-17

2.  Individual 3D-printed fixation masks for radiotherapy: first clinical experiences.

Authors:  M Mattke; D Rath; M F Häfner; R Unterhinninghofen; F Sterzing; J Debus; F L Giesel
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.924

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.