Literature DB >> 23164628

Self-controlled knowledge of results: age-related differences in motor learning, strategies, and error detection.

Michael J Carter1, Jae T Patterson.   

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that a self-controlled KR schedule is advantageous for motor learning; however, the usefulness of a self-controlled KR context in older adults remains unknown. To address this gap in knowledge, we examined whether (1) the learning benefits of a self-controlled KR schedule are modulated by the age of the learner; (2) practicing in a self-controlled KR context concurrently strengthens the learner's error detection mechanism, and (3) the KR strategy during acquisition changes as a function of practice trials completed and age. As a function of age, participants were quasirandomly assigned to either the self-control or yoked group resulting in four experimental groups (Self-Young, Yoked-Young, Self-Old, and Yoked-Old). The results revealed the Self-Young group: (1) demonstrated superior retention performance than all other groups (p<.05); (2) was more accurate in estimating motor performance than all other groups during retention (p<.05), and (3) self-reported a switch in their strategy for requesting KR during acquisition based on the number of practice trials completed. Collectively, our findings suggest that older adults do not demonstrate the same learning benefits of a self-controlled KR context as younger adults which may be attributed to differences in KR strategies.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23164628     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  7 in total

1.  Not all choices are created equal: Task-relevant choices enhance motor learning compared to task-irrelevant choices.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

2.  An interpolated activity during the knowledge-of-results delay interval eliminates the learning advantages of self-controlled feedback schedules.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-18

3.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex does not enhance the learning benefits of self-controlled feedback schedules.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Victoria Smith; Anthony N Carlsen; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-02-27

4.  Exercising choice over feedback schedules during practice is not advantageous for motor learning.

Authors:  Laura St Germain; Brad McKay; Andrew Poskus; Allison Williams; Olena Leshchyshen; Sherry Feldman; Joshua G A Cashaback; Michael J Carter
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-09-26

5.  Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance: a replication and extension of Chiviacowsky and Wulf (2005).

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Anthony N Carlsen; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-19

6.  Self-Control of Haptic Assistance for Motor Learning: Influences of Frequency and Opinion of Utility.

Authors:  Camille K Williams; Victrine Tseung; Heather Carnahan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-04

7.  Self-controlled practice and nudging during structural learning of a novel control interface.

Authors:  Mei-Hua Lee; Shanie A L Jayasinghe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.