Literature DB >> 23166532

DNA barcoding of fish, insects, and shellfish in Korea.

Dae-Won Kim1, Won Gi Yoo, Hyun Chul Park, Hye Sook Yoo, Dong Won Kang, Seon Deok Jin, Hong Ki Min, Woon Kee Paek, Jeongheui Lim.   

Abstract

DNA barcoding has been widely used in species identification and biodiversity research. A short fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) sequence serves as a DNA bio-barcode. We collected DNA barcodes, based on COI sequences from 156 species (529 sequences) of fish, insects, and shellfish. We present results on phylogenetic relationships to assess biodiversity the in the Korean peninsula. Average GC% contents of the 68 fish species (46.9%), the 59 shellfish species (38.0%), and the 29 insect species (33.2%) are reported. Using the Kimura 2 parameter in all possible pairwise comparisons, the average interspecific distances were compared with the average intraspecific distances in fish (3.22 vs. 0.41), insects (2.06 vs. 0.25), and shellfish (3.58 vs. 0.14). Our results confirm that distance-based DNA barcoding provides sufficient information to identify and delineate fish, insect, and shellfish species by means of all possible pairwise comparisons. These results also confirm that the development of an effective molecular barcode identification system is possible. All DNA barcode sequences collected from our study will be useful for the interpretation of species-level identification and community-level patterns in fish, insects, and shellfish in Korea, although at the species level, the rate of correct identification in a diversified environment might be low.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cytochrome c oxidase subunit I; mitochondrial DNA; molecular taxonomy; taxonomic DNA barcoding

Year:  2012        PMID: 23166532      PMCID: PMC3492657          DOI: 10.5808/GI.2012.10.3.206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genomics Inform        ISSN: 1598-866X


Introduction

DNA barcoding is a simple and useful step toward understanding the ecosystem. It also serves to further our interests in biodiversity research [1]. A short standardized sequence (400-800 bp) of DNA can be used to distinguish individuals of a species. This approach was taken, because genetic diversity between species is markedly greater than that within species [2]. Numerous computational analysis methods and systems have been introduced for this purpose [3-5]. The use of this system can provide rapid, accurate, cost-effective, and automatable process for species identification. The success rate of each barcoding application varies significantly among groups. Moreover, global datasets that represent extensive ecosystems are expected to be subjected to particular difficulties, especially in groups in which recent speciation rates are high and effective population sizes are large and reasonably stationary [6]. Several studies of species-level identification have covered many groups of organisms, including birds, fishes, and various arthropods [4, 6-8]. In order to use the barcoding system for species identification, cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) sequences were obtained in this study from 529 sequences, representing 156 species from fish, insects, and shellfish in the Korean peninsula.

Methods

The first community-level barcoding studies were conducted in the most diverse terrestrial and marine ecosystems in an inland and coastal area of South Korea (include reference). We collected samples to obtain an overview of the variation patterns for 529 COI sequences among 68 fish species, 29 insect species, and 59 shellfish species. Multiple specimens were collected for most of the species. Fish and shellfish were collected from Yeosu in Jeollanam-do; shellfish were collected from Taean; and insects were collected from Chungcheongnam-do, Gangwon-do, Gyeongsangbuk-do, and Jeollabuk-do in South Korea. Samples were collected using different, technically appropriate methods (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 1) [9]. If possible, the samples were obtained from widely distributed places in South Korea.
Fig. 1

Map showing the locations of the cruises and the materials collected in this study. Each circle represents one sampling locality, and circle size is proportional to the number of samples in our study. Google Map was used (http://maps.google.co.kr) [9].

