Standard histopathology techniques (including paraffin embedding) are incompatible with thick tissue multiphoton imaging, and standard clearing techniques on those specimens destroy some molecular information. We demonstrate multiphoton imaging in specimens prepared according to standard histopathology techniques. This permits unlabeled 3-dimensional histology on archival tissue banks, which is of great value in evaluating prognostic indicators.
Standard histopathology techniques (including paraffin embedding) are incompatible with thick tissue multiphoton imaging, and standard clearing techniques on those specimens destroy some molecular information. We demonstrate multiphoton imaging in specimens prepared according to standard histopathology techniques. This permits unlabeled 3-dimensional histology on archival tissue banks, which is of great value in evaluating prognostic indicators.
Multiphoton laser scanning microscopy enables 3-dimensional (3D), high-resolution imaging in
thick tissue samples and in vivo [1,2]. Though initially demonstrated with two-photon fluorescence, multiphoton
techniques accessing a broad range of label-free, molecule-specific, contrasts are being developed
at an exciting pace [3]. These techniques could greatly aid
pathologists by providing label-free structural and molecular contrast—they can directly
visualize 3D tissue architecture (see for example [4]) and
extract chemical information from pathology specimens, such as identifying differences in
pigmentation chemistry between melanoma and ‘pre-cancerous’ dysplastic nevi [5] or localizing senile plaques in Alzheimer’s disease via
autofluorescence [6]. However, the application of multiphoton
techniques to routinely-prepared paraffin-embedded pathology specimens has been limited by optical
scattering [7] to thin tissue sections (~5 μm). Though
various optical clearing methods have been extraordinarily successful with fresh and fixed tissue
[8,9], these techniques
either use harsh chemicals (for example, they would dissolve melanin) or are incompatible with prior
paraffin embedding. Here, we investigate a more gentle clearing protocol, in which a mixture of
mineral oil and glycerol is found to enable 3D multiphoton histology in paraffin-embedded tissue
specimens.Pathology specimens (such as biopsies) are normally prepared by fixing the tissue in formalin,
embedding it in paraffin wax, mechanically sectioning the block to make slides, and archiving the
remainder of the block. These archives of human tissue can be extremely valuable in epidemiologic
studies [10] or for re-evaluating old cases with newer, more
accurate diagnostic methods. For example, investigations into recurrences of melanoma in patients
with negative sentinel lymph node biopsies revealed that the standard procedure at the time failed
to detect ‘occult’ metastases that were found upon a painstaking re-evaluation by
serial sectioning [11]. Of course, preparing and viewing a
series of 5 μm sections through an entire lymph node is laborious, time-consuming, and poses
challenges for accurate volume reconstruction. Investigating successive thick sections (several
hundred micrometers) could be much more efficient, but the paraffin scattering prevents imaging in
sections thicker than a few microns.The solution we demonstrate here is to deparaffinize the blocks and replace the solvent with a
suitable fluid for imaging (the commonly used solvent xylene is volatile and toxic). Various optical
clearing protocols have been developed to match the optical index of the tissue components to the
fluid medium [12,13].
The most impressive of these are Scale [8],
benzyl alcohol-benzyl benzoate (BABB) [9,14], and FocusClear [15]. However,
Scale is very sensitive to tissue preparation procedures, making it incompatible
with previously paraffinized tissue, and benzyl alcohol in BABB and the DMSO in FocusClear are known
to dissolve melanin [16,17], making them unsuitable for pigmented specimens.A number of more gentle clearing agents have been well-characterized and reviewed, including
glycerol, glycol, polyethylene glycol, propylene glycol, etc [12]. Of particular interest in clearing deparaffinized specimens is the combination of
mineral oil (which is essentially liquid paraffin) and glycerol. Though mineral oil alone has not
been observed to induce optical clearing [18], its mixture
with glycerol enhances penetration, and has been shown to improve imaging depth in OCT in vivo
[19]. (Mineral oil itself has even been used as a
deparaffinization agent in preparing histology slides [20,21].) Here we show that the perfusion of thick,
deparaffinized tissue with a mixture of mineral oil and glycerol restores multiphoton imaging depth
to that achievable in non-paraffinized specimens. We demonstrate this with the two most common
multiphoton techniques, autofluorescence and second harmonic generation, and investigate the
scattering properties of these cleared specimens.
