CONTEXT: Inconsistent associations between maternal vitamin D status and fetal size have been published in small studies. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine the association between maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels and measures of newborn and placental weight. DESIGN AND SETTING: We measured maternal 25(OH)D in mothers from the Collaborative Perinatal Project, an observational cohort conducted in 12 U.S. medical centers from 1959 to 1965. PARTICIPANTS: Women delivering singleton, term, live births with 25(OH)D measured at a gestation of 26 wk or less (n = 2146). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Birth weight, ponderal index, placental weight, the placental to fetal weight ratio, and small for gestational age were measured. Hypotheses were formulated after data collection. RESULTS: After confounder adjustment, mothers with 25(OH)D of 37.5 nmol/liter or greater gave birth to newborns with 46 g [95% confidence interval (CI), 9-82 g] higher birth weights and 0.13 cm (0.01-0.25 cm) larger head circumferences compared with mothers with less than 37.5 nmol/liter. Birth weight and head circumference rose with increasing 25(OH)D up to 37.5 nmol/liter and then leveled off (P < 0.05). No association was observed between 25(OH)D and ponderal index, placental weight, or the placental to fetal weight ratio. Maternal 25(OH)D of 37.5 nmol/liter or greater vs. less than 37.5 nmol/liter in the first trimester was associated with half the risk of small for gestational age (adjusted odds ratio 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.9), but no second-trimester association was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal vitamin D status is independently associated with markers of physiological and pathological growth in term infants. Adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to test whether maternal vitamin D supplementation may improve fetal growth.
CONTEXT: Inconsistent associations between maternal vitamin D status and fetal size have been published in small studies. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine the association between maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels and measures of newborn and placental weight. DESIGN AND SETTING: We measured maternal 25(OH)D in mothers from the Collaborative Perinatal Project, an observational cohort conducted in 12 U.S. medical centers from 1959 to 1965. PARTICIPANTS: Women delivering singleton, term, live births with 25(OH)D measured at a gestation of 26 wk or less (n = 2146). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Birth weight, ponderal index, placental weight, the placental to fetal weight ratio, and small for gestational age were measured. Hypotheses were formulated after data collection. RESULTS: After confounder adjustment, mothers with 25(OH)D of 37.5 nmol/liter or greater gave birth to newborns with 46 g [95% confidence interval (CI), 9-82 g] higher birth weights and 0.13 cm (0.01-0.25 cm) larger head circumferences compared with mothers with less than 37.5 nmol/liter. Birth weight and head circumference rose with increasing 25(OH)D up to 37.5 nmol/liter and then leveled off (P < 0.05). No association was observed between 25(OH)D and ponderal index, placental weight, or the placental to fetal weight ratio. Maternal 25(OH)D of 37.5 nmol/liter or greater vs. less than 37.5 nmol/liter in the first trimester was associated with half the risk of small for gestational age (adjusted odds ratio 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.9), but no second-trimester association was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal vitamin D status is independently associated with markers of physiological and pathological growth in term infants. Adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to test whether maternal vitamin D supplementation may improve fetal growth.
Authors: Lisa M Bodnar; Janet M Catov; Joseph M Zmuda; Margaret E Cooper; Meredith S Parrott; James M Roberts; Mary L Marazita; Hyagriv N Simhan Journal: J Nutr Date: 2010-03-03 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Ann Prentice; Landing M A Jarjou; Gail R Goldberg; Janet Bennett; Tim J Cole; Inez Schoenmakers Journal: Acta Paediatr Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.299
Authors: Jonathan A C Sterne; Ian R White; John B Carlin; Michael Spratt; Patrick Royston; Michael G Kenward; Angela M Wood; James R Carpenter Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-06-29
Authors: Natalia E Schlabritz-Loutsevitch; Anthony G Comuzzie; Michael M Mahaney; Gene B Hubbard; Edward J Dick; Mehmet Kocak; Sonali Gupta; Maira Carrillo; Mauro Schenone; Arnold Postlethwaite; Andrzej Slominski Journal: Comp Med Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: Alison D Gernand; Lisa M Bodnar; Mark A Klebanoff; W Tony Parks; Hyagriv N Simhan Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Berthold Koletzko; K M Godfrey; Lucilla Poston; Hania Szajewska; Johannes B van Goudoever; Marita de Waard; Brigitte Brands; Rosalie M Grivell; Andrea R Deussen; Jodie M Dodd; Bernadeta Patro-Golab; Bartlomiej M Zalewski Journal: Ann Nutr Metab Date: 2019-01-23 Impact factor: 3.374
Authors: Spyridon N Karras; Hana Fakhoury; Giovanna Muscogiuri; William B Grant; Johannes M van den Ouweland; Anna Maria Colao; Kalliopi Kotsa Journal: Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 5.346
Authors: J Wen; Q Hong; L Zhu; P Xu; Z Fu; X Cui; L You; X Wang; T Wu; H Ding; Y Dai; C Ji; X Guo Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2016-12-23 Impact factor: 5.095