Genomic DNA was isolated from samples using the Qiagen DNeasy 96 blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the instructions. DNA fragments of target genes were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primers for the COI gene (primer sequences: LCO1490 GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG and HCO 2198 TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA) [10]. PCR amplification was performed using Top-Taq PreMix (2×; CoreBio, Seoul, Korea) under the following conditions: denaturation (1 min at 94℃), annealing at 51℃ for amplification of the COI gene, and extension (2 min at 72℃). PCR products were purified with the Core-One PCR purification kit (CoreBio), and TA cloning was performed using the pGEM-T Easy Vector system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) by Macrogen Inc. The clones for each marker were sequenced with forward (SP6) and reverse (T7) primers using an ABI 3730XL sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers HM180413-HM180941. To obtain the species information for each operational taxonomic unit (OTU) in a phylogenetic tree, a BLAST search was performed using the BLASTN program from NCBI [11]. A cutoff value for the BLAST result was established as follows: query coverage > 90% and identity > 75% for COI. The levels of sequence divergence within and between the selected species were investigated using the pairwise Kimura 2 parameter (K2P) distance model [12]. The neighbor-joining tree, with gap positions ignored on a pairwise basis, was constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with K2P distances in MEGA4 [13]. These distances were hierarchically arranged in accordance with intraspecific and interspecific species differences within each genus. When the sequence dataset consisted of only 2 genera from the same family, an intergeneric comparison within the family was not performed.

Results and Discussion

After BLASTN annotation analyses were conducted, K2P distances were compared at different taxonomic levels, revealing distinct features in the sequences both within and between species. With respect to the COI sequences of the 156 species represented, the interspecific K2P distances for the COI sequences from the 68 fish species, the 59 shellfish species, and the 29 insect species ranged from 0% to 45.25% (fish, 0% to 40.99%; insects, 0% to 10.34%; shellfish, 0% to 45.25%) (Fig. 2A), whereas the intraspecific K2P distances with ≥3 sequences ranged from 0% to 0.985% (fish, 0% to 0.985%; insects, 0.005% to 0.635%; shellfish, 0% to 0.817%) (Fig. 2B). The average interspecific distances and average intraspecific distances were, respectively, 3.58 and 0.14 in shellfish, 3.22 and 0.41 in fish, and 2.06 and 0.25 in insects (Table 1). In shellfish, the greatest interspecific K2P differences were 25.57-fold higher than the intraspecific values. The overall base composition in each species of fish, insect, and shellfish was as follows: T (thymine) ranged from 27.4% to 33.7% (highly abundant); G (guanine) ranged from 16.8% to 21.5% (not highly abundant) (Table 1). These findings for fish were consistent with previous studies showing that T occurred more frequently and G occurred less frequently than A (adenine) and C (cytosine) [8].
Fig. 2

Distribution of interspecific Kimura 2 parameter (K2P) distances for cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) sequences from the 68 fish species, the 59 shellfish species, and the 29 insect species. Vertical lines show the mean pairwise distance at each level. The X- and Y-axes represent K2P distance values and the percentage of individuals, respectively. (A) Interspecific K2P distances. (B) Intraspecific K2P distances.

Table 1

Mean percentage base composition, comparing COI sequences and K2P distance among fish, insects, and shellfish

When multiple individuals were collected for any one species, a single sequence was selected at random. COI, cytochrome c oxidase subunit I; K2P, Kimura 2 parameter.

