Literature DB >> 23159593

Evaluation of BRAF mutation testing methodologies in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cutaneous melanomas.

Johanne Lade-Keller1, Kirsten M Rømer, Per Guldberg, Rikke Riber-Hansen, Lise Lotte Hansen, Torben Steiniche, Henrik Hager, Lasse S Kristensen.   

Abstract

Patients diagnosed with BRAF V600E mutated cutaneous melanoma show response to treatment with the BRAF inhibitor Vemurafenib. Different methods for BRAF mutation detection exist; however, only the Cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patient selection. The results from this test depend on the percentage of tumor cells in the samples, which clinically may be estimated with substantial variation. We have evaluated five different methods: the Cobas test, Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, TaqMan-based allele-specific PCR, and Competitive Amplification of Differentially Melting Amplicons (CADMA), for detection of BRAF c.1799T>A (V600E) mutations in 28 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cutaneous melanoma samples. We show that the frequency of the BRAF V600E mutation is influenced by the analytical sensitivity of the applied method. However, a 100% consensus was observed among all five methods when the tumor tissue fraction was more than 10% of all tissue or more than 50% of cell-dense tissue. When using Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, or the Cobas test, it may be advisable to perform macrodissection before mutation testing if the tumor cell fraction is low. CADMA and TaqMan may not require macrodissections for a reliable test. Therefore, the use of more sensitive methods may have a future in testing for BRAF mutations in clinical settings.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23159593     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  29 in total

1.  Negative immune checkpoint regulation by VISTA: a mechanism of acquired resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma patients.

Authors:  Hojabr Kakavand; Louise A Jackett; Alexander M Menzies; Tuba N Gide; Matteo S Carlino; Robyn P M Saw; John F Thompson; James S Wilmott; Georgina V Long; Richard A Scolyer
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Is a single BRAF wild-type test sufficient to exclude melanoma patients from vemurafenib therapy?

Authors:  Mélanie Saint-Jean; Gaëlle Quéreux; Jean-Michel Nguyen; Lucie Peuvrel; Anabelle Brocard; Audrey Vallée; Anne-Chantal Knol; Amir Khammari; Marc G Denis; Brigitte Dréno
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 8.551

3.  Immunohistochemistry as a quick screening method for clinical detection of BRAF(V600E) mutation in melanoma patients.

Authors:  Qiongrong Chen; Chunjiao Xia; Yunte Deng; Mingwei Wang; Ping Luo; Changming Wu; Junqiu Yue; Na Fang; Manxiang Wang; Shaozhong Wei
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-02-23

4.  Tumor cellularity as a quality assurance measure for accurate clinical detection of BRAF mutations in melanoma.

Authors:  Jonathan C Dudley; Grzegorz T Gurda; Li-Hui Tseng; Derek A Anderson; Guoli Chen; Janis M Taube; Christopher D Gocke; James R Eshleman; Ming-Tseh Lin
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.074

5.  BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry is reliable in primary and metastatic colorectal carcinoma regardless of treatment status and shows high intratumoral homogeneity.

Authors:  Jacob R Bledsoe; Michal Kamionek; Mari Mino-Kenudson
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  BRAF V600E mutation-specific immunohistochemical analysis in ameloblastomas: a 44-patient cohort study from a single institution.

Authors:  Adepitan A Owosho; Adeola M Ladeji; Kehinde E Adebiyi; Mofoluwaso A Olajide; Ikechukwu S I Okoye; Temitope Kehinde; Ngozi N Nwizu; Kurt F Summersgill
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Utility of BRAF V600E Immunohistochemistry Expression Pattern as a Surrogate of BRAF Mutation Status in 154 Patients with Advanced Melanoma.

Authors:  Michael T Tetzlaff; Penvadee Pattanaprichakul; Jennifer Wargo; Patricia S Fox; Keyur P Patel; Jeannelyn S Estrella; Russell R Broaddus; Michelle D Williams; Michael A Davies; Mark J Routbort; Alexander J Lazar; Scott E Woodman; Wen-Jen Hwu; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Victor G Prieto; Carlos A Torres-Cabala; Jonathan L Curry
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Absence of BRAF exon 15 mutations in multiple myeloma and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia questions its validity as a therapeutic target in plasma cell neoplasias.

Authors:  Eleftheria Hatzimichael; Samuel Murray; Evangelos Briasoulis
Journal:  Am J Blood Res       Date:  2013-05-05

9.  Comparison between two widely used laboratory methods in BRAF V600 mutation detection in a large cohort of clinical samples of cutaneous melanoma metastases to the lymph nodes.

Authors:  Monika Jurkowska; Aleksandra Gos; Konrad Ptaszyński; Wanda Michej; Andrzej Tysarowski; Renata Zub; Janusz A Siedlecki; Piotr Rutkowski
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-07-01

10.  Discordance Between Cobas BRAF V600 Testing and VE1 Immunohistochemistry in a Melanoma Patient With Bone Marrow Metastases.

Authors:  Suthee Rapisuwon; Klaus J Busam; Kellie Parks; Paul B Chapman; Elsie Lee; Michael B Atkins
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.