Literature DB >> 23172773

Common mechanisms of spatial attention in memory and perception: a tactile dual-task study.

Tobias Katus1, Søren K Andersen, Matthias M Müller.   

Abstract

Orienting attention to locations in mnemonic representations engages processes that functionally and anatomically overlap the neural circuitry guiding prospective shifts of spatial attention. The attention-based rehearsal account predicts that the requirement to withdraw attention from a memorized location impairs memory accuracy. In a dual-task study, we simultaneously presented retro-cues and pre-cues to guide spatial attention in short-term memory (STM) and perception, respectively. The spatial direction of each cue was independent of the other. The locations indicated by the combined cues could be compatible (same hand) or incompatible (opposite hands). Incompatible directional cues decreased lateralized activity in brain potentials evoked by visual cues, indicating interference in the generation of prospective attention shifts. The detection of external stimuli at the prospectively cued location was impaired when the memorized location was part of the perceptually ignored hand. The disruption of attention-based rehearsal by means of incompatible pre-cues reduced memory accuracy and affected encoding of tactile test stimuli at the retrospectively cued hand. These findings highlight the functional significance of spatial attention for spatial STM. The bidirectional interactions between both tasks demonstrate that spatial attention is a shared neural resource of a capacity-limited system that regulates information processing in internal and external stimulus representations.

Keywords:  attention; attention-based rehearsal; electroencephalography; short-term memory; somatosensation

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23172773     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  5 in total

1.  Sustained maintenance of somatotopic information in brain regions recruited by tactile working memory.

Authors:  Tobias Katus; Matthias M Müller; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Lateralized delay period activity marks the focus of spatial attention in working memory: evidence from somatosensory event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Tobias Katus; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Clayton E Curtis; Kartik K Sreenivasan; Daryl Fougnie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  The effects of sequential attention shifts within visual working memory.

Authors:  Qi Li; Jun Saiki
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-04

5.  Absence of Evidence or Evidence of Absence? Commentary: Captured by the pain: Pain steady-state evoked potentials are not modulated by selective spatial attention.

Authors:  Elisabeth Colon; André Mouraux
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.