2. Methods
Freshly excised mouse organs (kidney, liver, spleen, heart, lung, brain, and skin from 12 week
old BALB/c mice) were prepared by two methods for comparison—non-paraffinized (NP) and
paraffinized-deparaffinized (DP)—both according to standard histology procedures up until the
immersion in the mineral oil/glycerol mixture. The NP specimens were fixed in formalin (10%),
dehydrated through alcohol passages, and directly immersed in a 1:1 mixture of mineral oil and
glycerol, under vacuum (to degas the tissue and aid penetration) for 2 hours at room temperature,
without having undergone paraffin embedding. The DP specimens were first processed as normal for
histopathology, being fixed in formalin, dehydrated, then embedded in paraffin wax. Then the block
was deparaffinized by first melting the block at 65° C, then using xylene and alcohol
passages, and infiltrated with a 1:1 mineral oil and glycerol mixture under vacuum for 2 hours at
room temperature. Lungs were inflated before fixation to preserve alveolar structure.Imaging was performed with a home-built multiphoton laser scanning microscope, with ~200 fs
optical pulses supplied by a Ti:sapphire oscillator (Spectra Physics Tsunami) operating at 810 nm.
We used a 40x 0.8 NA water immersion objective (for its long working distance), and placed a
coverslip on top of the intact specimen to provide a barrier between the oil/glycerol mixture and
the immersion water column (though in principal, an objective designed for oil/glycerol immersion
would improve our results). Optical power, unless otherwise specified, was approximately 35 mW.
Fluorescence is directed by a dichroic mirror (680 nm long-pass) to a photomultiplier tube
(Hamamatsu, R3896, with a 600 nm short-pass filter (Thorlabs FES0600) and BG-39 glass to reject
residual excitation light. This setup collects second-harmonic light and multiphoton
autofluorescence simultaneously, in the same channel. Imaging depth is controlled by raising and
lowering the microscope objective. For each organ, we acquired a z stack, 300 μm deep, with 3
μm steps, 4.9 μs pixel dwell time, 512x512 pixels, for an approximately 260 μm
lateral field of view (FOV), unless otherwise specified. The organs were imaged with their outer
surface in contact with the coverslip—no cutting or sectioning was performed.
3. Results
Images of each organ at selected depths are shown in Figs.
1-6, along with a profile of average signal intensity
with respect to depth. The depth profiles for each image stack were calculated for a 32 × 32
μm region of interest, selected to avoid surface irregularities. The displayed image
brightness is normalized so that black pixels are 0 (no signal), and white pixels are four standard
deviations above the mean pixel brightness. Each image shown is a 130 × 130 μm FOV;
the full 260 × 260 μm FOV for the top 100 μm of each stack is shown in
Media 1-12.
Photobleaching was observed with repeated imaging.
Fig. 1
Kidney, 130 μm FOV. (NP image acquired with 256 x 256 pixel resolution for the 260
μm field of view) For full 260 μm FOV, see Media
1 and Media
2.
Fig. 6
Brain, 130 μm FOV. For full 260 μm FOV, see Media
11 and Media
12.
In the kidney, Fig. 1
, the convoluted tubules are apparent in both NP and DP tissue preparations. The visibility of
cells and nuclei is comparable between NP and DP. In the top layers of the DP z stack, blood cells
can be seen in the peritubular capillaries. We were able to image slightly deeper into the DP
specimen.Kidney, 130 μm FOV. (NP image acquired with 256 x 256 pixel resolution for the 260
μm field of view) For full 260 μm FOV, see Media
1 and Media
2.In the liver, Fig. 2
, hepatocytes with grainy cytoplasm and dark nuclei are clear in the NP, but not the DP
samples. However, gross architectural features such as sinusoids and hepatic arteries can be
observed in both. Imaging depth appears comparable, but the DP cells appear damaged.
Fig. 2
Liver, 130 μm FOV. For full 260 μm FOV, see Media
3 and Media
4.
Liver, 130 μm FOV. For full 260 μm FOV, see Media
3 and Media
4.In the spleen, Fig. 3
, it is difficult to discern any difference between white and red pulp, though the structure
in the NP image stack suggests that a marginal sinus separating white and red pulp is in view. The
NP images are slightly clearer than DP, though signal falloff with respect to depth is
comparable.
Fig. 3
Spleen, 130 μm FOV. For full 260 μm FOV, see Media
5 and Media
6.
Spleen, 130 μm FOV. For full 260 μm FOV, see Media
5 and Media
6.In the heart, Fig. 4
, striation pattern is from second-harmonic generated in myosin [22], the nuclei appear dark. We observe somewhat better imaging depth and clearer
images in NP samples. Microvasculature, including blood cells, can be observed in the full z stack
movies (online).
Fig. 4
Heart, 130 μm FOV. For full 260 μm FOV, see Media
7 and Media
8.
Heart, 130 μm FOV. For full 260 μm FOV, see Media
7 and Media
8.In the lung, Fig. 5
, the alveolar structure is clear in both NP and DP tissue. The non-monotonic features in the
decay curve results from the large regions devoid of tissue.
Fig. 5
Lung, 130 μm FOV. For full 260 μm FOV, see Media
9 and Media 10.
