Literature DB >> 24427357

Are synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancers different? An immunohistochemical analysis aimed at intrinsic tumor phenotype.

Elżbieta Senkus1, Jolanta Szade2, Beata Pieczyńska2, Anna Zaczek3, Joanna Pikiel4, Katarzyna Sosińska-Mielcarek4, Agnieszka Karpińska5, Jacek Jassem1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The biology and pathomechanism of bilateral breast cancers is not fully understood. We compared the morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of primary tumors in patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancers and metachronous bilateral breast cancers, with special focus on intrinsic tumor phenotype.
METHODS: Tumor morphology and expression of 8 immunohistochemical markers were assessed in tissue microarrays containing primary breast tumor cores from 113 metachronous bilateral breast cancers and 61 synchronous bilateral breast cancers. Analyzed markers included hormone receptors (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor), HER2, Ki67, cytokeratin 5/6, E-cadherin, vimentin and epidermal growth factor receptor. Cutoff levels are provided in the table.
RESULTS: Metachronous bilateral breast cancers tumors had lower estrogen receptor expression (p=0.047) and higher expression of cytokeratin 5/6 (p=0.017) and of vimentin (p=0.008); in multivariate analysis only vimentin retained the significance (p=0.01). Ten (13%) and 11 (26%) of metachronous bilateral breast cancers and synchronous bilateral breast cancers had luminal A phenotype, 39 (50%) and 15 (36%) were luminal B HER2-negative, 13 (17%) and 12 (28%) - luminal B HER2-positive, 3 (4%) and 2 (5%) - HER2-positive (not luminal), and 12 (16%) and 2 (5%) had triple negative phenotype (p=0.07).
CONCLUSION: Metachronous bilateral breast cancers, compared to synchronous bilateral breast cancers, are characterized by more aggressive phenotype, expressed by lower expression of estrogen receptor and stronger expression of cytokeratin 5/6 and vimentin; this does not, however, translate into differences in the distribution of intrinsic tumor phenotypes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bilateral breast cancer; immunohistochemistry; intrinsic phenotype; metachronous; synchronous

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24427357      PMCID: PMC3885491     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol        ISSN: 1936-2625


  56 in total

1.  Risk factors and age-incidence relationships for contralateral breast cancer.

Authors:  P Vaittinen; K Hemminki
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  High constant incidence in twins and other relatives of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  J Peto; T M Mack
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 3.  Epidemiology of contralateral breast cancer.

Authors:  Y Chen; W Thompson; R Semenciw; Y Mao
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Prognostic significance of synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer.

Authors:  J Kollias; I O Ellis; C W Elston; R W Blamey
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Incidence of second primary breast cancer among women with a first primary in Manitoba, Canada.

Authors:  Y Chen; R Semenciw; E Kliewer; Y Shi; Y Mao
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status and cancer family history of Danish women affected with multifocal or bilateral breast cancer at a young age.

Authors:  J T Bergthorsson; B Ejlertsen; J H Olsen; A Borg; K V Nielsen; R B Barkardottir; S Klausen; H T Mouridsen; K Winther; K Fenger; A Niebuhr; T L Harboe; E Niebuhr
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Bilateral synchronous breast cancer: mode of detection and comparison of histologic features between the 2 breasts.

Authors:  E S Hungness; M Safa; E A Shaughnessy; B S Aron; P A Gazder; H H Hawkins; E E Lower; C Seeskin; R S Yassin; P O Hasselgren
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Differences in estrogen receptor status, HER2, and p53 comparing metachronous bilateral breast carcinoma.

Authors:  K Matsuo; T Fukutomi; H Tsuda; S Akashi-Tanaka; C Shimizu; T Hasegawa
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Evaluation of prognostic factors in stage IIA breast tumors and their correlation with mortality risk.

Authors:  Solange Torchia Carvalho; Monica Maria Stiepcich; José Humberto Fregnani; Sueli Nonogaki; Rafael Rocha; Fernando Augusto Soares
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in patients with bilateral breast cancer.

Authors:  D Steinmann; M Bremer; D Rades; B Skawran; C Siebrands; J H Karstens; T Dörk
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  A comparative clinicopathological and survival analysis of synchronous bilateral breast cancers.

Authors:  Yan Bai; Junliang Lu; Huanwen Wu; Jing Wang; Yiru Niu; Junyi Pang; Shafei Wu; Yuanyuan Liu; Zhiyong Liang
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.130

Review 2.  [Genital metastases from breast cancer: study of 3 cases and literature review].

Authors:  Olfa Zoukar; Anis Haddad; Amira Daldoul; Sonia Zaied; Amina Ben Salem; Ines Zouari; Raja Faleh
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2018-05-04

3.  Clinicopathological Characteristics, Treatment and Outcome of 123 Patients with Synchronous or Metachronous Bilateral Breast Cancer in a Swiss Institutional Retrospective Series.

Authors:  Alexandre Huber; Stéphanie J Seidler; Daniela E Huber
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2020-04-01

4.  Genomic imbalances and MYB fusion in synchronous bilateral adenoid cystic carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Anikó Kovács; Fredrik Persson; Marta Persson; Mattias K Andersson; Göran Stenman
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.