PURPOSE: To evaluate noninvasive and clinically translatable magnetic resonance (MR) imaging biomarkers of therapeutic response in the TH-MYCN transgenic mouse model of aggressive, MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All experiments were performed in accordance with the local ethical review panel and the UK Home Office Animals Scientific Procedures Act 1986 and with the UK National Cancer Research Institute guidelines for the welfare of animals in cancer research. Multiparametric MR imaging was performed of abdominal tumors found in the TH-MYCN model. T2-weighted MR imaging, quantitation of native relaxation times T1 and T2, the relaxation rate R2*, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging were used to monitor tumor response to cyclophosphamide (25 mg/kg), the vascular disrupting agent ZD6126 (200 mg/kg), or the antiangiogenic agent cediranib (6 mg/kg, daily). Any significant changes in the measured parameters, and in the magnitude of the changes after treatment between treated and control cohorts, were identified by using Student two-tailed paired and unpaired t test, respectively, with a 5% level of significance. RESULTS: Treatment with cyclophosphamide or cediranib induced a 54% or 20% reduction in tumor volume at 48 hours, respectively (P < .005 and P < .005, respectively; P < .005 and P < .005 versus control, respectively). Treatment with ZD6126 induced a 45% reduction in mean tumor volume 24 hours after treatment (P < .005; P < .005 versus control). The antitumor activity of cyclophosphamide, cediranib, and ZD6126 was consistently associated with a decrease in tumor T1 (P < .005, P < .005, and P < .005, respectively; P < .005, P < .005, and P < .005 versus control, respectively) and with a correlation between therapy-induced changes in native T1 and changes in tumor volume (r = 0.56; P < .005). Tumor response to cediranib was also associated with a decrease in the dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging-derived volume transfer constant (P = .07; P < .05 versus control) and enhancing fraction (P < .05; P < .01 versus control), and an increase in R2* (P < .005; P < .05 versus control). CONCLUSION: The T1 relaxation time is a robust noninvasive imaging biomarker of response to therapy in tumors in TH-MYCN mice, which emulate high-risk neuroblastoma in children. T1 measurements can be readily implemented on clinical MR systems and should be investigated in translational clinical trials of new targeted therapies for pediatric neuroblastoma. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12120128/-/DC1. RSNA, 2012
PURPOSE: To evaluate noninvasive and clinically translatable magnetic resonance (MR) imaging biomarkers of therapeutic response in the TH-MYCN transgenic mouse model of aggressive, MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All experiments were performed in accordance with the local ethical review panel and the UK Home Office Animals Scientific Procedures Act 1986 and with the UK National Cancer Research Institute guidelines for the welfare of animals in cancer research. Multiparametric MR imaging was performed of abdominal tumors found in the TH-MYCN model. T2-weighted MR imaging, quantitation of native relaxation times T1 and T2, the relaxation rate R2*, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging were used to monitor tumor response to cyclophosphamide (25 mg/kg), the vascular disrupting agent ZD6126 (200 mg/kg), or the antiangiogenic agent cediranib (6 mg/kg, daily). Any significant changes in the measured parameters, and in the magnitude of the changes after treatment between treated and control cohorts, were identified by using Student two-tailed paired and unpaired t test, respectively, with a 5% level of significance. RESULTS: Treatment with cyclophosphamide or cediranib induced a 54% or 20% reduction in tumor volume at 48 hours, respectively (P < .005 and P < .005, respectively; P < .005 and P < .005 versus control, respectively). Treatment with ZD6126 induced a 45% reduction in mean tumor volume 24 hours after treatment (P < .005; P < .005 versus control). The antitumor activity of cyclophosphamide, cediranib, and ZD6126 was consistently associated with a decrease in tumor T1 (P < .005, P < .005, and P < .005, respectively; P < .005, P < .005, and P < .005 versus control, respectively) and with a correlation between therapy-induced changes in native T1 and changes in tumor volume (r = 0.56; P < .005). Tumor response to cediranib was also associated with a decrease in the dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging-derived volume transfer constant (P = .07; P < .05 versus control) and enhancing fraction (P < .05; P < .01 versus control), and an increase in R2* (P < .005; P < .05 versus control). CONCLUSION: The T1 relaxation time is a robust noninvasive imaging biomarker of response to therapy in tumors in TH-MYCN mice, which emulate high-risk neuroblastoma in children. T1 measurements can be readily implemented on clinical MR systems and should be investigated in translational clinical trials of new targeted therapies for pediatric neuroblastoma. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12120128/-/DC1. RSNA, 2012
