Literature DB >> 23161864

Motor representations in the intact hemisphere of the rat are reduced after repetitive training of the impaired forelimb.

Scott Barbay1, David J Guggenmos, Mariko Nishibe, Randolph J Nudo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During recovery from a unilateral cortical stroke, spared cortical motor areas in the contralateral (intact) cerebral cortex are recruited. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that compensation with the less-impaired limb may have a detrimental inhibitory effect on the intact cortical hemisphere and could impede recovery of the more-impaired limb. However, evidence from detailed neurophysiological mapping studies in animal models is lacking.
OBJECTIVES: The present study examines neurophysiological changes in the intact hemisphere of the rat following a unilateral ischemic infarct to cortical forelimb motor areas.
METHODS: A total of 8 rats were trained for 2 weeks on a reach and retrieval task prior to an ischemic infarct induced by the vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 injected into the cortical gray matter encompassing the 2 forelimb motor representations: the caudal forelimb area (CFA) and the rostral forelimb area (RFA). Animals were randomly assigned to an infarct/training group (n = 4) or an infarct/no-training group (ie, spontaneous recovery, n = 4). After a 5-week postinfarct period, motor areas of the intact hemisphere (CFA and RFA) were characterized using intracortical microstimulation techniques. The resulting maps of evoked movements were compared with maps derived from CFA and RFA in normal rats (normal, n = 5; normal/training, n = 4).
RESULTS: Compared with the normal/no-training group, CFA representations were significantly smaller in the infarct/training group but not in the infarct/no-training group. No significant differences were found in RFA.
CONCLUSIONS: Repetitive training of the more-impaired forelimb during the postinfarct recovery period reduces the size of motor representations in the intact hemisphere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23161864      PMCID: PMC3962819          DOI: 10.1177/1545968312465193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  10 in total

Review 1.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex after stroke: a focused review.

Authors:  Manuela Corti; Carolynn Patten; William Triggs
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.159

2.  Reorganization of motor cortex after controlled cortical impact in rats and implications for functional recovery.

Authors:  Mariko Nishibe; Scott Barbay; David Guggenmos; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Anatomical and functional evidence for lesion-specific sprouting of corticostriatal input in the adult rat.

Authors:  J A Napieralski; A K Butler; M F Chesselet
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1996-09-30       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  The "good" limb makes the "bad" limb worse: experience-dependent interhemispheric disruption of functional outcome after cortical infarcts in rats.

Authors:  Rachel P Allred; Colleen H Cappellini; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Behavioral and neuroplastic effects of focal endothelin-1 induced sensorimotor cortex lesions.

Authors:  D L Adkins; A C Voorhies; T A Jones
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Motor skill training, but not voluntary exercise, improves skilled reaching after unilateral ischemic lesions of the sensorimotor cortex in rats.

Authors:  Monica A Maldonado; Rachel P Allred; Erik L Felthauser; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Acute but not chronic differences in skilled reaching for food following motor cortex devascularization vs. photothrombotic stroke in the rat.

Authors:  M Alaverdashvili; S-K Moon; C D Beckman; A Virag; I Q Whishaw
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Combination of NEP 1-40 treatment and motor training enhances behavioral recovery after a focal cortical infarct in rats.

Authors:  Pei-chun Fang; Scott Barbay; Erik J Plautz; Erica Hoover; Stephen M Strittmatter; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Maladaptive effects of learning with the less-affected forelimb after focal cortical infarcts in rats.

Authors:  Rachel P Allred; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  The role of contralesional dorsal premotor cortex after stroke as studied with concurrent TMS-fMRI.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; Orlando Swayne; Felix Blankenburg; Christian C Ruff; James Teo; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Jon Driver; John C Rothwell; Nick S Ward
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 6.167

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Robotic therapy for chronic stroke: general recovery of impairment or improved task-specific skill?

Authors:  Tomoko Kitago; Jeff Goldsmith; Michelle Harran; Leslie Kane; Jessica Berard; Sylvia Huang; Sophia L Ryan; Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer; Vincent S Huang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Preclinical Studies of Neuroplasticity Following Experimental Brain Injury.

Authors:  David T Bundy; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Traumatic Brain Injury Occludes Training-Dependent Cortical Reorganization in the Contralesional Hemisphere.

Authors:  David T Pruitt; Tanya T Danaphongse; Ariel N Schmid; Robert A Morrison; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker; Seth A Hays
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 4.  Motor System Reorganization After Stroke: Stimulating and Training Toward Perfection.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones; DeAnna L Adkins
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-09

5.  Effects of ketamine and propofol on motor evoked potentials elicited by intracranial microstimulation during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Havan Furmaga; Hyun-Joo Park; Jessica Cooperrider; Kenneth B Baker; Matthew Johnson; John T Gale; Andre G Machado
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-23

6.  The Effect of Lesion Size on the Organization of the Ipsilesional and Contralesional Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Boris Touvykine; Babak K Mansoori; Loyda Jean-Charles; Joan Deffeyes; Stephan Quessy; Numa Dancause
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Using Biophysical Models to Understand the Effect of tDCS on Neurorehabilitation: Searching for Optimal Covariates to Enhance Poststroke Recovery.

Authors:  Paola Malerba; Sofia Straudi; Felipe Fregni; Maxim Bazhenov; Nino Basaglia
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Improved methods for chronic light-based motor mapping in mice: automated movement tracking with accelerometers, and chronic EEG recording in a bilateral thin-skull preparation.

Authors:  Gergely Silasi; Jamie D Boyd; Jeff Ledue; Timothy H Murphy
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.492

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.