| Literature DB >> 23169339 |
N G Gavalas1, M Tsiatas, O Tsitsilonis, E Politi, K Ioannou, A C Ziogas, A Rodolakis, G Vlahos, N Thomakos, D Haidopoulos, E Terpos, A Antsaklis, M A Dimopoulos, A Bamias.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor action in tumour angiogenesis is well characterised; nevertheless, it functions as a key element in the promotion of the immune system's evasion by tumours. We sought to investigate the possible direct effect of VEGF on T-cell activation and through which type of VEGF receptor it exerts this effect on cells isolated from ovarian cancer patients' ascites.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23169339 PMCID: PMC3504940 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.468
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1Vascular endothelial growth factor suppresses ascites-derived T-cell proliferation. (A) Time kinetics (0–14 days) of VEGF-induced (0.1–100 ng ml−1) reduction of T-cell proliferation, as assessed via 3H-thymidine incorporation assay. Pooled data from three cancer patients are shown. (B) Dose-dependent (0.1–100 ng ml−1) VEGF-induced inhibition of T-cell expansion. Cell growth was measured at day 14. Pooled data (n=15) are shown. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (P<0.05) compared with control (*), 1 ng ml−1 (**), 5 ng ml−1 (***) and 10 ng ml−1 (****).
Figure 2Activated T cells express VEGFR-2. (A) Flow cytometry results showing a representative experiment of T cells from an ovarian cancer patient’s ascites cultured with anti-CD3 and IL-2 for 7 days. Analysis was performed on gated CD3+ cells. Increased expression of VEGFR-2 is observed. (B) Immunocytochemistry images showing increased surface expression of VEGFR-2 (brown colour) on day 7 compared with day 0 (negative). (C) Western blot of ascites-derived T cells, expressing VEGFR-2 are shown. Cells were cultured with IL-2 and anti-CD3 antibody, with or without adding VEGF (see Materials and Methods). Cells were collected at 0 and 7 days of culture. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 was detected at 7 days. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Densitometry is illustrated above the blot. The illustrated blot is a representative of three experiments performed with similar results. The color reproduction of this figure is available on the British Journal of Cancer online.
Figure 3Anti-VEGFR-2 reverses VEGF-induced suppression of T cells. Neutralising anti-VEGFR-2 mAb (block) was added in lymphocyte cultures (n=5) at a final concentration of 1 μg ml−1 for 14 days in the presence of VEGF (100 ng ml−1). *P=0.043 compared with control.
Figure 4Vascular endothelial growth factor suppresses T-cell cytotoxicity. Lymphocytes from the ascites of five ovarian cancer patients were incubated for 14 days with anti-CD3 and IL-2 in the absence or presence of VEGF 5 ng ml−1 and tested against K562, Daudi and autologous cancer cells targets at various effector to target ratios. Data are presented as mean values±s.d. *P<0.05 for comparison between control and VEGF-exposed cells. Statistical analysis was performed on pooled data from all effector:target ratios.