Literature DB >> 23161231

KRAS mutation testing in colorectal cancer as an example of the pathologist's role in personalized targeted therapy: a practical approach.

Paweł Domagała1, Jolanta Hybiak, Violetta Sulżyc-Bielicka, Cezary Cybulski, Janusz Ryś, Wenancjusz Domagała.   

Abstract

Identifying targets for personalized targeted therapy is the pathologist's domain and a treasure. For decades, pathologists have had to learn, understand, adopt and implement many new laboratory techniques as they arrived on the scene. Pathologists successfully integrate the results of those tests into final pathology reports that were, and still are, the basis of clinical therapeutic decisions. The molecular methods are different but no more difficult to comprehend in the era of "kit procedures". In recent years, the development of targeted therapies has influenced routine practices in pathology laboratories because the use of molecular techniques is required to include clinically useful predictive information in the pathology report. Pathologists have the knowledge and expertise to identify particular gene mutations using the appropriate molecular tests currently available. This review focuses on the most important recent developments in KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), and shows that a pathologist is involved in 10 stages of this procedure. Recent studies have shown that highly sensitive, simple, reliable and rapid assays may significantly improve the identification of CRC patients resistant to anti-EGFR therapy. Thus, direct sequencing does not seem to be an optimal procedure of KRAS testing for clinical purposes. Twelve currently available high-sensitivity diagnostic assays (with the CE-IVD mark) for KRAS mutation testing are briefly described and compared. The suggested pathology report content for somatic mutation tests is described. In conclusion, evidence is presented that sending away paraffin blocks with tumor tissue for KRAS mutation testing may not be in the best interest of patients. Instead, an evidence-based approach indicates that KRAS mutation testing should be performed in pathology departments, only with the use of CE-IVD/FDA-approved KRAS tests, and with the obligatory, periodic participation in the KRAS EQA scheme organized by the European Society of Pathology as an independent international body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23161231     DOI: 10.5114/pjp.2012.31499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pol J Pathol        ISSN: 1233-9687            Impact factor:   1.072


  11 in total

1.  Mutation of the PIK3CA gene as a prognostic factor in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Rafał Stec; Aleksandra Semeniuk-Wojtaś; Radosław Charkiewicz; Lubomir Bodnar; Jan Korniluk; Marta Smoter; Lech Chyczewski; Jacek Nikliński; Cezary Szczylik
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 2.  Extended RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer-Refining the predictive molecular biomarkers.

Authors:  Humaid O Al-Shamsi; Waleed Alhazzani; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-06

Review 3.  Blood circulating tumor DNA for non-invasive genotyping of colon cancer patients.

Authors:  Giulia Siravegna; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Clinical Validation of a Multiplex Kit for RAS Mutations in Colorectal Cancer: Results of the RASKET (RAS KEy Testing) Prospective, Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Takayuki Yoshino; Kei Muro; Kensei Yamaguchi; Tomohiro Nishina; Tadamichi Denda; Toshihiro Kudo; Wataru Okamoto; Hiroya Taniguchi; Kiwamu Akagi; Takeshi Kajiwara; Shuichi Hironaka; Taroh Satoh
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 8.143

5.  Optimized Multiplex Detection of 7 KRAS Mutations by Taqman Allele-Specific qPCR.

Authors:  Andrea Orue; Manuel Rieber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  New findings on primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: do all roads lead to RAS?

Authors:  Giuseppe Bronte; Nicola Silvestris; Marta Castiglia; Antonio Galvano; Francesco Passiglia; Giovanni Sortino; Giuseppe Cicero; Christian Rolfo; Marc Peeters; Viviana Bazan; Daniele Fanale; Antonio Giordano; Antonio Russo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-09-22

7.  Genotyping of KRAS Mutational Status by the In-Check Lab-on-Chip Platform.

Authors:  Maria Guarnaccia; Rosario Iemmolo; Floriana San Biagio; Enrico Alessi; Sebastiano Cavallaro
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Genetic and immune factors underlying the efficacy of cetuximab and panitumumab in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Paweł Adam Krawczyk; Dariusz M Kowalski
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2013-11-14

Review 9.  RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: advances in Europe.

Authors:  J Han J M Van Krieken; Etienne Rouleau; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Nicola Normanno; Scott D Patterson; Andreas Jung
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Key differences between 13 KRAS mutation detection technologies and their relevance for clinical practice.

Authors:  James L Sherwood; Helen Brown; Alessandro Rettino; Amelie Schreieck; Graeme Clark; Bart Claes; Bhuwnesh Agrawal; Ria Chaston; Benjamin S G Kong; Paul Choppa; Anders O H Nygren; Ina L Deras; Alexander Kohlmann
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2017-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.