Literature DB >> 23168378

Quantitative and qualitative comparison of a new prosthetic suspension system with two existing suspension systems for lower limb amputees.

Arezoo Eshraghi1, Noor Azuan Abu Osman, Mohammad Taghi Karimi, Hossien Gholizadeh, Sadeeq Ali, Wan Abu Bakar Wan Abas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to compare the effects of a newly designed magnetic suspension system with that of two existing suspension methods on pistoning inside the prosthetic socket and to compare satisfaction and perceived problems among transtibial amputees.
DESIGN: In this prospective study, three lower limb prostheses with three different suspension systems were fabricated for ten transtibial amputees. The participants used each of the three prostheses for 1 mo in random order. Pistoning inside the prosthetic socket was measured by motion analysis system. The Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire was used to evaluate satisfaction and perceived problems with each suspension system.
RESULTS: The lowest pistoning motion was found with the suction system compared with the other two suspension systems (P < 0.05). The new suspension system showed peak pistoning values similar to that of the pin lock system (P = 0.086). The results of the questionnaire survey revealed significantly higher satisfaction rates with the new system than with the other two systems in donning and doffing, walking, uneven walking, stair negotiation, and overall satisfaction (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The new suspension system has the potential to be used as an alternative to the available suspension systems. The pistoning motion was comparable to that of the other two systems. The new system showed compatible prosthetic suspension with the other two systems (suction and pin lock). The satisfaction with donning and doffing was high with the magnetic system. Moreover, the subjects reported fewer problems with the new system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23168378     DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318269d82a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  7 in total

1.  Self-reported socket comfort, mobility, and balance-confidence of individuals with transtibial amputation using pinlock vs suction suspension.

Authors:  Mayank Seth; Emma Haldane Beisheim; Maximilian Tobias Spencer; John Robert Horne; Frank Bernard Sarlo; Jaclyn Megan Sions
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.672

2.  Development and evaluation of new coupling system for lower limb prostheses with acoustic alarm system.

Authors:  Arezoo Eshraghi; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Hossein Gholizadeh; Jalil Ahmadian; Bizhan Rahmati; Wan Abu Bakar Wan Abas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics.

Authors:  Hossein Gholizadeh; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Arezoo Eshraghi; Sadeeq Ali; Nooranida Arifin; Wan Abu Bakar Wan Abas
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  Gait biomechanics of individuals with transtibial amputation: effect of suspension system.

Authors:  Arezoo Eshraghi; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Mohammad Karimi; Hossein Gholizadeh; Ehsan Soodmand; Wan Abu Bakar Wan Abas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Using mechanical testing to assess texturing of prosthetic sockets to improve suspension in the transverse plane and reduce rotation.

Authors:  Julia Quinlan; Vasanth Subramanian; Jessica Yohay; Brad Poziembo; Stefania Fatone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Techniques for Interface Stress Measurements within Prosthetic Sockets of Transtibial Amputees: A Review of the Past 50 Years of Research.

Authors:  Ebrahim A Al-Fakih; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Faisal Rafiq Mahmad Adikan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Prosthesis satisfaction in lower limb amputees: A systematic review of associated factors and questionnaires.

Authors:  Erwin C Baars; Ernst Schrier; Pieter U Dijkstra; Jan H B Geertzen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.