In our polytypic species analysis with more than 3 individuals in each species, the average intraspecific difference was approximately 0.5%, and the maximum intraspecific divergence was only 1.86% (Table 2). The highest overall GC% content was found in the 18 species of fish. Lower values were found in the 2 species of insects and in the 6 species of shellfish (Table 2). The fish Chelidonichthys spinosus had a high GC% content of 50.9%. The mean GC% content of the 18 barcoded fish species was higher than that of the 6 shellfish species (46.9 ± 2.2% vs. 38.0 ± 4.9%) (see also Table 2). Sixteen of the 21 species with GC% content ≥45% were fish, whereas only 1 shellfish species exhibited GC% content ≥45%. The GC% content can be used in a new approach to evaluate animal evolutionary relationships, although the relationship between GC% content and the evolutionary branching date is not very accurate [14]. Moreover, the average divergence of congeneric species pairs was greater than that found for intraspecific differences, but 10 species in 5 genera had interspecific distances below 0.1% (Table 3). These species included Hexagrammos agrammus/H. otakii, Ampedus humeralis/A. subcostatus, Anomala luculenta/A. mongolica, Chlorostoma argyrostoma turbinatum/C. turbinate, and Omphalius rusticus rusticus/O. pfeifferi carpenteri. In addition, the NJ tree exhibited shallow interspecific divergence except at the first deep divergence (Fig. 3). In fish, several clades had a high level of bootstrap support (≥97%) (Fig. 3A). These clades included Thrysa chefuensis and T. adelae, Hexagrammos otakii and H. agrammus. In insects, the clades that had a high level of bootstrap support (≥95%) included Fusinus forceps, F. longicaudus, Mytilus galloprovincialis, and M. edulis. In shellfish, 2 clades separated out with a high level of bootstrap support (≥99%) (Fig. 3B). These clades included Anomala mongolica and A. luculenta, Ampedus humeralis and A. subcostatus (Fig. 3C).
Table 2

Maximum intraspecific distance and GC% content among fish, insects, and shellfish (threshold > 0.5%)

Table 3

Maximum Kimura 2 parameter (K2P) distances with congeneric species pairs

Fig. 3

The neighbor-joining tree of fish, insects, and shellfish based on cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) sequences. (A) Fish. (B) Insects. (C) Shellfish.

In conclusion, we obtained DNA barcodes using COI sequences from fish, insects, and shellfish. The aims of this research were species identification and contribution to biodiversity research. At the species level, the rate of correct identifications might be low in a diversified environment. However, DNA barcoded sequences can be used for the interpretation of species-level identification and community-level patterns in fish, insects, and shellfish.
  13 in total

1.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Alina Cywinska; Shelley L Ball; Jeremy R deWaard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  BLAST: at the core of a powerful and diverse set of sequence analysis tools.

Authors:  Scott McGinnis; Thomas L Madden
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL.

Authors:  R D Ward; R Hanner; P D N Hebert
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.051

4.  DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Daniel H Janzen; John M Burns; Winnie Hallwachs; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  DNA barcodes: genes, genomics, and bioinformatics.

Authors:  W John Kress; David L Erickson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Limited performance of DNA barcoding in a diverse community of tropical butterflies.

Authors:  Marianne Elias; Ryan I Hill; Keith R Willmott; Kanchon K Dasmahapatra; Andrew V Z Brower; James Mallet; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  DNA barcoding Australia's fish species.

Authors:  Robert D Ward; Tyler S Zemlak; Bronwyn H Innes; Peter R Last; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates.

Authors:  O Folmer; M Black; W Hoeh; R Lutz; R Vrijenhoek
Journal:  Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol       Date:  1994-10

10.  iBarcode.org: web-based molecular biodiversity analysis.

Authors:  Gregory A C Singer; Mehrdad Hajibabaei
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  4 in total

1.  DNA Barcoding and Phylogenomic Analysis of the Genus Fritillaria in China Based on Complete Chloroplast Genomes.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Haisu Hu; Dequan Zhang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.753

2.  The complete plastomes of seven Peucedanum plants: comparative and phylogenetic analyses for the Peucedanum genus.

Authors:  Chang-Kun Liu; Jia-Qing Lei; Qiu-Ping Jiang; Song-Dong Zhou; Xing-Jin He
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.215

3.  Can DNA barcoding accurately discriminate megadiverse Neotropical freshwater fish fauna?

Authors:  Luiz H G Pereira; Robert Hanner; Fausto Foresti; Claudio Oliveira
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 2.797

4.  First Molecular Identification of Symbiotic Archaea in a Sponge Collected from the Persian Gulf, Iran.

Authors:  Akram Najafi; Maryam Moradinasab; Mohammad Seyedabadi; Mohammad A Haghighi; Iraj Nabipour
Journal:  Open Microbiol J       Date:  2018-10-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.