Literature DB >> 23168136

Single-stage posterior decompression and stabilization for metastasis of the thoracic spine: prognostic factors for functional outcome and patients' survival.

Sangjoon Chong1, Sang-Hoon Shin, Heon Yoo, Seung Hoon Lee, Ki-Jeong Kim, Tae-Ahn Jahng, Ho-Shin Gwak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There are limited data analyzing radiological and clinical factors for the functional outcomes of surgery for spinal metastasis. Also, there are few studies to investigate the relationship between the functional outcome and the patients' survival. Thus, analysis of both functional outcomes and the survival with their relationship in a possibly homogenous group of patients is worth being reported.
PURPOSE: To assess treatment outcomes of single-stage posterior decompression and stabilization (PDS) with or without corpectomy for thoracic vertebral metastases and to analyze factors affecting both the functional outcome and the patients' survival after the surgical intervention. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A consecutive series of 105 patients, who underwent the previously stated surgery for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) of thoracic spine, were included and retrospectively analyzed. OUTCOME MEASURES: The postoperative functional outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scale and Frankel grade at postoperative 2 weeks, and all patients were followed for survival analysis.
METHODS: An institutional database was searched to identify all patients who underwent single-stage PDS for thoracic metastatic spinal tumors between March 2002 and June 2010. Demographic data as well as preoperative and postoperative medical conditions were collected from medical records. Radiological findings were confirmed on electronic archive. Survival data were obtained either on medical records or with a reference to governmental cancer registry system.
RESULTS: Postoperative pain improvement was more evident in patients receiving anterior column reconstruction and four or more levels of fixation (p=.02 and <0.01, respectively). Twenty-one patients (20%) showed improvement of the Frankel grade, and 10 of 21 Frankel C patients became ambulatory. The preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (≥70) and ambulatory status were significant predictors for the postoperative ambulatory function. After surgery, the median overall survival of the patients was 6.0 months. In the univariate analysis, the patient's age (younger than 60 years), type of primary cancer (ie, moderate and slow growth), no visceral metastases, less than three levels of spinal metastases, and postoperative adjuvant therapy were positively significant for the patients' survival (p<.05). In the multivariate analysis, limited (less than three levels) spinal metastases and postoperative adjuvant therapy were proven to significantly prolong the patient's survival (hazard ratios of 0.53 and 0.48, respectively, p<.05). Although the functional outcomes did not directly influence the patients' survival, the patients with better functional outcome showed increased chance of receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy (p<.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Single-stage PDS with or without corpectomy effectively improved the functional status of patients with MSCC of the thoracic spine and also afforded the patients to have more chances of postoperative adjuvant therapy, which was significant for patients' survival. Therefore, we suggest that the role of surgery in the management of MSCC could be not only a symptomatic palliation but also a strategy to prolong patients' survival.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23168136     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  18 in total

1.  Risk factors for major complications in surgery for hypervascular spinal tumors: an analysis of 120 cases with adjuvant preoperative embolization.

Authors:  Benqiang Tang; Tao Ji; Xiaodong Tang; Long Jin; Sen Dong; Wei Guo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Predictive factors of neurological recovery after chronic craniovertebral brainstem compression.

Authors:  Aymeric Amelot; Louis-Marie Terrier; Guillaume Lot
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Monitoring rate and predictability of intraoperative monitoring in patients with intradural extramedullary and epidural metastatic spinal tumors.

Authors:  H Kang; H S Gwak; S H Shin; M K Woo; I H Jeong; H Yoo; J W Kwon; S H Lee
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Outcomes of surgical treatments of spinal metastases: a prospective study.

Authors:  C Bouthors; S Prost; C Court; B Blondel; Y P Charles; S Fuentes; H P Mousselard; C Mazel; C H Flouzat-Lachaniette; P Bonnevialle; F Saihlan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  The outcome and survival of palliative surgery in thoraco-lumbar spinal metastases: contemporary retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  R M Nemelc; A Stadhouder; B J van Royen; T U Jiya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Scoring system for prediction of metastatic spine tumor prognosis.

Authors:  Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Hiroshi Uei; Masashi Oshima; Yasumitsu Ajiro
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

7.  Functional and survival outcomes in patients undergoing surgical treatment for metastatic disease of the spine.

Authors:  Vignesh K Alamanda; Myra M Robinson; Jeffrey S Kneisl; Joshua C Patt
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

Review 8.  Minimal access versus open spinal surgery in treating painful spine metastasis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zuozhang Yang; Yihao Yang; Ya Zhang; Zhaoxin Zhang; Yanjin Chen; Yan Shen; Lei Han; Da Xu; Hongpu Sun
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Patterns of Treatment for Metastatic Pathological Fractures of the Spine: The Efficacy of Each Treatment Modality.

Authors:  Jae Hwan Cho; Jung-Ki Ha; Chang Ju Hwang; Dong-Ho Lee; Choon Sung Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-11-13

10.  Who are the Best Candidates for Decompressive Surgery and Spine Stabilization in Patients With Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression?: A New Scoring System.

Authors:  Mingxing Lei; Jianjie Li; Yaosheng Liu; Weigang Jiang; Shubin Liu; Shiguo Zhou
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.