PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Identification of patients at risk for incident disease or disease progression in osteoarthritis remains challenging, as radiography is an insensitive reflection of molecular changes that presage cartilage and bone abnormalities. Thus there is a widely appreciated need for biochemical and imaging biomarkers. We describe recent developments with such biomarkers to identify osteoarthritis patients who are at risk for disease progression. RECENT FINDINGS: The biochemical markers currently under evaluation include anabolic, catabolic, and inflammatory molecules representing diverse biological pathways. A few promising cartilage and bone degradation and synthesis biomarkers are in various stages of development, awaiting further validation in larger populations. A number of studies have shown elevated expression levels of inflammatory biomarkers, both locally (synovial fluid) and systemically (serum and plasma). These chemical biomarkers are under evaluation in combination with imaging biomarkers to predict early onset and the burden of disease. SUMMARY: Prognostic biomarkers may be used in clinical knee osteoarthritis to identify subgroups in whom the disease progresses at different rates. This could facilitate our understanding of the pathogenesis and allow us to differentiate phenotypes within a heterogeneous knee osteoarthritis population. Ultimately, such findings may help facilitate the development of disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADs).
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Identification of patients at risk for incident disease or disease progression in osteoarthritis remains challenging, as radiography is an insensitive reflection of molecular changes that presage cartilage and bone abnormalities. Thus there is a widely appreciated need for biochemical and imaging biomarkers. We describe recent developments with such biomarkers to identify osteoarthritispatients who are at risk for disease progression. RECENT FINDINGS: The biochemical markers currently under evaluation include anabolic, catabolic, and inflammatory molecules representing diverse biological pathways. A few promising cartilage and bone degradation and synthesis biomarkers are in various stages of development, awaiting further validation in larger populations. A number of studies have shown elevated expression levels of inflammatory biomarkers, both locally (synovial fluid) and systemically (serum and plasma). These chemical biomarkers are under evaluation in combination with imaging biomarkers to predict early onset and the burden of disease. SUMMARY: Prognostic biomarkers may be used in clinical knee osteoarthritis to identify subgroups in whom the disease progresses at different rates. This could facilitate our understanding of the pathogenesis and allow us to differentiate phenotypes within a heterogeneous knee osteoarthritis population. Ultimately, such findings may help facilitate the development of disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADs).
Authors: Ali Guermazi; Frank W Roemer; Daichi Hayashi; Michel D Crema; Jingbo Niu; Yuqing Zhang; Monica D Marra; Avinash Katur; John A Lynch; George Y El-Khoury; Kristin Baker; Laura B Hughes; Michael C Nevitt; David T Felson Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2010-12-27 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Patrick Garnero; Bernard Mazières; Alice Guéguen; Michel Abbal; Laurent Berdah; Michel Lequesne; Minh Nguyen; Jean-Pierre Salles; Eric Vignon; Maxime Dougados Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: J C Erhart-Hledik; J Favre; J L Asay; R L Smith; N J Giori; A Mündermann; T P Andriacchi Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Dong Hyun Sohn; Jeremy Sokolove; Orr Sharpe; Jennifer C Erhart; Piyanka E Chandra; Lauren J Lahey; Tamsin M Lindstrom; Inyong Hwang; Katherine A Boyer; Thomas P Andriacchi; William H Robinson Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2012-01-08 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: A Nair; J Gan; C Bush-Joseph; N Verma; M W Tetreault; K Saha; A Margulis; L Fogg; C R Scanzello Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Svetlana Krasnokutsky; Charles Oshinsky; Mukundan Attur; Sisi Ma; Hua Zhou; Fangfei Zheng; Meng Chen; Jyoti Patel; Jonathan Samuels; Virginia C Pike; Ravinder Regatte; Jenny Bencardino; Leon Rybak; Steven Abramson; Michael H Pillinger Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Jaro Karppinen; Katri Koivisto; Jukka Ketola; Marianne Haapea; Markus Paananen; Karl-Heinz Herzig; Mauro Alini; Jeffrey Lotz; Stefan Dudli; Dino Samartzis; Juha Risteli; Marja-Leena Majuri; Harri Alenius; Eero Kyllönen; Jyri Järvinen; Jaakko Niinimäki; Sibylle Grad Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2021-01-09 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: G B Joseph; M C Nevitt; C E McCulloch; J Neumann; J A Lynch; U Heilmeier; N E Lane; T M Link Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 6.576