Literature DB >> 23171262

How core competencies are taught during clinical supervision: participatory action research in family medicine.

Danielle Saucier1, Line Paré, Luc Côté, Lucie Baillargeon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The development of professional competence is the main goal of residency training. Clinical supervision is the most commonly used teaching and learning method for the development of core competencies (CCs). The literature provides little information on how to encourage the learning of CCs through supervision. We undertook an exploratory study to describe if and how CCs were addressed during supervision in a family medicine residency programme.
METHODS: We selected a participatory action research design to engage participants in exploring their precepting practices. Eleven volunteer faculty staff and six residents from a large family medicine residency programme took part in a 9-month process which included three focus group encounters alternating with data gathering during supervision. We used mostly qualitative methods for data collection and analysis, with thematic content analysis, triangulation of sources and of researchers, and member checking.
RESULTS: Participants realised that they addressed all CCs listed as programme outcomes during clinical supervision, albeit implicitly and intuitively, and often unconsciously and superficially. We identified a series of factors that influenced the discussion of CCs: (i) CCs must be both known and valued; (ii) discussion of CCs occurs in a constant adaptation to numerous contextual factors, such as residents' characteristics; (iii) the teaching and learning of CCs is influenced by six challenges in the preceptor-resident interaction, such as residents' active engagement, and (iv) coherence with other curricular elements contributes to learning about CCs. Differences between residents' and preceptors' perspectives are discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first descriptive study focusing on the teaching of CCs during clinical supervision, as experienced in a family medicine residency programme. Content and process issues were equally influential on the discussion of CCs. Our findings led to a representation of factors determining the teaching and learning of CCs in supervision, and suggest directions for research, for faculty development, and for interventions with learners. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23171262     DOI: 10.1111/medu.12017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  6 in total

1.  Adopting a learning stance: An essential tool for competency development.

Authors:  Marie Giroux; Danielle Saucier; Cynthia Cameron; Christian Rheault
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Comparing resident-patient encounters and case presentations in a family medicine clinic.

Authors:  Kelly Skelly; Marcy Rosenbaum; Patrick Barlow; Garrick Priebe
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Athletic Training Student Core Competency Implementation During Patient Encounters.

Authors:  Julie M Cavallario; Bonnie L Van Lunen; Johanna M Hoch; Matthew Hoch; Sarah A Manspeaker; Shana L Pribesh
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Identifying the Presence of Cognitive Apprenticeship in the Layered Learning Practice Model.

Authors:  Nicole R Pinelli; Jacqueline E McLaughlin; Julia Khanova; Stephen F Eckel; Maihan B Vu; Morris Weinberger; Mary T Roth
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Analysis of Supervisors' Feedback to Residents on Communicator, Collaborator, and Professional Roles During Case Discussions.

Authors:  Alexandre Lafleur; Luc Côté; Holly O Witteman
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-04-16

6.  Towards tailored teaching: using participatory action research to enhance the learning experience of Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship students in a South African rural district hospital.

Authors:  Klaus B von Pressentin; Firdouza Waggie; Hoffie Conradie
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.