Literature DB >> 23160544

A proposed protocol for acceptance and constancy control of computed tomography systems: a Nordic Association for Clinical Physics (NACP) work group report.

Samuel Kuttner1, Robert Bujila, Mika Kortesniemi, Henrik Andersson, Love Kull, Bjørn Helge Østerås, Jesper Thygesen, Ivanka Sojat Tarp.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality assurance (QA) of computed tomography (CT) systems is one of the routine tasks for medical physicists in the Nordic countries. However, standardized QA protocols do not yet exist and the QA methods, as well as the applied tolerance levels, vary in scope and extent at different hospitals.
PURPOSE: To propose a standardized protocol for acceptance and constancy testing of CT scanners in the Nordic Region.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Following a Nordic Association for Clinical Physics (NACP) initiative, a group of medical physicists, with representatives from four Nordic countries, was formed. Based on international literature and practical experience within the group, a comprehensive standardized test protocol was developed.
RESULTS: The proposed protocol includes tests related to the mechanical functionality, X-ray tube, detector, and image quality for CT scanners. For each test, recommendations regarding the purpose, equipment needed, an outline of the test method, the measured parameter, tolerance levels, and the testing frequency are stated. In addition, a number of optional tests are briefly discussed that may provide further information about the CT system.
CONCLUSION: Based on international references and medical physicists' practical experiences, a comprehensive QA protocol for CT systems is proposed, including both acceptance and constancy tests. The protocol may serve as a reference for medical physicists in the Nordic countries.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23160544     DOI: 10.1258/ar.2012.120254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  5 in total

1.  CT image quality over time: comparison of image quality for six different CT scanners over a six-year period.

Authors:  Ana Maria A Roa; Hilde K Andersen; Anne Catrine T Martinsen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  100 days with scans of the same Catphan phantom on the same CT scanner.

Authors:  Ellen Husby; Elisabeth D Svendsen; Hilde K Andersen; Anne Catrine T Martinsen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  A routine quality assurance test for CT automatic exposure control systems.

Authors:  Gareth R Iball; Alexis C Moore; Elizabeth J Crawford
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Quality control of CT systems by automated monitoring of key performance indicators: a two-year study.

Authors:  Patrik Nowik; Robert Bujila; Gavin Poludniowski; Annette Fransson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Applying three different methods of measuring CTDIfree air to the extended CTDI formalism for wide-beam scanners (IEC 60601-2-44): A comparative study.

Authors:  Robert Bujila; Love Kull; Mats Danielsson; Jonas Andersson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.