Literature DB >> 23164957

Relationship between airborne detection of influenza A virus and the number of infected pigs.

Cesar A Corzo1, Anna Romagosa, Scott A Dee, Marie R Gramer, Robert B Morrison, Montserrat Torremorell.   

Abstract

Influenza A virus infects a wide range of species including both birds and mammals (including humans). One of the key routes by which the virus can infect populations of animals is by aerosol transmission. This study explored the relationship between number of infected pigs and the probability of detecting influenza virus RNA in bioaerosols through the course of an acute infection. Bioaerosols were collected using a cyclonic collector in two groups of 7 week-old pigs that were experimentally infected by exposure with a contact infected pig (seeder pig). After contact exposure, individual pig nasal swab samples were collected daily and air samples were collected three times per day for 8 days. All samples were tested for influenza by real-time reverse transcriptase (RRT)-PCR targeting the influenza virus matrix gene. All pigs' nasal swabs became influenza virus RRT-PCR positive upon exposure to the infected seeder pig. Airborne influenza was detected in 28/43 (65%) air samples. The temporal dynamics of influenza virus detection in air samples was in close agreement with the nasal shedding pattern in the infected pigs. First detection of positive bioaerosols happened at 1 day post contact (DPC). Positive bioaerosols were consistently detected between 3 and 6 DPC, a time when most pigs were also shedding virus in nasal secretions. Overall, the odds of detecting a positive air sample increased 2.2 times for every additional nasal swab positive pig in the group. In summary, there was a strong relationship between the number of pigs shedding influenza virus in nasal secretions and the generation of bioaerosols during the course of an acute infection.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23164957      PMCID: PMC3582798          DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet J        ISSN: 1090-0233            Impact factor:   2.688


  34 in total

Review 1.  The pathogenesis and diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease.

Authors:  S Alexandersen; Z Zhang; A I Donaldson; A J M Garland
Journal:  J Comp Pathol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.311

Review 2.  Avian and swine influenza viruses: our current understanding of the zoonotic risk.

Authors:  Kristen Van Reeth
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.683

3.  Detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae by air sampling with a nested PCR assay.

Authors:  K D Stärk; J Nicolet; J Frey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Influence of isolate pathogenicity on the aerosol transmission of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Authors:  Jenny G Cho; John Deen; Scott A Dee
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.310

5.  Detection of airborne influenza a virus in experimentally infected pigs with maternally derived antibodies.

Authors:  C A Corzo; M Allerson; M Gramer; R B Morrison; M Torremorell
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.005

6.  The epidemiology and evolution of influenza viruses in pigs.

Authors:  I H Brown
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2000-05-22       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Further evaluation of alternative air-filtration systems for reducing the transmission of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by aerosol.

Authors:  Scott A Dee; John Deen; Jean Paul Cano; Laura Batista; Carlos Pijoan
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.310

8.  Herd factors associated with the seroprevalences of four major respiratory pathogens in slaughter pigs from farrow-to-finish pig herds.

Authors:  D Maes; H Deluyker; M Verdonck; F Castryck; C Miry; B Vrijens; A de Kruif
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.683

9.  Protection against a European H1N2 swine influenza virus in pigs previously infected with H1N1 and/or H3N2 subtypes.

Authors:  Kristien Van Reeth; Vicki Gregory; Alan Hay; Maurice Pensaert
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Experimental infection of pigs with the porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV): measure of viral excretion.

Authors:  E Bourgueil; E Hutet; R Cariolet; P Vannier
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  15 in total

1.  Bioaerosol Sampling in Modern Agriculture: A Novel Approach for Emerging Pathogen Surveillance?

Authors:  Benjamin D Anderson; Mengmeng Ma; Yao Xia; Tao Wang; Bo Shu; John A Lednicky; Mai-Juan Ma; Jiahai Lu; Gregory C Gray
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 2.  Epidemic status of Swine influenza virus in china.

Authors:  Weili Kong; Jiahui Ye; Shangsong Guan; Jinhua Liu; Juan Pu
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.461

3.  Airborne detection and quantification of swine influenza a virus in air samples collected inside, outside and downwind from swine barns.

Authors:  Cesar A Corzo; Marie Culhane; Scott Dee; Robert B Morrison; Montserrat Torremorell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Molecular epidemiology of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus among humans and swine, Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Harsha K K Perera; Dhanasekaran Vijaykrishna; Akuratiya G Premarathna; Chrishan J S Jayamaha; Geethani Wickramasinghe; Chung L Cheung; Ming F Yeung; Leo L M Poon; Aluthgama K C Perera; Ian G Barr; Yi Guan; Malik Peiris
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.883

5.  Airborne Influenza A Is Detected in the Personal Breathing Zone of Swine Veterinarians.

Authors:  Kate M O'Brien; Matthew W Nonnenmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Maternally-derived antibodies do not prevent transmission of swine influenza A virus between pigs.

Authors:  Charlie Cador; Séverine Hervé; Mathieu Andraud; Stéphane Gorin; Frédéric Paboeuf; Nicolas Barbier; Stéphane Quéguiner; Céline Deblanc; Gaëlle Simon; Nicolas Rose
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.683

Review 7.  The Use of Bioaerosol Sampling for Airborne Virus Surveillance in Swine Production Facilities: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Benjamin D Anderson; John A Lednicky; Montserrat Torremorell; Gregory C Gray
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-07-27

Review 8.  Influenza virus aerosols in the air and their infectiousness.

Authors:  Nikolai Nikitin; Ekaterina Petrova; Ekaterina Trifonova; Olga Karpova
Journal:  Adv Virol       Date:  2014-08-13

9.  Evidence of infectivity of airborne porcine epidemic diarrhea virus and detection of airborne viral RNA at long distances from infected herds.

Authors:  Carmen Alonso; Dane P Goede; Robert B Morrison; Peter R Davies; Albert Rovira; Douglas G Marthaler; Montserrat Torremorell
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.683

10.  Evaluation of an electrostatic particle ionization technology for decreasing airborne pathogens in pigs.

Authors:  Carmen Alonso; Peter C Raynor; Peter R Davies; Robert B Morrison; Montserrat Torremorell
Journal:  Aerobiologia (Bologna)       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.