Lung, 130 μm FOV. For full 260 μm FOV, see Media
9 and Media 10.Finally, in the brain, Fig. 6
, the greatest imaging depth was achieved—in excess of 250 μm in both NP and DP
preparations. These images suggest that the transition between the molecular and granular layers is
more prominent in NP specimen than in DP, while microvasculature was more visible in the DP
specimen. Nuclei, however, are not visible in either preparation.Brain, 130 μm FOV. For full 260 μm FOV, see Media
11 and Media
12.
Volume imaging
Figure 7
shows a 3D volume rendering of a 260 × 260 × 65 μm section of a lung
(acquired as a z stack with 0.5 μm z-step, rendered with Avizo; an exponential correction
factor was applied to normalize the brightness of each slice). Clearing agents like
Scale and BABB make tissue fragile [8,23], potentially posing a challenge for delicate tissues. In our
method using oil and glycerol, we do not observe differences in handling properties between NP and
DP samples.
Fig. 7
Volume rendering of a 260 × 260 × 65 μm section of lung.
Volume rendering of a 260 × 260 × 65 μm section of lung.
4. Discussion and conclusions
The contrast in these images is provided by multiphoton autofluorescence and second harmonic
generation. Though both have been previously observed from fixed, cleared tissue [14], the observations here are the first to be reported from intact
tissue that had been embedded in paraffin. The autofluorescence intensity in these specimens was
significantly brighter than our previous experience with live tissue [24,25], leading us to attribute the source
of autofluorescence not to intrinsic biological fluorophores, but to a byproduct of formalin
fixation [26,27]. In
this sense, the fixation process itself serves as a useful biological stain. The NP images were
generally of higher quality than the DP images (likely a result of damage by the heating and cooling
necessary for paraffin embedding [28]). In contrast to
autofluorescence, SHG is not attributed to the fixative and is preserved during clearing (glycerol
has been observed to dissociate collagen in fresh tissue [29], but the formaldehyde cross-linking process likely protects collagen from this effect in
fixed tissue). We have observed SHG in the heart muscle, where it originates primarily from myosin
(Fig. 4). We have also observed SHG from collagen both in NP
and DP skin specimens (data not shown; the heterogeneity of the tissue makes it hard to compare the
depth profile between non-paraffinized and de-paraffinized samples). It is important to point out
that the reduced scattering loss through the index matching mechanism offers the same benefits for
other imaging contrasts, such as transient absorption microscopy [30].The achievable imaging depth might be improved by optimizing the oil:glycerol ratio and clearing
time [19] or exploring other fluids [12,13]. Further gains can be achieved with
instrumentation modifications such as spatio-temporal focusing [31] or spatial overlap modulation [32]. Also, the use
of longer wavelengths can improve imaging depth [33] (though
fluorescence is very sensitive to wavelength, several nonlinear contrast mechanisms are able to
operate at arbitrary wavelengths, such as harmonic generation [34], four wave mixing [35], and nonlinear phase
[36,37]).The primary significance of our findings is the demonstration that multiphoton imaging can be
employed on specimens stored in paraffin blocks, enabling retrospective studies. With minimal sample
preparation, this technique enables easily accessible 3D histology on existing tissue archives. This
ability could offer additional benefits to pathology. For example, if ambiguities arise from tissue
processing (due to folding or unfavorable section selection), they could be resolved by 3D
reconstruction. Though the oil/glycerol mixture cannot rival Scale or BABB clearing
in terms of penetration depth, it offers other advantages: the technique here can be employed to
deparaffinize and clear tissue without the risk of dissolving melanin; and the cleared specimens are
not fragile. The application of new multiphoton imaging methods to archived medical specimens could
provide new insight into disease progression and help refine diagnostic criteria for accurate early
detection.
Authors: Paul J Campagnola; Andrew C Millard; Mark Terasaki; Pamela E Hoppe; Christian J Malone; William A Mohler Journal: Biophys J Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Hans-Ulrich Dodt; Ulrich Leischner; Anja Schierloh; Nina Jährling; Christoph Peter Mauch; Katrin Deininger; Jan Michael Deussing; Matthias Eder; Walter Zieglgänsberger; Klaus Becker Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2007-03-25 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: J E Gershenwald; M I Colome; J E Lee; P F Mansfield; C Tseng; J J Lee; C M Balch; M I Ross Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas E Matthews; Jesse W Wilson; Simone Degan; Mary Jane Simpson; Jane Y Jin; Jennifer Y Zhang; Warren S Warren Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Michael G Monaghan; Sebastian Kroll; Sara Y Brucker; Katja Schenke-Layland Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Peter Höök; Teresa Brito-Robinson; Oleg Kim; Cody Narciso; Holly V Goodson; John W Weisel; Mark S Alber; Jeremiah J Zartman Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 3.732