Authors: Simon Walker-Samuel; Matthew Orton; Lesley D McPhail; Jessica K R Boult; Gary Box; Suzanne A Eccles; Simon P Robinson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Tracy T Batchelor; A Gregory Sorensen; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Wei-Ting Zhang; Dan G Duda; Kenneth S Cohen; Kevin R Kozak; Daniel P Cahill; Poe-Jou Chen; Mingwang Zhu; Marek Ancukiewicz; Maciej M Mrugala; Scott Plotkin; Jan Drappatz; David N Louis; Percy Ivy; David T Scadden; Thomas Benner; Jay S Loeffler; Patrick Y Wen; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Louis Chesler; Chris Schlieve; David D Goldenberg; Anna Kenney; Grace Kim; Alex McMillan; Katherine K Matthay; David Rowitch; William A Weiss Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jake S Burrell; Simon Walker-Samuel; Lauren C J Baker; Jessica K R Boult; Yann Jamin; Anderson J Ryan; John C Waterton; Jane Halliday; Simon P Robinson Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Elizabeth Fox; Richard Aplenc; Rochelle Bagatell; Meredith K Chuk; Eva Dombi; Wendy Goodspeed; Anne Goodwin; Marie Kromplewski; Nalini Jayaprakash; Marcelo Marotti; Kathryn H Brown; Barbara Wenrich; Peter C Adamson; Brigitte C Widemann; Frank M Balis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Louis Chesler; David D Goldenberg; Rodney Collins; Matt Grimmer; Grace E Kim; Tarik Tihan; Kim Nguyen; Slava Yakovenko; Katherine K Matthay; William A Weiss Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Peter D Davis; Graeme J Dougherty; David C Blakey; Susan M Galbraith; Gillian M Tozer; Angela L Holder; Matthew A Naylor; John Nolan; Michael R L Stratford; David J Chaplin; Sally A Hill Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-12-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: David C Blakey; F Russell Westwood; Mike Walker; Gareth D Hughes; Peter D Davis; Sue E Ashton; Anderson J Ryan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Konstantinos Zormpas-Petridis; Neil P Jerome; Matthew D Blackledge; Fernando Carceller; Evon Poon; Matthew Clarke; Ciara M McErlean; Giuseppe Barone; Alexander Koers; Sucheta J Vaidya; Lynley V Marshall; Andrew D J Pearson; Lucas Moreno; John Anderson; Neil Sebire; Kieran McHugh; Dow-Mu Koh; Yinyin Yuan; Louis Chesler; Simon P Robinson; Yann Jamin Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Yong Chen; Yun Jiang; Shivani Pahwa; Dan Ma; Lan Lu; Michael D Twieg; Katherine L Wright; Nicole Seiberlich; Mark A Griswold; Vikas Gulani Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: M Emmy M Dolman; Evon Poon; Marli E Ebus; Ilona J M den Hartog; Carel J M van Noesel; Yann Jamin; Albert Hallsworth; Simon P Robinson; Kevin Petrie; Rolf W Sparidans; Robbert J Kok; Rogier Versteeg; Huib N Caron; Louis Chesler; Jan J Molenaar Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Murali K Ravoori; Masato Nishimura; Sheela P Singh; Chunhua Lu; Lin Han; Brian P Hobbs; Sunila Pradeep; Hyun J Choi; James A Bankson; Anil K Sood; Vikas Kundra Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Keiko Miyazaki; Neil P Jerome; David J Collins; Matthew R Orton; James A d'Arcy; Toni Wallace; Lucas Moreno; Andrew D J Pearson; Lynley V Marshall; Fernando Carceller; Martin O Leach; Stergios Zacharoulis; Dow-Mu Koh Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-03-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M Beloueche-Babari; Y Jamin; V Arunan; S Walker-Samuel; M Revill; P D Smith; J Halliday; J C Waterton; H Barjat; P Workman; M O Leach; S P Robinson Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-08-13 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Yann Jamin; Laura Glass; Albert Hallsworth; Rani George; Dow-Mu Koh; Andrew D J Pearson; Louis Chesler; Simon P Robinson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Claudia Weidensteiner; Peter R Allegrini; Melanie Sticker-Jantscheff; Vincent Romanet; Stephane Ferretti; Paul M J McSheehy Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 4.430