Literature DB >> 23167382

Clinicopathological features in bilateral breast cancer.

Meltem Baykara1, Selcuk Cemil Ozturk, Suleyman Buyukberber, Kaan Helvaci, Nuriye Ozdemir, Necati Alkis, Veli Berk, Dogan Koca, Ugur Coskun, Berna Oksuzoglu, Dogan Uncu, Erkan Arpaci, Basak Oven Ustaalioglu, Umut Demirci, Mehmet Kucukoner, Gamze Gokoz Dogu, Suleyman Alici, Tulay Akman, Metin Ozkan, Ulku Yalcintas Aslan, Ayse Gok Durnali, Mustafa Benekli.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
PURPOSE: The frequency of bilateral breast cancer is 1.4-11.0% among all breast cancers. It can present as synchronous (SC) or metachronous (MC). Data regarding clinical course of bilateral breast cancer are scarce. In this study, we therefore evaluated demographic, pathological and clinical characteristics, treatments and responses in bilateral breast cancer cases; making distinctions between metachronous-synchronous and comparing with historic one-sided data for the same parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty bilateral breast cancer cases from ten different centers between 2000 and 2011 were retrospectively scanned. Age of the cases, family history, menopausal status, pathological features, pathological stages, neoadjuvant, surgery, adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy/radiotherapy were examined in the context of the first and second occurrence and discussed with reference to the literature.
RESULTS: Metachronous and synchronous groups showed similar age, menopausal status, tumor type, HER2/neu expression; the family history tumor grade, tumor stage, ER-negativity rate, local and distant metastases rates, surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy application rates were identified as significantly different. Palliative chemotherapy response rate was greater in the metachronous group but median PFS rates did not differ between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Although bilateral breast cancer is not frequent, MC breast cancer is different from SC breast cancer by having more advanced grade, stage, less ER expression, more frequent rates of local relapse and distant metastasis and better response to chemotherapy in case of relapse/metastasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23167382     DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.9.4571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


  4 in total

1.  Are synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancers different? An immunohistochemical analysis aimed at intrinsic tumor phenotype.

Authors:  Elżbieta Senkus; Jolanta Szade; Beata Pieczyńska; Anna Zaczek; Joanna Pikiel; Katarzyna Sosińska-Mielcarek; Agnieszka Karpińska; Jacek Jassem
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-12-15

2.  Association of molecular subtype concordance and survival outcome in synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer.

Authors:  Shuning Ding; Xi Sun; Shuangshuang Lu; Zheng Wang; Xiaosong Chen; Kunwei Shen
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  The prognostic comparison among unilateral, bilateral, synchronous bilateral, and metachronous bilateral breast cancer: A meta-analysis of studies from recent decade (2008-2018).

Authors:  Bo Pan; Ying Xu; Yi-Dong Zhou; Ru Yao; Huan-Wen Wu; Qing-Li Zhu; Chang-Jun Wang; Feng Mao; Yan Lin; Song-Jie Shen; Qiang Sun
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  A clinicopathological study of early-stage synchronous bilateral breast cancer: a retrospective evaluation and prospective validation of potential risk factors.

Authors:  Jia-Jian Chen; Yan Wang; Jing-Yan Xue; Ying Chen; Ya-Ling Chen; Qin Xiao; Wen-Tao Yang; Zhi-Min Shao; Jiong Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.