Literature DB >> 23167832

Benefit of multiple sessions of perilesional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for an effective rehabilitation of visuospatial function.

Linda Afifi1, R Jarrett Rushmore, Antoni Valero-Cabré.   

Abstract

Noninvasive neurostimulation techniques have been used alone or in conjunction with rehabilitation therapy to treat the neurological sequelae of brain damage with rather variable therapeutic outcomes. One potential factor limiting a consistent success for such techniques may be the limited number of sessions carried out in patients, despite reports that their accrual may play a key role in alleviating neurological deficits long-term. In this study, we tested the effects of seventy consecutive sessions of perilesional high-frequency (10 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of chronic neglect deficits in a well-established feline model of visuospatial neglect. Under identical rTMS parameters and visuospatial testing regimes, half of the subjects improved in visuospatial orienting performance. The other half experienced either none or extremely moderate ameliorations in the neglected hemispace and displayed transient patterns of maladaptive visuospatial behavior. Detailed analyses suggest that lesion location and extent did not account for the behavioral differences observed between these two groups of animals. We conclude that multi-session perilesional rTMS regimes have the potential to induce functional ameliorations following focal chronic brain injury, and that behavioral performance prior to the onset of the rTMS treatment is the factor that best predicts positive outcomes for noninvasive neurostimulation treatments in visuospatial neglect.
© 2012 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23167832      PMCID: PMC3563873          DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  65 in total

Review 1.  Experience-dependent plasticity in adult visual cortex.

Authors:  Uma R Karmarkar; Yang Dan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Effects of repetitive TMS on visually evoked potentials and EEG in the anaesthetized cat: dependence on stimulus frequency and train duration.

Authors:  Selcen Aydin-Abidin; Vera Moliadze; Ulf T Eysel; Klaus Funke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Relocation of specific visual functions following damage of mature posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Stephen G Lomber; S Keun Yi; Erin M Woller
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 4.  Mechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damage.

Authors:  Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  S Hesse; C Werner; E M Schonhardt; A Bardeleben; W Jenrich; S G B Kirker
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Functional circuitry underlying visual neglect.

Authors:  R Jarrett Rushmore; Antoni Valero-Cabre; Stephen G Lomber; Claus C Hilgetag; Bertram R Payne
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Yun-Hee Kim; Sung H You; Myoung-Hwan Ko; Ji-Won Park; Kwang Ho Lee; Sung Ho Jang; Woo-Kyoung Yoo; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Exploring Theta Burst Stimulation as an intervention to improve motor recovery in chronic stroke.

Authors:  P Talelli; R J Greenwood; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Neural adaptation reveals state-dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Juha Silvanto; Neil G Muggleton; Alan Cowey; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Opposite impact on 14C-2-deoxyglucose brain metabolism following patterns of high and low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Antoni Valero-Cabré; Bertram R Payne; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 2.064

View more
  5 in total

1.  Multiple sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation to the intact hemisphere improves visual function after unilateral ablation of visual cortex.

Authors:  R J Rushmore; C DeSimone; A Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves abnormal visual cortical circuit topography and upregulates BDNF in mice.

Authors:  Kalina Makowiecki; Alan R Harvey; Rachel M Sherrard; Jennifer Rodger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Educating the blind brain: a panorama of neural bases of vision and of training programs in organic neurovisual deficits.

Authors:  Olivier A Coubard; Marika Urbanski; Clémence Bourlon; Marie Gaumet
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-05

4.  Visuospatial Neglect - a Theory-Informed Overview of Current and Emerging Strategies and a Systematic Review on the Therapeutic Use of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Paul Theo Zebhauser; Marine Vernet; Evelyn Unterburger; Anna-Katharine Brem
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Long term delivery of pulsed magnetic fields does not alter visual discrimination learning or dendritic spine density in the mouse CA1 pyramidal or dentate gyrus neurons.

Authors:  Matthew Sykes; Kalina Makowiecki; Jennifer Rodger
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-09-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.