Barbara A Lutey1, Susan H Conradi2, Jeffrey J Atkinson3, Jie Zheng4, Kenneth B Schechtman4, Robert M Senior3, David S Gierada2. 1. Division of Medical Education, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO. Electronic address: blutey@dom.wustl.edu. 2. Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO. 3. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO. 4. Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Partial volume averaging and tilt relative to the scan plane on transverse images limit the accuracy of airway wall thickness measurements on CT scan, confounding assessment of the relationship between airway remodeling and clinical status in COPD. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of partial volume averaging and tilt corrections on airway wall thickness measurement accuracy and on relationships between airway wall thickening and clinical status in COPD. METHODS: Airway wall thickness measurements in 80 heavy smokers were obtained on transverse images from low-dose CT scan using the open-source program Airway Inspector. Measurements were corrected for partial volume averaging and tilt effects using an attenuation- and geometry-based algorithm and compared with functional status. RESULTS: The algorithm reduced wall thickness measurements of smaller airways to a greater degree than larger airways, increasing the overall range. When restricted to analyses of airways with an inner diameter < 3.0 mm, for a theoretical airway of 2.0 mm inner diameter, the wall thickness decreased from 1.07 ± 0.07 to 0.29 ± 0.10 mm, and the square root of the wall area decreased from 3.34 ± 0.15 to 1.58 ± 0.29 mm, comparable to histologic measurement studies. Corrected measurements had higher correlation with FEV₁, differed more between BMI, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity (BODE) index scores, and explained a greater proportion of FEV1 variability in multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: Correcting for partial volume averaging improves accuracy of airway wall thickness estimation, allowing direct measurement of the small airways to better define their role in COPD.
BACKGROUND: Partial volume averaging and tilt relative to the scan plane on transverse images limit the accuracy of airway wall thickness measurements on CT scan, confounding assessment of the relationship between airway remodeling and clinical status in COPD. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of partial volume averaging and tilt corrections on airway wall thickness measurement accuracy and on relationships between airway wall thickening and clinical status in COPD. METHODS: Airway wall thickness measurements in 80 heavy smokers were obtained on transverse images from low-dose CT scan using the open-source program Airway Inspector. Measurements were corrected for partial volume averaging and tilt effects using an attenuation- and geometry-based algorithm and compared with functional status. RESULTS: The algorithm reduced wall thickness measurements of smaller airways to a greater degree than larger airways, increasing the overall range. When restricted to analyses of airways with an inner diameter < 3.0 mm, for a theoretical airway of 2.0 mm inner diameter, the wall thickness decreased from 1.07 ± 0.07 to 0.29 ± 0.10 mm, and the square root of the wall area decreased from 3.34 ± 0.15 to 1.58 ± 0.29 mm, comparable to histologic measurement studies. Corrected measurements had higher correlation with FEV₁, differed more between BMI, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity (BODE) index scores, and explained a greater proportion of FEV1 variability in multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: Correcting for partial volume averaging improves accuracy of airway wall thickness estimation, allowing direct measurement of the small airways to better define their role in COPD.
Authors: H A Tiddens; W Hofhuis; J M Bogaard; W C Hop; H de Bruin; L N Willems; J C de Jongste Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Patrick Berger; Vincent Perot; Pascal Desbarats; José Manuel Tunon-de-Lara; Roger Marthan; François Laurent Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-04-15 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ajay Sheshadri; Alfonso Rodriguez; Ryan Chen; James Kozlowski; Dana Burgdorf; Tammy Koch; Jaime Tarsi; Rebecca Schutz; Brad Wilson; Kenneth Schechtman; Joseph K Leader; Eric A Hoffman; Mario Castro; Sean B Fain; David S Gierada Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2015 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Jens Petersen; Mathilde M W Wille; Lars Lau Rakêt; Aasa Feragen; Jesper H Pedersen; Mads Nielsen; Asger Dirksen; Marleen de Bruijne Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-06-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: George Z Cheng; Raul San Jose Estepar; Erik Folch; Jorge Onieva; Sidhu Gangadharan; Adnan Majid Journal: Chest Date: 2016-03-12 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Jean-Paul Charbonnier; Esther Pompe; Camille Moore; Stephen Humphries; Bram van Ginneken; Barry Make; Elizabeth Regan; James D Crapo; Eva M van Rikxoort; David A Lynch Journal: Respir Med Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: Ivan Dudurych; Susan Muiser; Niall McVeigh; Huib A M Kerstjens; Maarten van den Berge; Marleen de Bruijne; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 7.034