Literature DB >> 20826657

The role of contralesional dorsal premotor cortex after stroke as studied with concurrent TMS-fMRI.

Sven Bestmann1, Orlando Swayne, Felix Blankenburg, Christian C Ruff, James Teo, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Jon Driver, John C Rothwell, Nick S Ward.   

Abstract

Contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (cPMd) may support residual motor function following stroke. We performed two complementary experiments to explore how cPMd might perform this role in a group of chronic human stroke patients. First, we used paired-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to establish the physiological influence of cPMd on ipsilesional primary motor cortex (iM1) at rest. We found that this influence became less inhibitory/more facilitatory in patients with greater clinical impairment. Second, we applied TMS over cPMd during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in these patients to examine the causal influence of cPMd TMS on the whole network of surviving cortical motor areas in either hemisphere and whether these influences changed during affected hand movement. We confirmed that hand grip-related activation in cPMd was greater in more impaired patients. Furthermore, the peak ipsilesional sensorimotor cortex activity shifted posteriorly in more impaired patients. Critical new findings were that concurrent TMS-fMRI results correlated with the level of both clinical impairment and neurophysiological impairment (i.e., less inhibitory/more facilitatory cPMd-iM1 measure at rest as assessed with paired-coil TMS). Specifically, greater clinical and neurophysiological impairment was associated with a stronger facilitatory influence of cPMd TMS on blood oxygenation level-dependent signal in posterior parts of ipsilesional sensorimotor cortex during hand grip, corresponding to the posteriorly shifted sensorimotor activity seen in more impaired patients. cPMd TMS was not found to influence activity in other brain regions in either hemisphere. This state-dependent influence on ipsilesional sensorimotor regions may provide a mechanism by which cPMd supports recovered function after stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20826657      PMCID: PMC3044467          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5642-09.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  72 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation can be used to test connections to primary motor areas from frontal and medial cortex in humans.

Authors:  C Civardi; R Cantello; P Asselman; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Motor cortex excitability following short trains of repetitive magnetic stimuli.

Authors:  N Modugno; Y Nakamura; C D MacKinnon; S R Filipovic; S Bestmann; A Berardelli; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation, causal structure-function mapping and networks of functional relevance.

Authors:  Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Output properties and organization of the forelimb representation of motor areas on the lateral aspect of the hemisphere in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Boudrias; Rebecca L McPherson; Shawn B Frost; Paul D Cheney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke?

Authors:  Friedhelm C Hummel; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 44.182

6.  Artifacts caused by transcranial magnetic stimulation coils and EEG electrodes in T(2)*-weighted echo-planar imaging.

Authors:  J Baudewig; W Paulus; J Frahm
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 7.  Functional reorganization of the cerebral motor system after stroke.

Authors:  Nick S Ward
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.710

8.  Time course of functional connectivity between dorsal premotor and contralateral motor cortex during movement selection.

Authors:  Giacomo Koch; Michele Franca; Miguel Fernandez Del Olmo; Binith Cheeran; Rosemary Milton; Maria Alvarez Sauco; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Enhanced cortical activation in the contralesional hemisphere of chronic stroke patients in response to motor skill challenge.

Authors:  Judith D Schaechter; Katherine L Perdue
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Magnetic stimulation of human premotor or motor cortex produces interhemispheric facilitation through distinct pathways.

Authors:  Tobias Bäumer; Franka Bock; Giacomo Koch; Rüdiger Lange; John C Rothwell; Hartwig R Siebner; Alexander Münchau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  74 in total

1.  Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke.

Authors:  Lynley V Bradnam; Cathy M Stinear; P Alan Barber; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Stratifying chronic stroke patients based on the influence of contralesional motor cortices: An inter-hemispheric inhibition study.

Authors:  Yin-Liang Lin; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; David A Cunningham; Manshi Li; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; John Lee; Stephen Jones; Ken Sakaie; Xiaofeng Wang; Andre G Machado; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Inhibition versus facilitation of contralesional motor cortices in stroke: Deriving a model to tailor brain stimulation.

Authors:  Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Andre G Machado; Adriana B Conforto; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; David A Cunningham; Nicole M Varnerin; Xiaofeng Wang; Ken Sakaie; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Serial treatments of primed low-frequency rTMS in stroke: characteristics of responders vs. nonresponders.

Authors:  James R Carey; Huiqiong Deng; Bernadette T Gillick; Jessica M Cassidy; David C Anderson; Lei Zhang; William Thomas
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Dissociable effects of local inhibitory and excitatory theta-burst stimulation on large-scale brain dynamics.

Authors:  Luca Cocchi; Martin V Sale; Anton Lord; Andrew Zalesky; Michael Breakspear; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Automatic selection and feature extraction of motor-evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients.

Authors:  Jose E Tecuapetla-Trejo; Jessica Cantillo-Negrete; Paul Carrillo-Mora; Raquel Valdés-Cristerna; Emmanuel Ortega-Robles; Oscar Arias-Carrion; Ruben I Carino-Escobar
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  The functional role of beta-oscillations in the supplementary motor area during reaching and grasping after stroke: A question of structural damage to the corticospinal tract.

Authors:  Fanny Quandt; Marlene Bönstrup; Robert Schulz; Jan E Timmermann; Maike Mund; Maximilian J Wessel; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  Biomarkers and predictors of restorative therapy effects after stroke.

Authors:  Erin Burke; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.081

9.  Rethinking stimulation of the brain in stroke rehabilitation: why higher motor areas might be better alternatives for patients with greater impairments.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 7.519

Review 10.  Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Pino; Giovanni Pellegrino; Giovanni Assenza; Fioravante Capone; Florinda Ferreri; Domenico Formica; Federico Ranieri; Mario Tombini; Ulf Ziemann; John C Rothwell; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 42.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.