Literature DB >> 23169881

Intracorneal ring segment in keratoconus: a model to predict visual changes induced by the surgery.

Pablo Peña-García1, Alfredo Vega-Estrada, Rafael I Barraquer, Neus Burguera-Giménez, Jorge L Alio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We detected keratoconus cases with a significant potential for poor outcomes following intracorneal ring segment implantation (ICRS). We attempted to predict the potential of a case in terms of gain or loss of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA).
METHODS: In this retrospective and prospective, consecutive, nonrandomized, multicentric study, 58 keratoconic eyes (aged 1756) were implanted with the keraring using the femtosecond laser technology. The follow-up period was 6 months. keratometric, biomechanical, aberrometric, refractive, and visual variables were measured for two different groups: Group A included eyes that gained 0.2 or more in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA, decimal scale) and group B included eyes that lost more than 0.15. Correlations between clinical parameters and changes in visual acuity were investigated. In addition, a linear regression model was developed using CDVA, apical keratometry (AK), and a new keratometric parameter defined and named by us as K-factor (K(F)).
RESULTS: Significant differences between groups preoperatively were found for CDVA (P = 0.002), AK (P = 0.013), and K(F) (P = 0.025). The following predictive model was obtained using these variables: DeltaCDVA = -0.511 + 0.0007K(F)(p)-0.849CDVA(p)+0.008AK(p).$$ Predictability of the model was 0.797. Sensitivity was 88.1% and specificity 83.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: The mathematical model predicts that this surgery is very effective in patients with preoperative CDVA (decimal scale) in the range of 0.01 to 0.3, predicting a gain of 3, 4, or even 5 lines. Gains are predicted and confirmed for CDVA between 0.3 and 0.5. For preoperative CDVA between 0.5 and 0.75 visual outcomes are doubtful. Higher values of CDVA often are related to a decrease in CDVA. This model may help surgeons to select the best cases for ICRS implantation and exclude the worst in terms of visual outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23169881     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-10639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  4 in total

1.  Long-term results of MyoRing treatment of keratoconus.

Authors:  Albert Daxer; Armin Ettl; Robert Hörantner
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-03-02

Review 2.  Efficacy of Different Procedures of Intra-Corneal Ring Segment Implantation in Keratoconus: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Cédric Benoist d'Azy; Bruno Pereira; Frédéric Chiambaretta; Frédéric Dutheil
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Optical Evaluation of Intracorneal Ring Segment Surgery in Keratoconus.

Authors:  Nicolas Alejandre; Pablo Pérez-Merino; Gonzalo Velarde; Ignacio Jiménez-Alfaro; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.048

Review 4.  Corneal biomechanical properties in different ocular conditions and new measurement techniques.

Authors:  Nery Garcia-Porta; Paulo Fernandes; Antonio Queiros; Jose Salgado-Borges; Manuel Parafita-Mato; Jose Manuel González-Méijome
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.